OMAB vs CAAP vs NVGS Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Corporacion America Airports and Navigator Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd.
$21.69 -5.8% 1M +37.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.44B
P/E
10.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$579.12M
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Navigator Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Navigator Holdings 7, Central North Airport 2, Corporacion America Airports 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABCAAPNVGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.78B $3.84B $1.44B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x 13.1x 10.0x NVGS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.0x 12.3x 9.4x NVGS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.2% +9.6% CAAP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 13.5% 24.9% NVGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.1% 14.9% NVGS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x 1.3x NVGS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.6% +29.4% +37.9% NVGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.2%/yr +33.1%/yr +22.0%/yr CAAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.2% 35.1% 31.5% OMAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 53/100 75/100 NVGS

Percentile Scorecard

OMABCAAPNVGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABCAAPNVGS
Valuation 28 #98 of 136 38 #85 of 136 73 #38 of 136
Growth – 88 #16 of 122 84 #20 of 122
Profitability – 61 #46 of 116 85 #18 of 116
Financial Health 34 #95 of 144 23 #111 of 144 59 #59 of 144
Shareholder Returns 74 #22 of 82 57 #36 of 82 73 #23 of 82
Overall 46 53 75
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CAAP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • NVGS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABCAAPNVGSSPY
1 month -3.9%-0.1%-5.8% -0.8%
3 months -5.5%-9.3%-0.1% +3.5%
6 months -10.9%-3.8%+2.0% +7.0%
Year to date -9.0%-8.2%+25.2% +12.2%
1 year -3.6%+29.4%+37.9% +13.0%
3 years +74.4%+116.9%+53.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.4%+29.5%+15.3% +23.1%
5 years +102.8%+317.9%+170.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +15.2%+33.1%+22.0% +11.0%
10 years +104.2%—+195.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.4%—+11.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureOMABCAAPNVGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.2%35.1%31.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%31.7%34.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.121.430.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.841.20 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-26.6%-39.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.7%-21.4%-13.6% -1.8%
52-week high $134.98$30.35$25.09 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$21.62$15.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABCAAPNVGS
P/E now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 16.1x 13.4xmedian 16.1x 10.1xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.0x 1.8xmedian 1.0x 2.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 1.9xmedian 8.7x 4.6xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.5x 8.4xmedian 11.5x 11.5xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.81 0.70median 0.81 0.25median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABCAAPNVGS
Revenue – $2.16B $579.12M
Gross profit – $745.77M $389.30M
Operating income – $523.99M $300.01M
Net income – $305.55M $148.27M
Free cash flow – $467.72M $122.80M
EPS (diluted) – $1.80 $2.12
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $692.48M $225.89M
Total debt $1.84B $609.38B $781.93M
Shares (diluted) – 162.45M 68.04M
Enterprise value $4.27B $1.22B $742.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPNVGS
P/E 16.1x 13.4x 10.1x
P/FCF 11.8x 8.4x 11.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.3x 7.3x
P/S 5.4x 1.8x 2.4x
P/B 7.5x 2.0x 1.1x
P/Tangible book -9.6x -2.7x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 1.9x 4.6x
EV/EBIT – 1,169x 6.6x
EV/Revenue – 283.4x 3.4x
EV/FCF – 1,310x 16.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 1,291x 10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.70 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPNVGS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.2% 9.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% 8.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 22.1% 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 20.9% 24.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% 32.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 109.3% 58.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% 35.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 159.7% 64.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.2% 41.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.8% -2.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 11.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.3% 136.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 82.6% 64.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPNVGS
Gross margin – 34.5% 67.2%
EBITDA margin – 15,011% 74.6%
Operating margin – 24.2% 51.8%
Pretax margin – 18.6% 46.2%
Net margin – 13.5% 24.9%
FCF margin – 21.6% 21.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 22.0% 33.4%
Return on equity – 16.2% 22.8%
Return on assets – 6.4% 12.4%
Return on invested capital – 0.1% 14.9%
Return on capital employed – 12.9% 14.5%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPNVGS
Debt / assets 43.4% 12,511% 33.7%
Debt / equity 1.2x 314.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x 1.3x
Debt / FCF – 1,303x 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 60.2% 45.2%
Equity / assets 36.9% 39.8% 54.8%
Interest coverage – 0.0x 11.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.5x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.9x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 2.01 1.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPNVGS
Dividend yield 5.5% 3.8% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – – 6.8%
Shareholder yield 5.5% 3.8% 8.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABCAAPNVGS
Forward P/E 15.0xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 9.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $1.94FY2026 $2.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +26.8%FY2026 +94.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% +14.9% -27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $2.18BFY2026 $566.07MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +7.7% -13.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABCAAPNVGS
Held by institutions 12.3% 15.3% 37.4%
Institutions holding 163 108 174
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +2.6% +0.6%
Institutions buying 77 59 107
Institutions selling 59 35 41
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.69 2.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABCAAPNVGS
OMAB 1.00 0.54 0.12
CAAP 0.54 1.00 0.15
NVGS 0.12 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, CAAP and NVGS?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) $3.84B, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) $1.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, CAAP and NVGS?

Navigator Holdings (NVGS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.1x, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) 10.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 12.3x, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) 9.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +16.2%, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) +9.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Navigator Holdings (NVGS) has the highest net margin (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.5%, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) 24.9%). On return on invested capital, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) leads (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 0.1%, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Navigator Holdings (NVGS) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +29.4%, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) +37.9%. Over five years, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +33.1%/yr, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) +22.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Central North Airport (OMAB) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 35.1%, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) 31.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, CAAP and NVGS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Navigator Holdings (NVGS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.