NWSA vs ZD vs PSO Stock Comparison

News, Ziff Davis and Pearson Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NWSA News Corp
$30.74 +9.3% 1M +16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.01B
P/E
29.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.03B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
3 wins
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc.
$57.89 +2.0% 1M +51.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.10B
P/E
3.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.32B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
6 wins
PSO Pearson Plc
$18.26 +14.9% 1M +23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$11.92B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ziff Davis leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ziff Davis 6, News 3, Pearson 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNWSAZDPSOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.01B $2.10B $11.92B NWSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.7x 3.3x 26.9x ZD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.6x 10.6x 20.5x ZD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.8% -0.7% — NWSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% 48.6% — ZD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 2.6% — NWSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -2.6x — ZD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.4% +51.5% +23.0% ZD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.0%/yr -14.4%/yr +16.1%/yr PSO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.2% 56.1% 25.4% PSO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 89/100 43/100 ZD

Percentile Scorecard

NWSAZDPSO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNWSAZDPSO
Valuation 57 #24 of 54 96 #3 of 54 42 #32 of 54
Growth 93 #4 of 45 91 #5 of 45 –
Profitability 79 #10 of 43 69 #14 of 43 –
Financial Health 87 #9 of 62 89 #8 of 62 72 #18 of 62
Shareholder Returns 32 #18 of 26 100 #1 of 26 16 #22 of 26
Overall 69 89 43
  • NWSA ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • ZD ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • PSO ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNWSAZDPSOSPY
1 month +9.3%+2.0%+14.9% -1.0%
3 months +14.9%+12.2%+12.2% +2.9%
6 months +17.3%+24.4%+26.2% +6.4%
Year to date +17.7%+64.7%+30.1% +11.4%
1 year +16.4%+51.5%+23.0% +13.1%
3 years +43.2%-4.5%+64.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +12.7%-1.5%+18.1% +21.5%
5 years +27.7%-54.0%+110.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.0%-14.4%+16.1% +10.9%
10 years +129.2%-1.3%+92.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +8.7%-0.1%+6.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureNWSAZDPSOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.2%56.1%25.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.6%41.9%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.190.590.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.630.920.90 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.7%-80.1%-32.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.4%-2.1%-0.8% -2.5%
52-week high $31.19$59.13$18.40 $779.14
52-week low $22.40$26.51$12.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNWSAZDPSO
P/E now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 18.8x 3.3xmedian 18.8x 26.9xmedian 18.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.1x 4.5xmedian 11.1x —median 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 9.4x 6.4xmedian 9.4x 14.0xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.6x 0.9xmedian 1.6x 2.4xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.51median 0.44 0.03median 0.44 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNWSAZDPSO
Revenue $9.03B $1.32B –
Gross profit – $1.12B –
Operating income – $72.68M –
Net income $743.00M $643.49M –
Free cash flow $811.00M $316.73M –
R&D – $57.65M –
EPS (diluted) $1.03 $17.69 –
Cash & equivalents $2.10B $1.61B $448.46M
Total debt $1.99B $867.64M $1.99B
Shares (diluted) 558.40M 36.38M 660.30M
Enterprise value $8.49B -$1.10B $9.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNWSAZDPSO
P/E 29.9x 3.3x 26.9x
P/FCF 21.1x 6.4x 14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 13.8x 4.5x –
P/S 1.9x 1.5x 2.5x
P/B 1.9x 0.9x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 1.0x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 4.5x –
EV/EBIT 16.3x 17.7x –
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.0x –
EV/FCF 21.0x 4.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.7x 2.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.51 0.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNWSAZDPSO
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.8% -0.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% -1.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -2.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -6.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -27.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -44.6% 873.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.4% 89.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -50.4% 1,055% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 58.6% 106.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 26.5% 31.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.8% 14.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.0% 35.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 18.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNWSAZDPSO
Gross margin – 84.9% –
EBITDA margin 17.0% 21.5% –
Operating margin – 5.5% –
Pretax margin 11.6% -1.9% –
Net margin 6.3% 48.6% –
FCF margin 9.0% 23.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 13.7% 33.8% –
Return on equity 8.0% 33.5% –
Return on assets 4.8% 17.9% –
Return on invested capital 6.6% 2.6% –
Return on capital employed 8.2% 2.7% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 0.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNWSAZDPSO
Debt / assets 12.8% 21.7% 22.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.4x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -2.6x –
Debt / FCF 2.5x 2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 40.6% 44.0% 43.3%
Equity / assets 59.4% 56.0% 56.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 2.2x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.1x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.8x 1.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.53 2.07 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNWSAZDPSO
Dividend yield 0.7% – 1.9%
Net buyback yield 3.7% 13.6% –
Shareholder yield 4.4% 13.6% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNWSAZDPSO
Forward P/E 24.6xFY2027 10.6xFY2026 20.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.25FY2027 $5.44FY2026 $0.89FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2027 -17.9%FY2026 +3.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% +4.0% +23.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.16BFY2027 $1.15BFY2026 $5.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.4%FY2027 -20.6%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +0.6% +6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNWSAZDPSO
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 4.1%
Institutions holding 636 267 213
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.3% -2.6% +3.0%
Institutions buying 344 116 138
Institutions selling 189 106 36
Buyers to sellers 1.82 1.09 3.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NWSAZDPSO
NWSA 1.00 0.16 0.40
ZD 0.16 1.00 0.20
PSO 0.40 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NWSA, ZD and PSO?

News (NWSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: News (NWSA) $17.01B, Ziff Davis (ZD) $2.10B, Pearson (PSO) $11.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, NWSA, ZD and PSO?

Ziff Davis (ZD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (News (NWSA) 29.7x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 3.3x, Pearson (PSO) 26.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ziff Davis (ZD) is cheapest (News (NWSA) 24.6x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 10.6x, Pearson (PSO) 20.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

News (NWSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: News (NWSA) +6.8%, Ziff Davis (ZD) -0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ziff Davis (ZD) has the highest net margin (News (NWSA) 6.3%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 48.6%). On return on invested capital, News (NWSA) leads (News (NWSA) 6.6%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ziff Davis (ZD) returned the most: News (NWSA) +16.4%, Ziff Davis (ZD) +51.5%, Pearson (PSO) +23.0%. Over five years, Pearson (PSO) compounded fastest (News (NWSA) +5.0%/yr, Ziff Davis (ZD) -14.4%/yr, Pearson (PSO) +16.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pearson (PSO) has been the steadiest (News (NWSA) 26.2%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 56.1%, Pearson (PSO) 25.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NWSA, ZD and PSO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ziff Davis (ZD) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.