PAHC vs CSCIF vs ZYBT Stock Comparison

Phibro Animal Health, COSCIENS Biopharma and Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCIF COSCIENS Biopharma Inc.
$6.44 -3.3% 1M +150.6% 1Y
Market cap
$20.50M
P/E
5.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 5, COSCIENS Biopharma 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAHCCSCIFZYBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.57B $20.50M $63.45M PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.8x 5.0x -6.8x CSCIF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% -11.6% — PAHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.6% 51.4% — CSCIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.7% +150.6% -41.9% CSCIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.1%/yr -35.8%/yr — PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.6% 209.8% 306.4% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 42/100 — PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

PAHCCSCIFZYBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Valuation 92 #51 of 624 15 #80 of 94 85 #97 of 624
Growth 85 #89 of 601 30 #65 of 92 –
Profitability 85 #81 of 541 45 #48 of 86 –
Financial Health 26 #481 of 647 77 #22 of 93 31 #444 of 647
Shareholder Returns 53 #169 of 359 – –
Overall 68 42 –
  • PAHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • CSCIF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ZYBT ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAHCCSCIFZYBTSPY
1 month +9.6%-3.3%+15.3% +0.7%
3 months +6.6%+28.8%+5.1% +3.7%
6 months -26.9%+242.6%+55.4% +7.1%
Year to date +4.0%+212.6%+24.3% +12.8%
1 year -5.7%+150.6%-41.9% +11.9%
3 years +255.2%+5.9%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +52.6%+1.9%— +22.8%
5 years +77.1%-89.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +12.1%-35.8%— +10.9%
10 years +49.2%-98.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.1%-33.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePAHCCSCIFZYBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.6%209.8%306.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.0%204.0%200.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.74-0.980.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.72-0.14 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.9%-98.8%-95.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.8%-12.4%-82.1% -1.2%
52-week high $59.58$7.35$8.01 $779.14
52-week low $28.52$0.79$0.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAHCCSCIFZYBT
P/E now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 17.8x 5.0xmedian 21.0x -6.8xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 9.1x 2.6xmedian 1.4x 4.1xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 15.0x -2.4xmedian 12.9x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 159.7xmedian 21.7x -2.3xmedian 15.5x 38.4xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.2x 1.3xmedian 1.7x 1.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.35 -0.94median 1.68 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Revenue $1.52B $7.89M –
Gross profit $512.52M $3.00M –
Operating income $194.40M -$7.79M –
Net income $99.72M $4.05M –
Free cash flow $9.87M -$8.86M –
R&D – $1.99M –
EPS (diluted) $2.43 $1.28 –
Cash & equivalents $61.42M $5.01M $7.19M
Total debt $2.49B – $47.13M
Shares (diluted) 40.96M 3.17M 47.35M
Enterprise value $1.25B -$9.67M $51.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFZYBT
P/E 15.8x 5.0x -6.8x
P/FCF 159.7x -2.3x 38.4x
P/Operating cash flow 22.9x -2.3x –
P/S 1.0x 2.6x 4.1x
P/B 4.1x 1.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 1.3x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 8.3x -2.4x –
EV/EBIT 10.9x -2.0x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.0x –
EV/FCF 213.9x -1.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 30.6x -1.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 -0.94 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% -11.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.8% -20.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.1% -28.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.8% -32.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 76.0% 59.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% -67.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.6% 123.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 30.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 105.2% 118.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.6% -5.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% 37.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.0% -74.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.4% 41.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% -79.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Gross margin 33.8% 38.0% –
EBITDA margin 16.8% -83.6% –
Operating margin 12.8% -98.8% –
Pretax margin 9.0% -87.2% –
Net margin 6.6% 51.4% –
FCF margin 0.6% -112.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 4.5% -111.2% –
Return on equity 26.7% 42.3% –
Return on assets 6.8% 20.1% –
Return on invested capital 14.2% – –
Return on capital employed 16.8% -42.2% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -2.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Debt / assets 41.1% – 17.1%
Debt / equity 1.6x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – –
Debt / FCF 62.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 18.7% 29.7%
Equity / assets 25.7% 81.3% 70.3%
Interest coverage 4.2x -54.1x –
Current ratio 3.0x 5.6x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 4.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 3.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.11 2.31 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Dividend yield 1.2% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 197.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Forward P/E 11.4xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.42FY2027 – –
EPS growth, next FY +6.2%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.53BFY2027 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2027 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAHCCSCIFZYBT
Held by institutions 51.5% – –
Institutions holding 209 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% – –
Institutions buying 117 – –
Institutions selling 74 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.58 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAHCCSCIFZYBT
PAHC 1.00 -0.01 0.00
CSCIF -0.01 1.00 -0.03
ZYBT 0.00 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAHC, CSCIF and ZYBT?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.57B, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) $20.50M, Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) $63.45M.

Which stock is cheaper, PAHC, CSCIF and ZYBT?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 15.8x, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 5.0x, Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) -6.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -11.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 51.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) returned the most: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -5.7%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) +150.6%, Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) -41.9%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +12.1%/yr, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -35.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) 0.00%. COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) and Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.6%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 209.8%, Zhengye Biotechnology Holding (ZYBT) 306.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAHC, CSCIF and ZYBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.