OMAB vs CAAP vs FER Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Corporacion America Airports and Ferrovial Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$50.35 -9.8% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$38.80B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Corporacion America Airports leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Corporacion America Airports 5, Ferrovial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABCAAPFERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.78B $3.84B $38.80B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x 13.1x 36.1x CAAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.0x 12.3x 47.1x CAAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.2% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 13.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.6% +29.4% -21.8% CAAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.2%/yr +33.1%/yr +11.4%/yr CAAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.2% 35.1% 25.4% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 53/100 51/100 CAAP

Percentile Scorecard

OMABCAAPFER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABCAAPFER
Valuation 28 #98 of 136 38 #85 of 136 37 #33 of 52
Growth – 88 #16 of 122 –
Profitability – 61 #46 of 116 –
Financial Health 34 #95 of 144 23 #111 of 144 34 #38 of 57
Shareholder Returns 74 #22 of 82 57 #36 of 82 81 #6 of 27
Overall 46 53 51
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CAAP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABCAAPFERSPY
1 month -3.9%-0.1%-9.8% -0.8%
3 months -5.5%-9.3%-19.9% +3.5%
6 months -10.9%-3.8%-25.6% +7.0%
Year to date -9.0%-8.2%-22.1% +12.2%
1 year -3.6%+29.4%-21.8% +13.0%
3 years +74.4%+116.9%+54.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.4%+29.5%+15.7% +23.1%
5 years +102.8%+317.9%+71.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +15.2%+33.1%+11.4% +11.0%
10 years +104.2%—+137.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.4%—+9.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureOMABCAAPFERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.2%35.1%25.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%31.7%24.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.121.431.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.84-0.86 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-26.6%-34.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.7%-21.4%-32.3% -1.8%
52-week high $134.98$30.35$74.38 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$21.62$48.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABCAAPFER
P/E now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 16.1x 13.4xmedian 16.1x 36.1xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.0x 1.8xmedian 1.0x 3.3xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x 1.9xmedian 8.7x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.5x 8.4xmedian 11.5x 18.5xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.81 0.70median 0.81 —median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABCAAPFER
Revenue – $2.16B –
Gross profit – $745.77M –
Operating income – $523.99M –
Net income – $305.55M –
Free cash flow – $467.72M –
EPS (diluted) – $1.80 –
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $692.48M $5.02B
Total debt $1.84B $609.38B $12.25B
Shares (diluted) – 162.45M 718.72M
Enterprise value $4.27B $1.22B $17.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFER
P/E 16.1x 13.4x 36.1x
P/FCF 11.8x 8.4x 18.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.3x –
P/S 5.4x 1.8x 3.3x
P/B 7.5x 2.0x 5.2x
P/Tangible book -9.6x -2.7x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA – 1.9x –
EV/EBIT – 1,169x –
EV/Revenue – 283.4x –
EV/FCF – 1,310x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 1,291x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.70 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFER
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 22.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 20.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 109.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 159.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 82.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFER
Gross margin – 34.5% –
EBITDA margin – 15,011% –
Operating margin – 24.2% –
Pretax margin – 18.6% –
Net margin – 13.5% –
FCF margin – 21.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 22.0% –
Return on equity – 16.2% –
Return on assets – 6.4% –
Return on invested capital – 0.1% –
Return on capital employed – 12.9% –
Asset turnover – 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFER
Debt / assets 43.4% 12,511% 38.0%
Debt / equity 1.2x 314.7x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x –
Debt / FCF – 1,303x –
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 60.2% 78.5%
Equity / assets 36.9% 39.8% 21.5%
Interest coverage – 0.0x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.5x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.3x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.9x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 2.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABCAAPFER
Dividend yield 5.5% 3.8% 2.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 3.8% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABCAAPFER
Forward P/E 15.0xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 47.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $1.94FY2026 $1.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +26.8%FY2026 -20.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% +14.9% +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $2.18BFY2026 $11.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +7.7% -5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABCAAPFER
Held by institutions 12.3% 15.3% 33.2%
Institutions holding 163 108 337
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +2.6% +17.5%
Institutions buying 77 59 208
Institutions selling 59 35 103
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.69 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABCAAPFER
OMAB 1.00 0.54 0.43
CAAP 0.54 1.00 0.43
FER 0.43 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, CAAP and FER?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) $3.84B, Ferrovial (FER) $38.80B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, CAAP and FER?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.1x, Ferrovial (FER) 36.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 12.3x, Ferrovial (FER) 47.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +29.4%, Ferrovial (FER) -21.8%. Over five years, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +33.1%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +11.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 35.1%, Ferrovial (FER) 25.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, CAAP and FER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.