OMAB vs CAAP vs FIP Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Corporacion America Airports and FTAI Infrastructure Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Corporacion America Airports leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Corporacion America Airports 7, Central North Airport 2, FTAI Infrastructure 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABCAAPFIPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.73B $3.86B $327.90M OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x 13.2x -0.5x CAAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.0x 12.1x — CAAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.2% +72.3% FIP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 13.5% -91.9% CAAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.1% -15.3% CAAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x -11.3x FIP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.4% +8.2% -51.3% CAAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.3%/yr +32.8%/yr — CAAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 35.1% 70.1% OMAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 54/100 20/100 CAAP

Percentile Scorecard

OMABCAAPFIP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABCAAPFIP
Valuation 30 #96 of 136 39 #84 of 136 1 #135 of 136
Growth – 88 #16 of 121 26 #90 of 121
Profitability – 61 #46 of 115 3 #112 of 115
Financial Health 35 #94 of 143 23 #111 of 143 1 #141 of 143
Shareholder Returns 74 #22 of 82 59 #34 of 82 72 #24 of 82
Overall 46 54 20
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CAAP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FIP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABCAAPFIPSPY
1 month -3.9%-2.0%-14.4% -0.2%
3 months -8.5%-10.3%-34.6% +3.9%
6 months -6.4%-6.5%-52.2% +8.2%
Year to date -8.9%-10.0%-42.1% +12.9%
1 year -3.4%+8.2%-51.3% +12.3%
3 years +74.5%+112.7%-13.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.4%+28.6%-4.5% +23.3%
5 years +103.7%+312.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.3%+32.8%— +10.9%
10 years +105.1%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.4%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOMABCAAPFIPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%35.1%70.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%31.7%71.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.121.422.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.110.23-0.73 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-26.6%-77.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-22.9%-58.5% -1.2%
52-week high $134.98$30.35$6.44 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$21.62$2.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABCAAPFIP
P/E now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 16.3x 13.1xmedian 16.3x -0.5xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.0x 1.8xmedian 1.0x 0.5xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 1.9xmedian 8.7x -12.6xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.4x 8.3xmedian 11.4x -1.0xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 1.2x -0.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 0.68median 0.82 0.01median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABCAAPFIP
Revenue – $2.16B $659.21M
Gross profit – $745.77M –
Operating income – $523.99M –
Net income – $305.55M -$468.91M
Free cash flow – $467.72M -$318.87M
EPS (diluted) – $1.80 $-5.13
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $692.48M $32.63M
Total debt $1.84B $609.38B $2.76B
Shares (diluted) – 162.45M 118.16M
Enterprise value $4.21B $1.25B $165.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFIP
P/E 16.1x 13.1x -0.5x
P/FCF 11.8x 8.3x -1.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.1x -5.5x
P/S 5.4x 1.8x 0.5x
P/B 7.5x 2.0x -0.6x
P/Tangible book -9.6x -2.6x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – 1.9x -12.6x
EV/EBIT – 1,169x -6.9x
EV/Revenue – 283.4x 4.6x
EV/FCF – 1,310x -9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 1,291x -53.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.68 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFIP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.2% 72.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% 28.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 22.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 20.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 109.3% -299.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% -40.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 159.7% -273.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.2% -41.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.8% 32.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -138.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.3% -10.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 82.6% -22.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFIP
Gross margin – 34.5% –
EBITDA margin – 15,011% -36.8%
Operating margin – 24.2% –
Pretax margin – 18.6% -66.7%
Net margin – 13.5% -91.9%
FCF margin – 21.6% -48.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 22.0% -8.7%
Return on equity – 16.2% –
Return on assets – 6.4% -8.2%
Return on invested capital – 0.1% -15.3%
Return on capital employed – 12.9% -10.0%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFIP
Debt / assets 43.4% 12,511% 48.1%
Debt / equity 1.2x 314.7x -5.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x -11.3x
Debt / FCF – 1,303x -8.7x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 60.2% 109.0%
Equity / assets 36.9% 39.8% -9.0%
Interest coverage – 0.0x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.5x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.3x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.9x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 2.00 -0.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFIP
Dividend yield 5.5% 3.9% 4.5%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 3.9% 4.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -3.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -4.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABCAAPFIP
Forward P/E 15.0xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $1.94FY2026 $-3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +26.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% +14.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $2.18BFY2026 $701.40MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +39.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +7.7% +18.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABCAAPFIP
Held by institutions 12.3% 15.3% 87.9%
Institutions holding 163 108 176
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +2.6% +4.6%
Institutions buying 77 59 86
Institutions selling 59 35 47
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.69 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABCAAPFIP
OMAB 1.00 0.54 0.21
CAAP 0.54 1.00 0.28
FIP 0.21 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, CAAP and FIP?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.73B, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) $3.86B, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) $327.90M.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, CAAP and FIP?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.2x, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -0.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 12.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +16.2%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) +72.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) has the highest net margin (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.5%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -91.9%). On return on invested capital, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) leads (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 0.1%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.4%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +8.2%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -51.3%. Over five years, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.3%/yr, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +32.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 0.00%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 0.04%. Central North Airport (OMAB) and Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Central North Airport (OMAB) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 35.1%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 70.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, CAAP and FIP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.