NXTS vs ABVX vs MDGL Stock Comparison

Nexentis Technologies, Abivax and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABVX Abivax S.A.
$86.50 -5.0% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$76.25M
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 6, Abivax 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNXTSABVXMDGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $465.12K $6.05B $12.83B MDGL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x -12.9x -39.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -463.2% +149.0% MDGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -25.3% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -74.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.4x 1.6x ABVX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.9% -4.7% +3.9% MDGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -86.1%/yr — +42.6%/yr MDGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 169.1% 91.2% 43.6% MDGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 56/100 66/100 MDGL

Percentile Scorecard

NXTSABVXMDGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNXTSABVXMDGL
Valuation – 73 #168 of 626 74 #161 of 626
Growth 13 #526 of 604 8 #556 of 604 68 #194 of 604
Profitability 40 #333 of 555 26 #414 of 555 74 #146 of 555
Financial Health 44 #372 of 658 82 #122 of 658 41 #391 of 658
Shareholder Returns – 89 #41 of 368 75 #92 of 368
Overall 32 56 66
  • NXTS ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ABVX ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • MDGL ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNXTSABVXMDGLSPY
1 month -61.9%-5.0%-15.3% -0.8%
3 months -66.5%-32.4%-20.6% +3.5%
6 months -88.4%-22.7%-15.8% +7.0%
Year to date -95.2%-35.9%-24.8% +12.2%
1 year -97.9%-4.7%+3.9% +13.0%
3 years -99.9%+832.1%+263.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -89.6%+110.6%+53.8% +23.1%
5 years -100.0%—+489.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -86.1%—+42.6% +11.0%
10 years -100.0%—+2,473.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year -66.6%—+38.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNXTSABVXMDGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 169.1%91.2%43.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 153.3%94.2%41.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.310.950.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.050.09 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-67.5%-61.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.8%-40.5%-27.4% -1.8%
52-week high $26.04$145.31$602.83 $779.14
52-week low $0.53$72.50$412.35 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNXTSABVXMDGL
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 17.1x -12.9xmedian 17.1x -39.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 8.8x -89.1xmedian 8.8x 9.9xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 17.1x -18.6xmedian 17.1x -38.4xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x -29.5xmedian 18.0x -61.8xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.1x 16.2xmedian 2.1x 24.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.31 —median 0.31 -2.66median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNXTSABVXMDGL
Revenue – -$76.25M $1.28B
Operating income -$5.28M -$341.36M -$322.62M
Net income -$14.06M -$467.93M -$325.11M
Free cash flow – -$230.23M -$206.29M
R&D $532.00K $242.27M $490.14M
EPS (diluted) $-17.10 $-6.73 $-11.15
Cash & equivalents $7.62M $443.17M $292.73M
Total debt $3.22M $156.48K $340.79M
Shares (diluted) 816.14K 69.53M 29.15M
Enterprise value -$22.18M $3.70B $9.09B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMDGL
P/E 0.0x -12.9x -39.2x
P/FCF – -29.5x -61.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -29.5x -64.5x
P/S – -89.1x 9.9x
P/B 0.2x 16.2x 24.4x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 16.5x 24.7x
EV/EBITDA 1.5x -18.6x -38.4x
EV/EBIT 1.5x -18.5x -38.0x
EV/Revenue – -82.9x 9.5x
EV/FCF – -27.5x -59.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – -27.5x -62.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 – -2.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMDGL
Revenue growth (1Y) – -463.2% 149.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.7% 0.2% -4.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – 0.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.2% -120.1% -15.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.8% – 0.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -567.8% -99.6% 12.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -45.2% – 14.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -56.0% 35.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 10.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -55.6% 33.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMDGL
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – -24.9%
Operating margin – – -25.1%
Pretax margin – – -24.8%
Net margin – – -25.3%
FCF margin – – -16.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 301.6% -15.4%
Return on equity -157.0% -102.8% -59.8%
Return on assets -71.9% -81.0% -25.8%
Return on invested capital – -74.9% –
Return on capital employed -31.5% -68.9% -37.4%
Asset turnover – -0.1x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – -97.6% 9.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMDGL
Debt / assets 2.3% 0.0% 27.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.0x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.4x 1.6x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x -1.7x
Liabilities / assets 89.8% 20.8% 57.9%
Equity / assets 10.2% 79.2% 42.1%
Interest coverage – -4.1x -10.2x
Current ratio 3.7x 6.0x 3.2x
Quick ratio 3.2x 5.7x 2.8x
Cash ratio 3.2x 5.7x 2.2x
Altman Z-score – 33.72 9.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNXTSABVXMDGL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% -0.3%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNXTSABVXMDGL
EPS, next fiscal year – $-4.42FY2026 $-6.25FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.07MFY2026 $1.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -5.0%FY2026 +52.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1,467.2% +36.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNXTSABVXMDGL
Held by institutions – 79.0% 80.9%
Institutions holding – 301 412
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.1% -0.6%
Institutions buying – 189 225
Institutions selling – 99 128
Buyers to sellers – 1.91 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NXTSABVXMDGL
NXTS 1.00 -0.02 0.03
ABVX -0.02 1.00 0.27
MDGL 0.03 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NXTS, ABVX and MDGL?

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) $465.12K, Abivax (ABVX) $6.05B, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) $12.83B.

Which company is growing faster?

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Abivax (ABVX) -463.2%, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) +149.0%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) returned the most: Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -97.9%, Abivax (ABVX) -4.7%, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) +3.9%. Over five years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) compounded fastest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -86.1%/yr, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) +42.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) has been the steadiest (Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) 169.1%, Abivax (ABVX) 91.2%, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) 43.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NXTS, ABVX and MDGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.