NXTS vs ZEO vs MRNA Stock Comparison

Nexentis Technologies, Zeo Energy and Moderna Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZEO Zeo Energy Corp.
$0.27 -20.6% 1M -83.6% 1Y
Market cap
$8.80M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$71.82M
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
4 wins
MRNA Moderna, Inc.
$222.76 +9.5% 1M +801.9% 1Y
Market cap
$87.87B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.23B
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Moderna leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Moderna 5, Zeo Energy 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNXTSZEOMRNALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $463.08K $8.80M $87.87B MRNA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x -0.8x -27.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.2% -27.6% ZEO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -15.4% -141.4% ZEO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -67.1% -43.3% MRNA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -0.4x 1.5x ZEO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.4% -83.6% +801.9% MRNA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -85.8%/yr — -8.4%/yr MRNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 169.0% 118.5% 130.6% ZEO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 33/100 57/100 MRNA

Percentile Scorecard

NXTSZEOMRNA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNXTSZEOMRNA
Valuation – 24 #40 of 52 70 #191 of 624
Growth 14 #520 of 601 8 #34 of 37 19 #485 of 601
Profitability 40 #323 of 541 14 #32 of 37 58 #230 of 541
Financial Health 43 #369 of 647 32 #39 of 57 54 #296 of 647
Shareholder Returns – 89 #4 of 27 86 #52 of 359
Overall 32 33 57
  • NXTS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ZEO ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • MRNA ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNXTSZEOMRNASPY
1 month -55.0%-20.6%+9.5% +0.7%
3 months -59.4%-48.1%+284.6% +3.7%
6 months -86.8%-71.6%+384.9% +7.1%
Year to date -94.6%-75.2%+655.4% +12.8%
1 year -97.4%-83.6%+801.9% +11.9%
3 years -99.9%-97.6%+200.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year -89.7%-71.2%+44.4% +22.8%
5 years -100.0%—-35.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year -85.8%—-8.4% +10.9%
10 years -100.0%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year -66.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNXTSZEOMRNASPY
Volatility, 1Y 169.0%118.5%130.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 153.5%111.1%79.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.352.372.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.716.14 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-98.2%-93.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.4%-84.6%-9.4% -1.2%
52-week high $24.15$1.75$245.81 $779.14
52-week low $0.53$0.21$22.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNXTSZEOMRNA
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 17.8x -0.9xmedian 28.1x -28.1xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 0.3xmedian 0.8x 39.9xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 15.0x -2.5xmedian 12.7x -27.4xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.7x -3.4xmedian 25.0x -71.4xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 2.2x 2.3xmedian 2.5x 13.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.35 0.02median 0.60 0.43median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNXTSZEOMRNA
Revenue – $71.82M $2.23B
Gross profit – $36.70M $521.00M
Operating income -$5.28M -$11.92M -$3.32B
Net income -$14.06M -$11.05M -$3.15B
Free cash flow – -$6.29M -$1.24B
R&D $532.00K – $2.88B
EPS (diluted) $-17.10 $-0.31 $-7.92
Cash & equivalents $7.62M $2.50M $1.72B
Total debt $3.22M $17.94M $591.00M
Shares (diluted) 816.14K 35.84M 398.00M
Enterprise value -$22.18M -$5.49M $67.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNXTSZEOMRNA
P/E 0.0x -0.9x -28.1x
P/FCF – -3.4x -71.4x
P/Operating cash flow – -3.9x -82.8x
P/S – 0.3x 39.9x
P/B 0.3x 2.3x 13.1x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 2.3x 13.1x
EV/EBITDA 1.5x -2.5x -27.4x
EV/EBIT 1.5x -2.1x -25.4x
EV/Revenue – 0.3x 37.9x
EV/FCF – -4.0x -67.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – -4.6x -78.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 0.02 0.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNXTSZEOMRNA
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.2% -27.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -40.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.8% -67.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -56.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.7% 41.7% -1.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -144.8% -103.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.2% 44.8% -8.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.8% -47.0% -66.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -567.8% 29.1% -5.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -45.2% -39.9% -65.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -497.3% 60.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -44.0% -68.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -257.2% 64.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -46.5% -18.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNXTSZEOMRNA
Gross margin – 51.1% 23.4%
EBITDA margin – -14.0% -138.2%
Operating margin – -16.6% -149.0%
Pretax margin – -15.5% -138.6%
Net margin – -15.4% -141.4%
FCF margin – -8.8% -55.8%
Operating cash flow margin – -7.6% -48.2%
Return on equity -157.0% -96.1% -44.5%
Return on assets -71.9% -19.6% -28.1%
Return on invested capital – -67.1% -43.3%
Return on capital employed -31.5% -27.3% -38.2%
Asset turnover – 1.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.7% 20.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNXTSZEOMRNA
Debt / assets 2.3% 11.0% 5.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.7x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -0.4x 1.5x
Debt / FCF – -1.0x -0.5x
Liabilities / assets 89.8% 83.4% 38.3%
Equity / assets 10.2% 16.6% 61.7%
Interest coverage – -60.1x –
Current ratio 3.7x 1.6x 2.3x
Quick ratio 3.2x 1.2x 2.0x
Cash ratio 3.2x 0.2x 2.0x
Altman Z-score – -0.41 12.91

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNXTSZEOMRNA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 4.9% -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 4.9% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNXTSZEOMRNA
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-8.02FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $2.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +26.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNXTSZEOMRNA
Held by institutions – – 80.2%
Institutions holding – – 785
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +3.4%
Institutions buying – – 402
Institutions selling – – 239
Buyers to sellers – – 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NXTSZEOMRNA
NXTS 1.00 0.07 -0.05
ZEO 0.07 1.00 -0.01
MRNA -0.05 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NXTS, ZEO and MRNA?

Moderna (MRNA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) $463.08K, Zeo Energy (ZEO) $8.80M, Moderna (MRNA) $87.87B.

Which company is growing faster?

Zeo Energy (ZEO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Zeo Energy (ZEO) +10.2%, Moderna (MRNA) -27.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zeo Energy (ZEO) has the highest net margin (Zeo Energy (ZEO) -15.4%, Moderna (MRNA) -141.4%). On return on invested capital, Moderna (MRNA) leads (Zeo Energy (ZEO) -67.1%, Moderna (MRNA) -43.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Moderna (MRNA) returned the most: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -97.4%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) -83.6%, Moderna (MRNA) +801.9%. Over five years, Moderna (MRNA) compounded fastest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -85.8%/yr, Moderna (MRNA) -8.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zeo Energy (ZEO) has been the steadiest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) 169.0%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) 118.5%, Moderna (MRNA) 130.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NXTS, ZEO and MRNA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Moderna (MRNA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.