NTRB vs BHC vs AMPH Stock Comparison

NutriBand, Bausch Health Companies and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTRB NutriBand Inc.
$5.97 -25.4% 1M -16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$73.42M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 6, Bausch Health Companies 3, NutriBand 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTRBBHCAMPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $73.42M $2.37B $1.12B BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.5x -2.2x 14.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.6x 1.3x 8.2x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -37.3% +10.1% +1.0% BHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -430.4% -10.1% 10.8% AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.6% 6.4% AMPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x 8.9x 1.8x NTRB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.5% +2.6% +3.9% AMPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr -25.5%/yr +6.8%/yr AMPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 54.8% 54.3% AMPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 60/100 73/100 AMPH

Percentile Scorecard

NTRBBHCAMPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTRBBHCAMPH
Valuation 53 #295 of 626 99 #9 of 626 99 #8 of 626
Growth 43 #346 of 604 44 #341 of 604 43 #347 of 604
Profitability 35 #360 of 555 84 #90 of 555 87 #72 of 555
Financial Health 68 #210 of 658 15 #561 of 658 37 #412 of 658
Shareholder Returns – – 99 #4 of 368
Overall 50 60 73
  • NTRB ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AMPH ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTRBBHCAMPHSPY
1 month -25.4%+11.8%-2.5% -0.8%
3 months +100.3%+41.6%+32.8% +3.5%
6 months +53.5%+14.0%+17.6% +7.0%
Year to date +31.5%-8.5%-4.9% +12.2%
1 year -16.5%+2.6%+3.9% +13.0%
3 years +182.9%-3.2%-42.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +41.5%-1.1%-17.1% +23.1%
5 years +20.1%-77.1%+38.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.7%-25.5%+6.8% +11.0%
10 years —-70.9%+40.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-11.6%+3.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNTRBBHCAMPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%54.8%54.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.6%48.0%66.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.030.880.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.210.050.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.7%-84.9%-74.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.6%-19.5%-13.4% -1.8%
52-week high $8.99$7.90$29.40 $779.14
52-week low $2.81$4.43$16.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTRBBHCAMPH
P/E now vs peer median -10.4xmedian 17.1x -2.2xmedian 17.1x 14.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 44.9xmedian 8.8x 0.2xmedian 8.8x 1.5xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -10.0xmedian 17.1x 10.0xmedian 17.1x 8.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.0xmedian 18.0x 1.7xmedian 18.0x 7.1xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 2.1x -1.3xmedian 2.1x 1.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -12.69median 0.31 0.03median 0.31 -5.53median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTRBBHCAMPH
Revenue $1.62M $10.85B $730.02M
Gross profit $536.12K $7.80B $348.11M
Operating income -$7.05M $883.00M $114.29M
Net income -$6.96M -$1.10B $78.55M
Free cash flow -$3.63M $1.43B $152.89M
R&D $1.21M $663.00M $94.57M
EPS (diluted) $-0.57 $-2.90 $1.78
Cash & equivalents $3.42M $1.83B $223.61M
Total debt $647.66K $20.74B $612.05M
Shares (diluted) 12.16M 378.10M 44.23M
Enterprise value $56.11M -$3.37B -$24.25M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCAMPH
P/E -10.4x -2.2x 14.2x
P/FCF -20.0x 1.7x 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow -20.0x 1.3x 5.9x
P/S 44.9x 0.2x 1.5x
P/B 13.6x -1.3x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 14.1x -0.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA -10.0x 10.0x 8.0x
EV/EBIT -9.8x 24.1x 12.3x
EV/Revenue 42.8x 2.0x 1.9x
EV/FCF -19.1x 14.9x 9.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -19.1x 11.8x 7.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -12.69 0.03 -5.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCAMPH
Revenue growth (1Y) -37.3% 10.1% 1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.8% 9.1% 10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -39.5% 11.8% -3.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -16.5% 9.8% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.3% -44.7% -37.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 14.1% -4.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 32.2% -1,721% -41.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.8% -76.0% -8.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 80.0% -1,206% -36.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.8% -79.0% -2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.9% 19.5% 15.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.7% 83.8% 12.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.6% 28.3% 36.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.5% 62.6% 15.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCAMPH
Gross margin 33.1% 71.8% 47.7%
EBITDA margin -426.5% 19.6% 23.9%
Operating margin -435.6% 8.1% 15.7%
Pretax margin -430.4% -6.7% 14.0%
Net margin -430.4% -10.1% 10.8%
FCF margin -224.5% 13.2% 20.9%
Operating cash flow margin -224.5% 16.6% 25.3%
Return on equity -123.0% – 10.2%
Return on assets -105.6% -4.4% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – 4.6% 6.4%
Return on capital employed -123.9% 4.4% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x -1.6x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 204.1% 2.1% 4.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCAMPH
Debt / assets 2.4% 83.7% 35.1%
Debt / equity 0.0x -11.7x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x 8.9x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 0.0x 14.5x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 15.3% 107.1% 55.9%
Equity / assets 84.7% -7.1% 44.1%
Interest coverage -339.3x 0.5x 4.4x
Current ratio 4.2x 1.4x 2.4x
Quick ratio 3.8x 0.9x 1.7x
Cash ratio 3.8x 0.4x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 31.41 0.09 2.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCAMPH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 9.0%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 9.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTRBBHCAMPH
Forward P/E 3.6xFY2026 1.3xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.65FY2026 $4.86FY2026 $3.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +26.9%FY2026 -4.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +112.1% -13.4% +9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $90.32MFY2026 $11.45BFY2026 $790.23MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4,334.5%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +109.8% -0.5% -5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTRBBHCAMPH
Held by institutions – 63.3% 64.8%
Institutions holding – 221 209
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% -11.7%
Institutions buying – 99 96
Institutions selling – 63 74
Buyers to sellers – 1.57 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTRBBHCAMPH
NTRB 1.00 0.04 0.04
BHC 0.04 1.00 0.18
AMPH 0.04 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTRB, BHC and AMPH?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: NutriBand (NTRB) $73.42M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.37B, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.12B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NutriBand (NTRB) -37.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (NutriBand (NTRB) -430.4%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 10.8%). On return on invested capital, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) returned the most: NutriBand (NTRB) -16.5%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +2.6%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +3.9%. Over five years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) compounded fastest (NutriBand (NTRB) +3.7%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.5%/yr, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has been the steadiest (NutriBand (NTRB) 80.1%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.8%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTRB, BHC and AMPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.