OPEN vs FRPH vs LPA Stock Comparison

Opendoor Technologies, Frp Holdings and Logistic Properties of the Americas Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FRPH Frp Holdings, Inc.
$18.67 -11.6% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$358.43M
P/E
261.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Logistic Properties of the Americas leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Logistic Properties of the Americas 4, Frp Holdings 4, Opendoor Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOPENFRPHLPALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.85B $358.43M $83.47M OPEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.2x 261.1x 4.8x LPA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 22.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -37.2% +3.1% +32,091.6% LPA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -46.7% 3.1% 0.1% FRPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -20.2% 0.9% 9.1% LPA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.2x 6.4x 5.3x OPEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.6% -23.9% -25.0% FRPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.9%/yr -8.5%/yr — FRPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.3% 25.8% 67.1% FRPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 32/100 64/100 LPA

Percentile Scorecard

OPENFRPHLPA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOPENFRPHLPA
Valuation 0 #39 of 39 24 #30 of 39 95 #3 of 39
Growth 16 #27 of 32 13 #28 of 32 65 #12 of 32
Profitability 18 #24 of 29 50 #15 of 29 61 #12 of 29
Financial Health 22 #30 of 38 41 #23 of 38 35 #25 of 38
Shareholder Returns 0 #14 of 14 – –
Overall 11 32 64
  • OPEN ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FRPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • LPA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOPENFRPHLPASPY
1 month -25.7%-11.6%-9.3% -0.2%
3 months -51.5%-20.2%-12.6% +3.9%
6 months -65.1%-13.7%-28.3% +8.2%
Year to date -67.2%-18.1%-3.3% +12.9%
1 year -76.6%-23.9%-25.0% +12.3%
3 years -8.2%-30.9%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -2.8%-11.6%— +23.3%
5 years -92.1%-35.7%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -39.9%-8.5%— +10.9%
10 years —+17.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+1.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOPENFRPHLPASPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.3%25.8%67.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 80.8%26.7%65.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.020.261.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.97-0.93-0.37 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.9%-42.6%-99.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -79.6%-27.0%-34.3% -1.2%
52-week high $9.37$25.56$4.02 $779.14
52-week low $1.91$18.67$2.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOPENFRPHLPA
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 7.9x 261.1xmedian 7.9x 4.8xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 4.7x 8.2xmedian 4.7x 0.0xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 11.2x 26.6xmedian 11.2x 6.7xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.9xmedian 6.2x —median 6.2x -95.1xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 0.6x 0.8xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.13median 0.32 -8.03median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOPENFRPHLPA
Revenue $3.25B $43.62M $14.78B
Gross profit $281.00M – –
Operating income -$521.00M $6.16M –
Net income -$1.52B $1.32M $77.06M
Free cash flow -$474.00M – -$878.16K
R&D $88.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.57 $0.07 $0.54
Cash & equivalents $896.00M $100.98M $33.58M
Total debt $1.96B $214.62M $320.79M
Shares (diluted) 965.78M 19.06M 31.74M
Enterprise value -$1.97B -$137.19M $124.94M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOPENFRPHLPA
P/E -1.2x 261.1x 4.8x
P/FCF -3.9x – -95.1x
P/Operating cash flow -4.0x – -114.6x
P/S 0.6x 8.2x 0.0x
P/B 2.0x 0.8x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 0.8x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA -6.0x 26.6x 6.7x
EV/EBIT -5.6x 76.6x 6.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 10.8x 0.0x
EV/FCF -6.1x – -452.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -6.3x – -545.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.13 -8.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOPENFRPHLPA
Revenue growth (1Y) -37.2% 3.1% 32,092%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -34.0% 3.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -32.6% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 115.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -126.5% -38.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.8% -15.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -398.7% -75.5% 294.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -33.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -276.7% -74.5% 144.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.2% -32.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -187.3% – -103.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -192.8% – -104.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOPENFRPHLPA
Gross margin 8.6% – –
EBITDA margin -14.8% 40.7% 0.4%
Operating margin -16.0% 14.1% –
Pretax margin -46.7% 24.5% 0.3%
Net margin -46.7% 3.1% 0.1%
FCF margin -14.6% – 0.0%
Operating cash flow margin -14.1% – 0.0%
Return on equity -162.9% 0.2% 8.7%
Return on assets -57.3% 0.1% 3.2%
Return on invested capital -20.2% 0.9% 9.1%
Return on capital employed -30.9% – 8.4%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.1x 20.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x – 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 11.4% 6.3% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOPENFRPHLPA
Debt / assets 66.1% 28.2% 43.0%
Debt / equity 2.1x 0.5x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.2x 6.4x 5.3x
Debt / FCF -4.1x – -365.3x
Liabilities / assets 69.1% 40.3% 63.3%
Equity / assets 30.9% 59.7% 36.7%
Interest coverage -4.6x 2.1x 2.9x
Current ratio 2.9x – 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x – 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.9x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score -0.71 – 20.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOPENFRPHLPA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -13.2% – –
Shareholder yield -13.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOPENFRPHLPA
Forward P/E – – 22.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.61FY2026 – $0.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -76.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +150.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.69BFY2026 – $51.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -15.5%FY2026 – +4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +102.2% – +26.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOPENFRPHLPA
Held by institutions 57.7% 47.8% 1.9%
Institutions holding 393 109 34
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.5% +3.0% -11.9%
Institutions buying 227 56 21
Institutions selling 83 30 10
Buyers to sellers 2.73 1.87 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OPENFRPHLPA
OPEN 1.00 0.18 0.17
FRPH 0.18 1.00 0.23
LPA 0.17 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OPEN, FRPH and LPA?

Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) $1.85B, Frp Holdings (FRPH) $358.43M, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) $83.47M.

Which stock is cheaper, OPEN, FRPH and LPA?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -1.2x, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 261.1x, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 4.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -37.2%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) +3.1%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) +32,091.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) has the highest net margin (Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -46.7%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 3.1%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 0.1%). On return on invested capital, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) leads (Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -20.2%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 0.9%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 9.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Frp Holdings (FRPH) returned the most: Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -76.6%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -23.9%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) -25.0%. Over five years, Frp Holdings (FRPH) compounded fastest (Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -39.9%/yr, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Frp Holdings (FRPH) has been the steadiest (Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) 79.3%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 25.8%, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 67.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OPEN, FRPH and LPA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.