NTPIF vs AWCA vs KANP Stock Comparison

Nam Tai Property, Awaysis Capital and Kaanapali Land Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTPIF Nam Tai Property Inc.
$4.30 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$266.06M
P/E
2,364x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins
AWCA Awaysis Capital, Inc.
$0.02 -50.0% 1M -91.7% 1Y
Market cap
$8.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.34M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
KANP Kaanapali Land Llc
$29.70 -7.2% 1M -17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$53.24M
P/E
5.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.83M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Kaanapali Land leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Kaanapali Land 6, Nam Tai Property 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTPIFAWCAKANPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $266.06M $8.19M $53.24M NTPIF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2,364x -3.2x 5.2x KANP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +371.3% +1,110.9% KANP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -190.5% 48.2% KANP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -3.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -91.7% -17.5% NTPIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -29.5%/yr -19.7%/yr +4.3%/yr KANP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.8% 345.1% 35.8% KANP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 29/100 99/100 KANP

Percentile Scorecard

NTPIFAWCAKANP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTPIFAWCAKANP
Valuation 16 #33 of 39 5 #37 of 39 100 #1 of 39
Growth – 87 #5 of 32 100 #1 of 32
Profitability – 7 #27 of 29 96 #2 of 29
Financial Health 30 #27 of 38 16 #32 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 29 99
  • NTPIF ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • AWCA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • KANP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTPIFAWCAKANPSPY
1 month 0.0%-50.0%-7.2% +0.9%
3 months -2.3%-33.3%-1.0% +5.9%
6 months -14.9%-71.4%+16.4% +8.5%
Year to date 0.0%-83.3%+8.0% +13.3%
1 year 0.0%-91.7%-17.5% +12.4%
3 years +4.6%-95.6%+24.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +1.5%-64.6%+7.5% +23.5%
5 years -82.6%-66.7%+23.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -29.5%-19.7%+4.3% +11.0%
10 years -42.7%-66.7%+3.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year -5.4%-10.4%+0.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureNTPIFAWCAKANPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.8%345.1%35.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.6%662.7%74.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.05-0.830.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.00-0.27-0.49 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-98.7%-42.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.5%-91.7%-17.5% -0.9%
52-week high $5.85$0.24$36.00 $779.14
52-week low $3.85$0.02$25.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTPIFAWCAKANP
P/E now vs peer median 2,364xmedian 7.8x -3.2xmedian 7.8x 5.2xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 4.9x 6.1xmedian 4.9x 2.4xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x -7.0xmedian 11.2x 3.2xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.9xmedian 6.2x -26.9xmedian 6.2x 3.1xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.3xmedian 0.6x 0.6xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 -0.10median 0.32 0.17median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTPIFAWCAKANP
Revenue – $1.34M $21.83M
Gross profit – $576.01K $9.58M
Operating income – -$2.58M $4.63M
Net income – -$2.55M $10.53M
Free cash flow – -$304.62K $16.94M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.01 $5.71
Cash & equivalents $43.50M $1.13M $37.96M
Total debt $629.83M $30.64M –
Shares (diluted) 60.90M 409.07M 1.85M
Enterprise value $84.68M $6.69M -$56.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAKANP
P/E 2,364x -3.2x 5.2x
P/FCF -10.9x -26.9x 3.1x
P/Operating cash flow – -28.6x 3.0x
P/S 5.4x 6.1x 2.4x
P/B 1.4x 1.3x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.3x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -7.0x 3.2x
EV/EBIT – -6.6x 3.3x
EV/Revenue – 12.7x 0.7x
EV/FCF – -55.9x 0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – -59.4x 0.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.10 0.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAKANP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 371.3% 1,111%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 49.5% 63.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 18.7% 2,581%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 67.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 2.0% 181.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.9% 43.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.2% 392.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 30.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 12.9% 392.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 33.6% 30.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 93.1% 524.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.2% 84.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 94.1% 369.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.4% 78.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAKANP
Gross margin – 43.0% 43.9%
EBITDA margin – -181.2% 21.9%
Operating margin – -192.5% 21.2%
Pretax margin – -190.5% 45.9%
Net margin – -190.5% 48.2%
FCF margin – -22.8% 77.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -21.4% 80.5%
Return on equity – -37.9% 11.8%
Return on assets – -14.4% 10.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -37.5% –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.1x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 208.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAKANP
Debt / assets 36.0% 54.7% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -3.6x –
Debt / FCF – -32.7x –
Liabilities / assets 61.6% 64.6% 8.6%
Equity / assets 38.4% 35.4% 91.4%
Interest coverage – -135.0x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x –
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.1x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – -1.16 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAKANP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTPIFAWCAKANP

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTPIFAWCAKANP
Held by institutions 9.7% – –
Institutions holding 2 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ – – –
Institutions buying 0 – –
Institutions selling 0 – –
Buyers to sellers – – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTPIFAWCAKANP
NTPIF 1.00 -0.07 0.05
AWCA -0.07 1.00 -0.05
KANP 0.05 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTPIF, AWCA and KANP?

Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) $266.06M, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) $8.19M, Kaanapali Land (KANP) $53.24M.

Which stock is cheaper, NTPIF, AWCA and KANP?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 2,364x, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -3.2x, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 5.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) +371.3%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +1,110.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) has the highest net margin (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -190.5%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 48.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) returned the most: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 0.0%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -91.7%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) -17.5%. Over five years, Kaanapali Land (KANP) compounded fastest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -29.5%/yr, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -19.7%/yr, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kaanapali Land (KANP) has been the steadiest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 36.8%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) 345.1%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 35.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTPIF, AWCA and KANP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kaanapali Land (KANP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.