OZ vs STHO vs LPA Stock Comparison

Belpointe PREP, Star Holdings and Logistic Properties of the Americas Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$34.37 -17.8% 1M -47.1% 1Y
Market cap
$134.38M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
1 win
STHO Star Holdings
$7.45 -13.2% 1M -0.1% 1Y
Market cap
$90.01M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$93.77M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Star Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Star Holdings 4, Logistic Properties of the Americas 3, Belpointe PREP 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOZSTHOLPALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $134.38M $90.01M $82.52M OZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 6.5x 4.8x LPA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 21.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -17.7% +32,091.6% LPA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 14.8% 0.1% STHO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 9.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.0x 5.3x STHO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.1% -0.1% -19.9% STHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.2%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 30.5% 66.8% STHO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 45/100 64/100 LPA

Percentile Scorecard

OZSTHOLPA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOZSTHOLPA
Valuation – 24 #30 of 39 95 #3 of 39
Growth – 68 #11 of 32 65 #12 of 32
Profitability – 21 #23 of 29 61 #12 of 29
Financial Health – 28 #27 of 37 36 #24 of 37
Shareholder Returns – 83 #3 of 13 –
Overall – 45 64
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • STHO ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • LPA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOZSTHOLPASPY
1 month -17.8%-13.2%-9.1% +0.7%
3 months -23.7%-20.1%-12.1% +3.7%
6 months -33.2%-13.1%-26.9% +7.1%
Year to date -47.1%-9.5%-4.4% +12.8%
1 year -47.1%-0.1%-19.9% +11.9%
3 years -50.2%-34.5%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -20.7%-13.2%— +22.8%
5 years -65.6%—— +67.6%
5 years, per year -19.2%—— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureOZSTHOLPASPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%30.5%66.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.6%31.9%65.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.250.661.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.450.00-0.30 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.8%-70.8%-99.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.4%-25.0%-35.1% -1.2%
52-week high $67.99$9.93$4.02 $779.14
52-week low $33.95$7.01$2.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOZSTHOLPA
P/E now vs peer median —median 8.7x 6.5xmedian 8.7x 4.8xmedian 8.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.7x 1.0xmedian 4.7x 0.0xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.5x -3.1xmedian 12.5x 6.7xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.2x -1.3xmedian 6.2x -94.0xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median —median 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.28 0.24median 0.28 —median 0.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOZSTHOLPA
Revenue – $93.77M $14.78B
Gross profit – $15.01M –
Operating income – -$91.00M –
Net income – $3.99M $77.06M
Free cash flow – -$68.76M -$878.16K
EPS (diluted) – $1.15 $0.54
Cash & equivalents – $34.81M $33.58M
Total debt – $208.84M $320.79M
Shares (diluted) 3.90M 12.08M 31.74M
Enterprise value $134.38M -$80.60M $123.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOZSTHOLPA
P/E – 6.5x 4.8x
P/FCF – -1.3x -94.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -6.5x -113.3x
P/S – 1.0x 0.0x
P/B – 0.3x 0.3x
P/Tangible book – 0.3x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA – -3.1x 6.7x
EV/EBIT – -2.9x 6.8x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 0.0x
EV/FCF – -3.8x -451.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -19.0x -543.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.24 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOZSTHOLPA
Revenue growth (1Y) – -17.7% 32,092%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 184.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 32.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 36.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 28.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 106.7% 294.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 26.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 126.5% 144.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 27.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 29.0% -103.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -39.0% -104.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOZSTHOLPA
Gross margin – 16.0% –
EBITDA margin – -91.4% 0.4%
Operating margin – -97.0% –
Pretax margin – -98.0% 0.3%
Net margin – 14.8% 0.1%
FCF margin – -73.3% 0.0%
Operating cash flow margin – -14.8% 0.0%
Return on equity – 1.5% 8.7%
Return on assets – 0.8% 3.2%
Return on invested capital – – 9.1%
Return on capital employed – – 8.4%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 20.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -3.5x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOZSTHOLPA
Debt / assets – 41.1% 43.0%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.0x 5.3x
Debt / FCF – -3.0x -365.3x
Liabilities / assets – 44.3% 63.3%
Equity / assets – 55.7% 36.7%
Interest coverage – -4.4x 2.9x
Current ratio – – 1.8x
Quick ratio – – 0.3x
Cash ratio – – 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – 20.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOZSTHOLPA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 10.8% –
Shareholder yield – 10.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOZSTHOLPA
Forward P/E – – 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $0.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -76.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +150.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $51.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +26.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOZSTHOLPA
Held by institutions 31.8% 66.4% 1.9%
Institutions holding 45 81 34
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.0% -0.1% -11.9%
Institutions buying 8 31 21
Institutions selling 13 23 10
Buyers to sellers 0.62 1.35 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OZSTHOLPA
OZ 1.00 0.07 0.04
STHO 0.07 1.00 0.20
LPA 0.04 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OZ, STHO and LPA?

Belpointe PREP (OZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Belpointe PREP (OZ) $134.38M, Star Holdings (STHO) $90.01M, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) $82.52M.

Which stock is cheaper, OZ, STHO and LPA?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Star Holdings (STHO) 6.5x, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 4.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Star Holdings (STHO) -17.7%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) +32,091.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Star Holdings (STHO) has the highest net margin (Star Holdings (STHO) 14.8%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 0.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Star Holdings (STHO) returned the most: Belpointe PREP (OZ) -47.1%, Star Holdings (STHO) -0.1%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) -19.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Star Holdings (STHO) has been the steadiest (Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.5%, Star Holdings (STHO) 30.5%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 66.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OZ, STHO and LPA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Star Holdings (STHO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.