PAHC vs CSCIF vs ALRTF Stock Comparison

Phibro Animal Health, COSCIENS Biopharma and ALR Technologies SG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCIF COSCIENS Biopharma Inc.
$6.10 +1.3% 1M +140.2% 1Y
Market cap
$19.53M
P/E
4.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 5, COSCIENS Biopharma 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAHCCSCIFALRTFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.55B $19.53M $9.23M PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.5x 4.8x -0.6x CSCIF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% -11.6% — PAHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.6% 51.4% — CSCIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.0% +140.2% 0.0% CSCIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr -36.5%/yr -19.7%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.5% 210.2% 409.1% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 43/100 — PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

PAHCCSCIFALRTF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Valuation 92 #54 of 625 16 #79 of 94 47 #121 of 227
Growth 85 #90 of 602 29 #65 of 91 –
Profitability 86 #81 of 551 46 #47 of 86 –
Financial Health 26 #485 of 656 80 #20 of 95 0 #238 of 238
Shareholder Returns 54 #170 of 365 – –
Overall 68 43 –
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • CSCIF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ALRTF ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAHCCSCIFALRTFSPY
1 month +11.4%+1.3%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +5.5%+12.8%0.0% +3.9%
6 months -29.3%+212.8%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +2.7%+196.1%0.0% +12.9%
1 year -8.0%+140.2%0.0% +12.3%
3 years +256.4%+0.3%-50.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +52.8%+0.1%-20.6% +23.3%
5 years +73.0%-89.7%-66.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.6%-36.5%-19.7% +10.9%
10 years +49.0%-98.5%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +4.1%-34.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePAHCCSCIFALRTFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.5%210.2%409.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.8%204.0%1,100.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.75-0.97-2.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.140.670.00 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.9%-98.8%-93.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.6%-17.0%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $59.58$7.35$0.02 $779.14
52-week low $28.52$0.79$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAHCCSCIFALRTF
P/E now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 17.2x 4.8xmedian 22.0x -0.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 9.0x 2.5xmedian 1.4x 0.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 16.3x -2.2xmedian 12.4x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 157.7xmedian 18.7x -2.2xmedian 15.1x -6.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.2x 1.3xmedian 1.6x -0.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.33 -0.89median 1.66 —median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Revenue $1.52B $7.89M –
Gross profit $512.52M $3.00M –
Operating income $194.40M -$7.79M –
Net income $99.72M $4.05M –
Free cash flow $9.87M -$8.86M –
R&D – $1.99M –
EPS (diluted) $2.43 $1.28 –
Cash & equivalents $61.42M $5.01M $20.31K
Total debt $2.49B – $111.80M
Shares (diluted) 40.96M 3.17M 606.99M
Enterprise value $1.23B -$10.64M $9.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFALRTF
P/E 15.6x 4.8x -0.6x
P/FCF 157.7x -2.2x -6.9x
P/Operating cash flow 22.6x -2.2x –
P/S 1.0x 2.5x 0.7x
P/B 4.0x 1.3x -0.3x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 1.3x -0.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x -2.2x –
EV/EBIT 10.8x -1.8x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x 1.8x –
EV/FCF 211.9x -1.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 30.3x -1.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 -0.89 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% -11.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.8% -20.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.1% -28.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.8% -32.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 76.0% 59.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% -67.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.6% 123.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 30.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 105.2% 118.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.6% -5.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% 37.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.0% -74.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.4% 41.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% -79.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Gross margin 33.8% 38.0% –
EBITDA margin 16.8% -83.6% –
Operating margin 12.8% -98.8% –
Pretax margin 9.0% -87.2% –
Net margin 6.6% 51.4% –
FCF margin 0.6% -112.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 4.5% -111.2% –
Return on equity 26.7% 42.3% –
Return on assets 6.8% 20.1% –
Return on invested capital 14.2% – –
Return on capital employed 16.8% -42.2% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -2.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Debt / assets 41.1% – 68,140%
Debt / equity 1.6x – -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – –
Debt / FCF 62.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 18.7% 84,236%
Equity / assets 25.7% 81.3% -84,136%
Interest coverage 4.2x -54.1x –
Current ratio 3.0x 5.6x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 4.2x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 3.0x –
Altman Z-score 3.10 2.13 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Dividend yield 1.3% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.3% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 197.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.42FY2027 – –
EPS growth, next FY +6.2%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.53BFY2027 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2027 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAHCCSCIFALRTF
Held by institutions 51.5% – –
Institutions holding 208 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% – –
Institutions buying 117 – –
Institutions selling 73 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.60 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAHCCSCIFALRTF
PAHC 1.00 -0.01 0.03
CSCIF -0.01 1.00 0.03
ALRTF 0.03 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAHC, CSCIF and ALRTF?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.55B, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) $19.53M, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) $9.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, PAHC, CSCIF and ALRTF?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 15.5x, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 4.8x, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -0.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -11.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 51.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) returned the most: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -8.0%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) +140.2%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.0%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.6%/yr, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -36.5%/yr, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -19.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 0.00%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.00%. COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) and ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 210.2%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 409.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAHC, CSCIF and ALRTF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.