PACS vs BTSG Stock Comparison

Pacs and BrightSpring Health Services Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PACS PACS Group, Inc.
$47.88 +16.0% 1M +280.0% 1Y
Market cap
$7.58B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.55B
Div. yield
–
Home Health and Senior Care Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Pacs leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Pacs 7, BrightSpring Health Services 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPACSBTSGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.58B $11.53B BTSG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.1x 32.9x PACS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.0x 33.7x PACS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.2% +26.4% BTSG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.8% 2.5% PACS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.8% 8.6% PACS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.6x PACS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +280.0% +72.5% PACS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.5% 44.6% BTSG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 64/100 PACS

Percentile Scorecard

PACSBTSG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPACSBTSG
Valuation 67 #31 of 92 66 #32 of 92
Growth 74 #23 of 87 93 #7 of 87
Profitability 71 #26 of 86 57 #38 of 86
Financial Health 44 #55 of 97 41 #58 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 62 #22 of 56
Overall 64 64
  • PACS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • BTSG ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPACSBTSGSPY
1 month +16.0%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months +1.9%-19.5% +3.9%
6 months +44.5%+22.9% +8.2%
Year to date +24.7%+55.8% +12.9%
1 year +280.0%+72.5% +12.3%

Risk

MeasurePACSBTSGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.5%44.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.6%51.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.381.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.441.63 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.0%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.8%-20.0% -1.2%
52-week high $48.74$72.91 $779.14
52-week low $10.58$31.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePACSBTSG
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 24.6x 32.9xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.6x 0.8xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 14.6x 21.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 62.4xmedian 21.6x 28.6xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 3.2x 5.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 —median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPACSBTSG
Revenue $5.55B $14.37B
Gross profit $1.30B $1.78B
Operating income $410.32M $447.80M
Net income $269.17M $365.85M
Free cash flow $121.47M $402.35M
EPS (diluted) $1.66 $1.66
Cash & equivalents $164.45M $550.38M
Total debt $246.09M $2.19B
Shares (diluted) 161.99M 220.28M
Enterprise value $6.62B $9.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPACSBTSG
P/E 28.1x 32.9x
P/FCF 62.4x 28.6x
P/Operating cash flow 13.2x 22.8x
P/S 1.4x 0.8x
P/B 6.8x 5.6x
P/Tangible book 6.8x 7.5x
EV/EBITDA 16.0x 21.2x
EV/EBIT 18.7x 29.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.9x
EV/FCF 63.1x 32.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x 26.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPACSBTSG
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.2% 26.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.3% 29.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 83.5% 143.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) 103.5% 472.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – –
EPS growth (1Y) 107.9% 448.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.3% 88.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -58.3% 110.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPACSBTSG
Gross margin 23.5% 12.4%
EBITDA margin 8.6% 4.3%
Operating margin 7.4% 3.1%
Pretax margin 6.9% 2.1%
Net margin 4.8% 2.5%
FCF margin 2.2% 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 10.3% 3.5%
Return on equity 24.9% 18.2%
Return on assets 4.8% 6.0%
Return on invested capital 21.8% 8.6%
Return on capital employed 8.9% 9.9%
Asset turnover 1.0x 2.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPACSBTSG
Debt / assets 4.4% 36.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 2.0x 5.4x
Liabilities / assets 80.3% 65.8%
Equity / assets 19.7% 34.2%
Interest coverage 13.9x 2.9x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.32 4.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPACSBTSG
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – 0.6%
Shareholder yield – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPACSBTSG
Forward P/E 21.0xFY2026 33.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.28FY2026 $1.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.9%FY2026 +73.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.4% +42.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.17BFY2026 $16.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.6%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.1% +1.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPACSBTSG
Held by institutions 31.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 239 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% -0.7%
Institutions buying 155 309
Institutions selling 54 83
Buyers to sellers 2.87 3.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PACSBTSG
PACS 1.00 0.12
BTSG 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PACS and BTSG?

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pacs (PACS) $7.58B, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) $11.53B.

Which stock is cheaper, PACS and BTSG?

Pacs (PACS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Pacs (PACS) 28.1x, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) 32.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pacs (PACS) is cheapest (Pacs (PACS) 21.0x, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) 33.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pacs (PACS) +15.2%, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) +26.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Pacs (PACS) has the highest net margin (Pacs (PACS) 4.8%, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) 2.5%). On return on invested capital, Pacs (PACS) leads (Pacs (PACS) 21.8%, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) 8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pacs (PACS) returned the most: Pacs (PACS) +280.0%, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) +72.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) has been the steadiest (Pacs (PACS) 81.5%, BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) 44.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do PACS and BTSG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.12, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, PACS and BTSG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pacs (PACS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.