NXTS vs ABVX vs MRNA Stock Comparison

Nexentis Technologies, Abivax and Moderna Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABVX Abivax S.A.
$86.50 -5.0% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.79B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$76.25M
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
3 wins
MRNA Moderna, Inc.
$198.85 0.0% 1M +643.6% 1Y
Market cap
$79.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.23B
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Moderna leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Moderna 5, Abivax 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNXTSABVXMRNALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $457.04K $6.79B $79.34B MRNA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x -12.9x -25.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -463.2% -27.6% MRNA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -141.4% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -74.9% -43.3% MRNA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.4x 1.5x ABVX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.9% -4.7% +643.6% MRNA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -86.1%/yr — -10.2%/yr MRNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 169.1% 91.2% 131.0% ABVX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 57/100 57/100 ABVX

Percentile Scorecard

NXTSABVXMRNA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNXTSABVXMRNA
Valuation – 77 #65 of 275 71 #81 of 275
Growth 13 #221 of 253 10 #229 of 253 19 #206 of 253
Profitability 42 #130 of 224 30 #158 of 224 57 #96 of 224
Financial Health 44 #165 of 296 84 #48 of 296 54 #136 of 296
Shareholder Returns – 86 #18 of 126 82 #24 of 126
Overall 33 57 57
  • NXTS ranked among 305 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ABVX ranked among 305 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • MRNA ranked among 305 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNXTSABVXMRNASPY
1 month -61.9%-5.0%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -66.5%-32.4%+257.5% +3.5%
6 months -88.4%-22.7%+308.3% +7.0%
Year to date -95.2%-35.9%+574.3% +12.2%
1 year -97.9%-4.7%+643.6% +13.0%
3 years -99.9%+832.1%+176.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -89.6%+110.6%+40.4% +23.1%
5 years -100.0%—-41.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -86.1%—-10.2% +11.0%
10 years -100.0%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year -66.6%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNXTSABVXMRNASPY
Volatility, 1Y 169.1%91.2%131.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 153.3%94.2%79.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.310.952.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.054.91 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-67.5%-93.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.8%-40.5%-19.1% -1.8%
52-week high $26.04$145.31$245.81 $779.14
52-week low $0.53$72.50$22.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNXTSABVXMRNA
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 10.4x -12.9xmedian 10.4x -25.1xmedian 10.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 6.4x -89.1xmedian 6.4x 35.6xmedian 6.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 10.7x -18.6xmedian 10.7x -24.3xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.5x -29.5xmedian 12.5x -63.8xmedian 12.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.6x 16.2xmedian 1.6x 11.7xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.29 —median 0.29 0.39median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNXTSABVXMRNA
Revenue – -$76.25M $2.23B
Gross profit – – $521.00M
Operating income -$5.28M -$341.36M -$3.32B
Net income -$14.06M -$467.93M -$3.15B
Free cash flow – -$230.23M -$1.24B
R&D $532.00K $242.27M $2.88B
EPS (diluted) $-17.10 $-6.73 $-7.92
Cash & equivalents $7.62M $443.17M $1.72B
Total debt $3.22M $156.48K $591.00M
Shares (diluted) 816.14K 69.53M 398.00M
Enterprise value -$22.31M $4.44B $58.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMRNA
P/E 0.0x -12.9x -25.1x
P/FCF – -29.5x -63.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -29.5x -73.9x
P/S – -89.1x 35.6x
P/B 0.2x 16.2x 11.7x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 16.5x 11.7x
EV/EBITDA 1.5x -18.6x -24.3x
EV/EBIT 1.5x -18.5x -22.5x
EV/Revenue – -82.9x 33.6x
EV/FCF – -27.5x -60.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – -27.5x -69.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 – 0.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMRNA
Revenue growth (1Y) – -463.2% -27.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -40.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -67.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -56.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.7% 0.2% -1.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – -103.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.2% -120.1% -8.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.8% – -66.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -567.8% -99.6% -5.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -45.2% – -65.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -56.0% 60.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -68.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -55.6% 64.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMRNA
Gross margin – – 23.4%
EBITDA margin – – -138.2%
Operating margin – – -149.0%
Pretax margin – – -138.6%
Net margin – – -141.4%
FCF margin – – -55.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 301.6% -48.2%
Return on equity -157.0% -102.8% -44.5%
Return on assets -71.9% -81.0% -28.1%
Return on invested capital – -74.9% -43.3%
Return on capital employed -31.5% -68.9% -38.2%
Asset turnover – -0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – -97.6% 20.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMRNA
Debt / assets 2.3% 0.0% 5.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.4x 1.5x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x -0.5x
Liabilities / assets 89.8% 20.8% 38.3%
Equity / assets 10.2% 79.2% 61.7%
Interest coverage – -4.1x –
Current ratio 3.7x 6.0x 2.3x
Quick ratio 3.2x 5.7x 2.0x
Cash ratio 3.2x 5.7x 2.0x
Altman Z-score – 33.72 11.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMRNA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNXTSABVXMRNA
EPS, next fiscal year – $-4.42FY2026 $-7.93FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.07MFY2026 $2.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -5.0%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1,467.2% +26.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNXTSABVXMRNA
Held by institutions – 79.0% 80.2%
Institutions holding – 301 784
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.1% +3.4%
Institutions buying – 189 402
Institutions selling – 99 238
Buyers to sellers – 1.91 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NXTSABVXMRNA
NXTS 1.00 -0.02 -0.05
ABVX -0.02 1.00 0.14
MRNA -0.05 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NXTS, ABVX and MRNA?

Moderna (MRNA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) $457.04K, Abivax (ABVX) $6.79B, Moderna (MRNA) $79.34B.

Which company is growing faster?

Moderna (MRNA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Abivax (ABVX) -463.2%, Moderna (MRNA) -27.6%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Moderna (MRNA) returned the most: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -97.9%, Abivax (ABVX) -4.7%, Moderna (MRNA) +643.6%. Over five years, Moderna (MRNA) compounded fastest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -86.1%/yr, Moderna (MRNA) -10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abivax (ABVX) has been the steadiest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) 169.1%, Abivax (ABVX) 91.2%, Moderna (MRNA) 131.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NXTS, ABVX and MRNA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Moderna (MRNA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.