NWPX vs VLTO vs CLWT Stock Comparison

NWPX Infrastructure, Veralto and Euro Tech Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VLTO Veralto Corp
$103.97 +7.6% 1M +4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$27.42B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.80B
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

NWPX Infrastructure leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (NWPX Infrastructure 5, Veralto 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNWPXVLTOCLWTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $933.58M $27.42B $9.96M VLTO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.5x 27.4x 61.9x NWPX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.9x 22.9x — NWPX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.9% +6.4% — NWPX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +76.0% +4.5% +11.5% NWPX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +32.8%/yr — -16.9%/yr NWPX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.0% 23.3% 89.1% VLTO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

NWPXVLTOCLWT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNWPXVLTOCLWT
Valuation 100 #1 of 21 70 #7 of 21 85 #4 of 21
Growth 94 #2 of 19 50 #10 of 19 –
Profitability 80 #4 of 16 – –
Financial Health 70 #7 of 21 – 65 #8 of 21
Shareholder Returns 56 #5 of 10 – –
Overall 80 – –
  • NWPX ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • VLTO ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • CLWT ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNWPXVLTOCLWTSPY
1 month -4.3%+7.6%-2.2% +0.7%
3 months -22.8%+9.8%-11.7% +3.7%
6 months -0.3%+17.9%+8.8% +7.1%
Year to date +56.8%+4.2%+13.3% +12.8%
1 year +76.0%+4.5%+11.5% +11.9%
3 years +253.8%+52.1%-4.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +52.4%+15.0%-1.4% +22.8%
5 years +312.5%—-60.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +32.8%—-16.9% +10.9%
10 years +647.0%—-47.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +22.3%—-6.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNWPXVLTOCLWTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.0%23.3%89.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.4%21.9%76.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.300.23-0.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.900.190.13 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.8%-27.6%-72.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.6%-0.9%-36.7% -1.2%
52-week high $149.94$104.87$2.15 $779.14
52-week low $53.85$82.23$1.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNWPXVLTOCLWT
P/E now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 25.4x 25.4xmedian 25.4x 61.9xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.5x 4.4xmedian 2.5x 0.8xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 17.9x —median 17.9x —median 17.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 22.3x 22.1xmedian 22.3x -7.1xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.8x —median 1.8x 0.6xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.54median 1.73 4.62median 1.73 —median 1.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNWPXVLTOCLWT
Revenue $602.76M $5.80B –
Gross profit $125.97M $3.49B –
Operating income $71.15M $1.27B –
Net income $53.48M – –
Free cash flow $86.83M – –
R&D – $278.00M –
EPS (diluted) $5.45 $4.08 –
Cash & equivalents $6.06M – $4.28M
Total debt $21.50M – –
Shares (diluted) 9.81M 245.80M 7.60M
Enterprise value $891.67M $27.42B -$9.14M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNWPXVLTOCLWT
P/E 17.7x 25.4x 61.9x
P/FCF 10.9x 22.1x -7.1x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x – –
P/S 1.6x 4.4x 0.8x
P/B 2.2x – 0.6x
P/Tangible book 2.3x – 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.3x – –
EV/EBIT 13.5x – –
EV/Revenue 1.6x 4.4x –
EV/FCF 11.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.54 4.62 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNWPXVLTOCLWT
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.9% 6.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 5.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.8% 6.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.2% 6.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 47.2% -0.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.2% 3.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 46.0% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 46.1% 11.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.7% 5.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 58.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 43.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 80.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 92.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNWPXVLTOCLWT
Gross margin 20.9% – –
EBITDA margin 15.4% – –
Operating margin 11.8% – –
Pretax margin 11.4% – –
Net margin 8.9% – –
FCF margin 14.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 17.7% – –
Return on equity 12.5% – –
Return on assets 7.9% – –
Return on invested capital 12.5% – –
Return on capital employed 12.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.9x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNWPXVLTOCLWT
Debt / assets 3.1% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 37.0% – 22.3%
Equity / assets 63.0% – 77.7%
Interest coverage 48.6x – –
Current ratio 2.6x – 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.8x – 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.9x
Altman Z-score 4.40 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNWPXVLTOCLWT
Dividend yield – 0.5% –
Net buyback yield 0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 0.5% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNWPXVLTOCLWT
Forward P/E 18.9xFY2026 22.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.19FY2026 $4.54FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +45.8%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -7.5% +7.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $573.90MFY2026 $5.70BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +9.1%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +3.8% +16.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNWPXVLTOCLWT
Held by institutions 89.5% 96.1% –
Institutions holding 225 975 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% +3.3% –
Institutions buying 125 399 –
Institutions selling 65 385 –
Buyers to sellers 1.92 1.04 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NWPXVLTOCLWT
NWPX 1.00 0.01 -0.01
VLTO 0.01 1.00 -0.05
CLWT -0.01 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NWPX, VLTO and CLWT?

Veralto (VLTO) is the largest by market capitalisation: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) $933.58M, Veralto (VLTO) $27.42B, Euro Tech Holdings (CLWT) $9.96M.

Which stock is cheaper, NWPX, VLTO and CLWT?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 17.5x, Veralto (VLTO) 27.4x, Euro Tech Holdings (CLWT) 61.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) is cheapest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 18.9x, Veralto (VLTO) 22.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +15.9%, Veralto (VLTO) +6.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) returned the most: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +76.0%, Veralto (VLTO) +4.5%, Euro Tech Holdings (CLWT) +11.5%. Over five years, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) compounded fastest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +32.8%/yr, Euro Tech Holdings (CLWT) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Veralto (VLTO) has been the steadiest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 40.0%, Veralto (VLTO) 23.3%, Euro Tech Holdings (CLWT) 89.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NWPX, VLTO and CLWT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.