OMEX vs FER vs FLR Stock Comparison

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Ferrovial and Fluor Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$54.02 -3.2% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$38.93B
P/E
38.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.37%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins
FLR Fluor Corp
$46.18 -8.3% 1M -4.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.26B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$15.54B
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fluor leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fluor 5, Ferrovial 3, Odyssey Marine Exploration 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMEXFERFLRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $31.69M $38.93B $6.26B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x 38.7x -3.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 50.5x 18.3x FLR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -70.3% — -4.8% FLR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -21,426.8% — -12.8% FLR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — 13.1x OMEX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.37% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.7% -16.7% -4.8% FLR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.4%/yr +12.9%/yr +18.5%/yr FLR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 102.7% 26.3% 48.4% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 1/100 47/100 46/100 FER

Percentile Scorecard

OMEXFERFLR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMEXFERFLR
Valuation 0 #52 of 52 35 #34 of 52 31 #36 of 52
Growth 6 #35 of 37 – 3 #36 of 37
Profitability 0 #37 of 37 – 22 #29 of 37
Financial Health 2 #56 of 57 34 #38 of 57 71 #17 of 57
Shareholder Returns 0 #27 of 27 73 #8 of 27 100 #1 of 27
Overall 1 47 46
  • OMEX ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FLR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMEXFERFLRSPY
1 month -22.9%-3.2%-8.3% -0.2%
3 months -19.4%-12.5%-6.4% +3.9%
6 months -37.9%-20.4%-8.6% +8.2%
Year to date -72.4%-16.4%+16.5% +12.9%
1 year -77.7%-16.7%-4.8% +12.3%
3 years -84.7%+66.2%+38.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -46.5%+18.5%+11.5% +23.3%
5 years -91.8%+83.7%+133.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -39.4%+12.9%+18.5% +10.9%
10 years -87.6%+155.1%-8.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year -18.9%+9.8%-0.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOMEXFERFLRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 102.7%26.3%48.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.7%24.6%49.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.211.041.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.63-0.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-34.3%-47.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.7%-27.4%-19.7% -1.2%
52-week high $2.42$74.38$57.49 $779.14
52-week low $0.51$48.86$39.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMEXFERFLR
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 26.7x 38.7xmedian 26.7x -3.2xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 172.2xmedian 0.8x 3.6xmedian 0.8x 0.4xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.0xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x -28.4xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 23.0x 19.8xmedian 23.0x -19.0xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 2.4x 5.6xmedian 2.4x 2.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.57 —median 0.57 0.01median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMEXFERFLR
Revenue $184.07K – $15.54B
Gross profit – – -$124.00M
Operating income -$20.93M – -$216.00M
Net income -$40.17M – -$2.00B
Free cash flow -$13.44M – -$330.00M
R&D $2.89M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.67 – $-14.16
Cash & equivalents $2.35M $5.02B $2.92B
Total debt $30.18M $12.25B $1.07B
Shares (diluted) 58.59M 718.72M 141.00M
Enterprise value -$20.28M $19.24B -$6.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMEXFERFLR
P/E -0.8x 38.7x -3.2x
P/FCF -2.4x 19.8x -19.0x
P/Operating cash flow -2.4x – -21.8x
P/S 172.2x 3.6x 0.4x
P/B -0.4x 5.6x 2.2x
P/Tangible book -0.4x 5.7x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA -2.0x – -28.4x
EV/EBIT -1.9x – -19.9x
EV/Revenue 213.4x – 0.3x
EV/FCF -2.9x – -13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -2.9x – -14.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 – 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMEXFERFLR
Revenue growth (1Y) -70.3% – -4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -45.0% – 1.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -125.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -34.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -92.5% – -172.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.2% – -76.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -372.5% – -148.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -186.3% – -196.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2,016% – -156.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -124.4% – -253.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -84.9% – -182.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.7% – -85.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -85.1% – -235.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.7% – -124.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMEXFERFLR
Gross margin – – -0.8%
EBITDA margin -10,771% – -1.0%
Operating margin -11,370% – -1.4%
Pretax margin -21,821% – -1.0%
Net margin -21,427% – -12.8%
FCF margin -7,299% – -2.1%
Operating cash flow margin -7,290% – -1.8%
Return on equity – – -69.0%
Return on assets -301.6% – -25.6%
Return on invested capital – – 0.0%
Return on capital employed – – -4.7%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 2.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 228.9% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMEXFERFLR
Debt / assets 75.0% 38.0% 14.2%
Debt / equity -0.1x 1.8x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – 13.1x
Debt / FCF -0.7x – -3.2x
Liabilities / assets 703.9% 78.5% 63.0%
Equity / assets -603.9% 21.5% 37.0%
Interest coverage -7.2x – -5.0x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.1x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.1x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.7x 1.0x
Altman Z-score -42.18 – 3.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMEXFERFLR
Dividend yield – 1.4% –
Net buyback yield -27.1% – 20.4%
Shareholder yield -27.1% 1.4% 20.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMEXFERFLR
Forward P/E – 50.5xFY2026 18.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.91FY2023 $1.07FY2026 $2.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -20.7%FY2026 +15.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.1% +24.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $979.70KFY2023 $11.77BFY2026 $15.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.1%FY2026 +2.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% -5.3% +22.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMEXFERFLR
Held by institutions 41.7% 33.2% 93.4%
Institutions holding 61 337 549
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.6% +17.5% +1.1%
Institutions buying 29 208 249
Institutions selling 11 103 222
Buyers to sellers 2.64 2.02 1.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMEXFERFLR
OMEX 1.00 0.27 0.31
FER 0.27 1.00 0.38
FLR 0.31 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMEX, FER and FLR?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) $31.69M, Ferrovial (FER) $38.93B, Fluor (FLR) $6.26B.

Which company is growing faster?

Fluor (FLR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) -70.3%, Fluor (FLR) -4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fluor (FLR) has the highest net margin (Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) -21,426.8%, Fluor (FLR) -12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fluor (FLR) returned the most: Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) -77.7%, Ferrovial (FER) -16.7%, Fluor (FLR) -4.8%. Over five years, Fluor (FLR) compounded fastest (Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) -39.4%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +12.9%/yr, Fluor (FLR) +18.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferrovial (FER) 1.37%, Fluor (FLR) 0.00%. Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) and Fluor (FLR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Odyssey Marine Exploration (OMEX) 102.7%, Ferrovial (FER) 26.3%, Fluor (FLR) 48.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMEX, FER and FLR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fluor (FLR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.