OWLT vs MSN vs UEIC Stock Comparison

Owlet, Emerson Radio and Universal Electronics Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OWLT Owlet, Inc.
$4.04 -19.8% 1M -56.6% 1Y
Market cap
$116.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$114.86M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
MSN Emerson Radio Corp
$0.32 -25.6% 1M -38.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.73M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.69M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
1 win
UEIC Universal Electronics Inc
$5.26 +2.7% 1M +20.4% 1Y
Market cap
$67.78M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$330.57M
Div. yield
4.56%
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Universal Electronics leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Universal Electronics 5, Owlet 2, Emerson Radio 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOWLTMSNUEICLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $116.41M $6.73M $67.78M OWLT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.1x -1.8x -4.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 11.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.2% -44.6% -17.9% OWLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.2% -65.5% -4.6% UEIC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -1.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — -1.2x UEIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 4.56% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -56.6% -38.5% +20.4% UEIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.8%/yr -22.6%/yr -33.7%/yr MSN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.8% 62.5% 55.7% UEIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 37/100 58/100 UEIC

Percentile Scorecard

OWLTMSNUEIC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOWLTMSNUEIC
Valuation 2 #41 of 42 44 #24 of 42 91 #11 of 111
Growth 100 #1 of 42 7 #39 of 42 26 #80 of 108
Profitability 18 #33 of 40 3 #39 of 40 35 #68 of 104
Financial Health 41 #26 of 43 93 #4 of 43 46 #63 of 115
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 – 94 #6 of 81
Overall 32 37 58
  • OWLT ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • MSN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • UEIC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOWLTMSNUEICSPY
1 month -19.8%-25.6%+2.7% -0.8%
3 months -22.8%-15.8%+15.4% +3.5%
6 months -22.2%-26.6%+24.6% +7.0%
Year to date -75.0%-15.8%+45.7% +12.2%
1 year -56.6%-38.5%+20.4% +13.0%
3 years -0.2%-42.9%-30.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -0.1%-17.0%-11.3% +23.1%
5 years -92.1%-72.2%-87.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -39.8%-22.6%-33.7% +11.0%
10 years —-67.4%-92.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-10.6%-22.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureOWLTMSNUEICSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.8%62.5%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.7%65.3%51.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.300.200.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.620.37 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-75.6%-93.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.5%-39.6%-10.5% -1.8%
52-week high $16.52$0.53$5.88 $779.14
52-week low $4.04$0.32$2.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOWLTMSNUEIC
P/E now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 16.1x -1.8xmedian 16.1x -4.4xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -20.8xmedian 12.1x 1.1xmedian 12.1x 5.6xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13.7xmedian 11.9x -1.7xmedian 11.9x 8.2xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.2x 0.4xmedian 1.2x 0.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.15median 0.64 0.03median 0.64 -0.11median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOWLTMSNUEIC
Revenue $114.86M $5.69M $330.57M
Gross profit $62.89M $603.00K $97.69M
Operating income -$7.23M -$4.25M -$2.77M
Net income -$8.82M -$3.73M -$15.10M
Free cash flow -$8.53M -$4.06M $8.24M
R&D $15.87M – $21.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $-0.18 $-1.13
Cash & equivalents $30.95M $5.31M $32.40M
Total debt – – $86.37M
Shares (diluted) 28.77M 21.04M 13.43M
Enterprise value -$9.22M -$43.90M -$58.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOWLTMSNUEIC
P/E -9.1x -1.8x -4.4x
P/FCF -13.7x -1.7x 8.2x
P/Operating cash flow -15.0x -1.7x 5.9x
P/S 1.0x 1.2x 0.2x
P/B 5.0x 0.4x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 5.5x 0.4x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA -20.8x 1.1x 5.6x
EV/EBIT -14.2x 1.1x -20.3x
EV/Revenue 0.9x -0.8x 0.2x
EV/FCF -12.0x 1.2x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -13.2x 1.2x 4.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.15 0.03 -0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOWLTMSNUEIC
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.2% -44.6% -17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 29.3% -10.4% -12.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.8% -16.0% -16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.7% -35.5% -8.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 56.4% 25.5% 58.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 50.7% -33.0% 63.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 81.9% 24.1% 7.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 47.0% -63.8% 40.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 85.5% 24.1% 9.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 60.9% -63.8% 41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.7% -22.3% -61.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 43.3% -180.0% -34.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 33.2% -21.7% -68.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% -158.5% -32.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOWLTMSNUEIC
Gross margin 54.8% 10.6% 29.6%
EBITDA margin -4.3% -73.3% 3.0%
Operating margin -6.3% -74.7% -0.8%
Pretax margin -7.7% -65.5% -2.4%
Net margin -11.2% -65.5% -4.6%
FCF margin -7.4% -71.4% 2.5%
Operating cash flow margin -6.8% -71.4% 3.5%
Return on equity -39.9% -22.0% -10.7%
Return on assets -9.8% -20.2% -5.8%
Return on invested capital – – -1.7%
Return on capital employed -19.9% -25.0% -1.9%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.3x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.1x -0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 11.3% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOWLTMSNUEIC
Debt / assets 18.2% – 7.8%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x – -1.2x
Debt / FCF -2.0x – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 8.7% 46.5%
Equity / assets 24.7% 91.3% 53.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 12.1x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 8.5x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.6x 7.9x 0.3x
Altman Z-score -2.25 0.57 2.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOWLTMSNUEIC
Dividend yield – – 4.6%
Net buyback yield -32.1% – 3.4%
Shareholder yield -32.1% 0.0% 8.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOWLTMSNUEIC
Forward P/E – – 11.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.23FY2026 – $0.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +54.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $115.73MFY2026 – $288.89MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.5%FY2026 – -21.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.0% – +11.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOWLTMSNUEIC
Held by institutions 59.2% 4.1% 53.5%
Institutions holding 58 11 46
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% -2.3% -2.2%
Institutions buying 31 3 18
Institutions selling 14 2 16
Buyers to sellers 2.21 1.50 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OWLTMSNUEIC
OWLT 1.00 -0.09 0.02
MSN -0.09 1.00 0.06
UEIC 0.02 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OWLT, MSN and UEIC?

Owlet (OWLT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Owlet (OWLT) $116.41M, Emerson Radio (MSN) $6.73M, Universal Electronics (UEIC) $67.78M.

Which company is growing faster?

Owlet (OWLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Owlet (OWLT) +28.2%, Emerson Radio (MSN) -44.6%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Universal Electronics (UEIC) has the highest net margin (Owlet (OWLT) -11.2%, Emerson Radio (MSN) -65.5%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Universal Electronics (UEIC) returned the most: Owlet (OWLT) -56.6%, Emerson Radio (MSN) -38.5%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) +20.4%. Over five years, Emerson Radio (MSN) compounded fastest (Owlet (OWLT) -39.8%/yr, Emerson Radio (MSN) -22.6%/yr, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -33.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Emerson Radio (MSN) 0.00%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) 4.56%. Owlet (OWLT) and Emerson Radio (MSN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Universal Electronics (UEIC) has been the steadiest (Owlet (OWLT) 85.8%, Emerson Radio (MSN) 62.5%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OWLT, MSN and UEIC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Universal Electronics (UEIC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.