NTRB vs BHC vs ALVO Stock Comparison

NutriBand, Bausch Health Companies and Alvotech Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTRB NutriBand Inc.
$6.64 -19.5% 1M -4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$75.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
4 wins
ALVO Alvotech
$4.89 -17.4% 1M -38.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.94M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Bausch Health Companies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bausch Health Companies 4, NutriBand 4, Alvotech 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTRBBHCALVOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $75.37M $3.09B $1.35B BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.8x -3.7x -5.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.0x 1.8x — BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -37.3% — -74.3% NTRB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -430.4% — -248.0% ALVO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x — 13.1x NTRB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.2% +50.7% -38.1% BHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.3%/yr -20.6%/yr -13.2%/yr NTRB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 60.6% 81.7% BHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 — 48/100 NTRB

Percentile Scorecard

NTRBBHCALVO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTRBBHCALVO
Valuation 56 #278 of 624 97 #19 of 624 72 #173 of 624
Growth 43 #344 of 601 34 #399 of 601 34 #395 of 601
Profitability 36 #346 of 541 – 69 #170 of 541
Financial Health 68 #207 of 647 – 15 #549 of 647
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 51 – 48
  • NTRB ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ALVO ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTRBBHCALVOSPY
1 month -19.5%+53.3%-17.4% +0.7%
3 months +128.2%+47.4%+37.0% +3.7%
6 months +71.6%+55.4%+46.4% +7.1%
Year to date +46.3%+27.9%-4.7% +12.8%
1 year -4.2%+50.7%-38.1% +11.9%
3 years +210.3%+32.9%-43.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +45.9%+9.9%-17.5% +22.8%
5 years +23.6%-68.3%-50.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +4.3%-20.6%-13.2% +10.9%
10 years —-56.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-7.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNTRBBHCALVOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%60.6%81.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 73.9%47.7%86.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.030.830.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.050.84-0.47 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.7%-84.9%-82.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.1%0.0%-38.1% -1.2%
52-week high $8.99$8.89$7.90 $779.14
52-week low $2.81$4.43$3.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTRBBHCALVO
P/E now vs peer median -11.6xmedian 17.8x -4.0xmedian 17.8x -5.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 49.9xmedian 9.1x 0.2xmedian 9.1x 14.4xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.2xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x 30.3xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.2xmedian 21.7x 1.5xmedian 21.7x -5.8xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x -8.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -14.12median 0.35 -0.72median 0.35 -0.22median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTRBBHCALVO
Revenue $1.62M – $105.94M
Gross profit $536.12K – $7.66M
Operating income -$7.05M $1.25B $47.54M
Net income -$6.96M – -$179.60M
Free cash flow -$3.63M – -$261.39M
R&D $1.21M $638.00M $46.37M
EPS (diluted) $-0.57 $-2.22 $-0.90
Cash & equivalents $3.42M – $142.80M
Total debt $647.66K – $1.31B
Shares (diluted) 12.16M 378.10M 291.34M
Enterprise value $58.05M $3.09B $912.42M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCALVO
P/E -11.6x -4.0x -5.4x
P/FCF -22.2x 1.5x -5.8x
P/Operating cash flow -22.2x – -7.7x
P/S 49.9x 0.2x 14.4x
P/B 15.1x – -8.0x
P/Tangible book 15.6x – -4.6x
EV/EBITDA -11.2x – 30.3x
EV/EBIT -11.0x – 56.6x
EV/Revenue 47.9x – 25.4x
EV/FCF -21.3x – -10.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -21.3x – -13.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -14.12 -0.72 -0.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCALVO
Revenue growth (1Y) -37.3% – -74.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.8% – 104.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -39.5% – -95.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -16.5% – 27.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.3% -34.3% -13.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 50.6% 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 32.2% – -383.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.8% – 24.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 80.0% -330.7% -481.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.8% 5.5% 24.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.9% – -367.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.7% – 12.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.6% – -113.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.5% – 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCALVO
Gross margin 33.1% – 7.2%
EBITDA margin -426.5% – 83.9%
Operating margin -435.6% – 44.9%
Pretax margin -430.4% – -62.1%
Net margin -430.4% – -248.0%
FCF margin -224.5% – -246.7%
Operating cash flow margin -224.5% – -187.6%
Return on equity -123.0% – –
Return on assets -105.6% – -17.5%
Return on invested capital – – 4.4%
Return on capital employed -123.9% – 4.1%
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 204.1% – 8.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCALVO
Debt / assets 2.4% – 82.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x – -6.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x – 13.1x
Debt / FCF 0.0x – -5.0x
Liabilities / assets 15.3% – 112.1%
Equity / assets 84.7% – -12.1%
Interest coverage -339.3x – 0.8x
Current ratio 4.2x – 1.6x
Quick ratio 3.8x – 1.1x
Cash ratio 3.8x – 0.4x
Altman Z-score 36.48 – -1.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTRBBHCALVO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTRBBHCALVO
Forward P/E 4.0xFY2026 1.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.65FY2026 $4.86FY2026 $-0.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +26.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +112.1% -13.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $90.32MFY2026 $11.45BFY2026 $556.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4,334.5%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +109.8% -0.5% +23.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTRBBHCALVO
Held by institutions – 63.3% 14.7%
Institutions holding – 221 72
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% +152.4%
Institutions buying – 99 44
Institutions selling – 63 17
Buyers to sellers – 1.57 2.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTRBBHCALVO
NTRB 1.00 0.06 0.18
BHC 0.06 1.00 0.11
ALVO 0.18 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTRB, BHC and ALVO?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: NutriBand (NTRB) $75.37M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.09B, Alvotech (ALVO) $1.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

NutriBand (NTRB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NutriBand (NTRB) -37.3%, Alvotech (ALVO) -74.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alvotech (ALVO) has the highest net margin (NutriBand (NTRB) -430.4%, Alvotech (ALVO) -248.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bausch Health Companies (BHC) returned the most: NutriBand (NTRB) -4.2%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +50.7%, Alvotech (ALVO) -38.1%. Over five years, NutriBand (NTRB) compounded fastest (NutriBand (NTRB) +4.3%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -20.6%/yr, Alvotech (ALVO) -13.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) has been the steadiest (NutriBand (NTRB) 79.1%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 60.6%, Alvotech (ALVO) 81.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTRB, BHC and ALVO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.