NTAP vs SRAD vs ANET Stock Comparison

NetApp, Sportradar Group AG and Arista Networks Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$227.58 +13.1% 1M +94.2% 1Y
Market cap
$43.83B
P/E
30.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
6 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.23 -7.6% 1M -54.9% 1Y
Market cap
$12.86B
P/E
644.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.
$187.06 -9.4% 1M +19.3% 1Y
Market cap
$234.76B
P/E
58.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.54B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 6, Arista Networks 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTAPSRADANETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $43.83B $12.86B $234.76B ANET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.9x 644.8x 58.0x NTAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.7x 47.0x 46.9x NTAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.2% +24.7% +32.6% ANET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.2% 1.2% 38.4% ANET
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 36.7% -8.6% — NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 1.4x — NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +94.2% -54.9% +19.3% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.5%/yr -9.5%/yr +49.1%/yr ANET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.8% 56.5% 55.0% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 60/100 66/100 ANET

Percentile Scorecard

NTAPSRADANET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTAPSRADANET
Valuation 42 #65 of 112 79 #27 of 124 20 #90 of 112
Growth 52 #53 of 109 63 #43 of 113 85 #17 of 109
Profitability 92 #9 of 104 70 #33 of 109 90 #11 of 104
Financial Health 28 #84 of 116 56 #57 of 127 77 #27 of 116
Shareholder Returns 70 #25 of 81 31 #45 of 65 58 #35 of 81
Overall 57 60 66
  • NTAP ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ANET ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTAPSRADANETSPY
1 month +13.1%-7.6%-9.4% -0.2%
3 months +30.4%-17.5%+10.2% +3.9%
6 months +110.2%-1.0%+13.2% +8.2%
Year to date +112.5%-48.5%+42.8% +12.9%
1 year +94.2%-54.9%+19.3% +12.3%
3 years +216.9%+39.8%+324.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +46.9%+11.8%+62.0% +23.3%
5 years +153.7%-39.2%+635.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +20.5%-9.5%+49.1% +10.9%
10 years +573.3%—+3,436.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +21.0%—+42.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNTAPSRADANETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.8%56.5%55.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.8%64.3%56.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.380.562.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.10-0.970.35 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-69.0%-50.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-54.9%-13.6% -1.2%
52-week high $239.18$27.11$216.61 $779.14
52-week low $94.11$11.56$116.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTAPSRADANET
P/E now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 33.2x 635.9xmedian 38.6x 58.3xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 4.4x 22.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 20.0x -13.9xmedian 34.5x 48.0xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 29.8x 7.5xmedian 29.4x 45.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 29.8xmedian 3.0x 4.3xmedian 3.3x 15.9xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.84median 1.17 21.97median 1.28 1.77median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTAPSRADANET
Revenue $7.39B $1.62B $10.54B
Gross profit $5.22B – $6.64B
Operating income $1.85B – $4.55B
Net income $1.42B $19.94M $4.04B
Free cash flow $1.65B $510.26M $5.16B
R&D $1.02B $44.37M $1.37B
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $64,328.88 $3.17
Cash & equivalents $1.57B $286.82M $2.29B
Total debt $2.49B $49.28M –
Shares (diluted) 200.00M 310.00 1.28B
Enterprise value $26.64B $11.15B $188.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTAPSRADANET
P/E 31.5x 635.9x 58.3x
P/FCF 27.0x 7.5x 45.8x
P/Operating cash flow 23.5x 7.6x 44.5x
P/S 6.0x 2.4x 22.4x
P/B 29.8x 4.3x 15.9x
P/Tangible book 30.6x 4.3x 15.9x
EV/EBITDA 21.4x -13.9x 48.0x
EV/EBIT 23.5x -41.3x 49.0x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 2.1x 21.1x
EV/FCF 26.4x 6.8x 43.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.9x 6.9x 41.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.84 21.97 1.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSRADANET
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.2% 24.7% 32.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 23.9% 26.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% – 30.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.9% – 28.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 35.6% – 32.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% – 33.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% -83.5% 24.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 51.8% 33.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.9% -94.7% 23.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 28.9% 32.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% 15.0% 31.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 30.5% 75.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.5% 15.7% 29.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 30.7% 76.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSRADANET
Gross margin 70.6% – 63.0%
EBITDA margin 27.5% -15.4% 44.0%
Operating margin 25.0% – 43.1%
Pretax margin 24.7% 1.4% 47.3%
Net margin 19.2% 1.2% 38.4%
FCF margin 22.3% 31.6% 48.9%
Operating cash flow margin 25.7% 31.0% 50.3%
Return on equity 99.6% 2.1% 28.6%
Return on assets 13.1% 0.7% 17.8%
Return on invested capital 36.7% -8.6% –
Return on capital employed 29.4% -3.5% 28.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 25.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 4.2% 4.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTAPSRADANET
Debt / assets 22.7% 0.4% –
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 1.4x –
Debt / FCF 1.5x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 86.4% 69.5% 37.6%
Equity / assets 13.6% 30.5% 62.4%
Interest coverage – -0.8x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x 3.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.9x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.6x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 4.21 1.75 18.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTAPSRADANET
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield 1.7% -1.0% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 2.6% -1.0% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTAPSRADANET
Forward P/E 21.7xFY2026 47.0xFY2026 46.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.50FY2026 $0.26FY2026 $3.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.2%FY2026 -27.8%FY2026 +33.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% +100.0% +36.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.49BFY2026 $1.65BFY2026 $13.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026 +46.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +10.8% +22.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTAPSRADANET
Held by institutions 97.4% 17.8% 71.2%
Institutions holding 959 151 2,254
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% -2.8% +2.4%
Institutions buying 501 88 1,328
Institutions selling 336 42 732
Buyers to sellers 1.49 2.10 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTAPSRADANET
NTAP 1.00 0.08 0.40
SRAD 0.08 1.00 0.08
ANET 0.40 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTAP, SRAD and ANET?

Arista Networks (ANET) is the largest by market capitalisation: NetApp (NTAP) $43.83B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.86B, Arista Networks (ANET) $234.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, NTAP, SRAD and ANET?

NetApp (NTAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NetApp (NTAP) 30.9x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 644.8x, Arista Networks (ANET) 58.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, NetApp (NTAP) is cheapest (NetApp (NTAP) 21.7x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 47.0x, Arista Networks (ANET) 46.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Arista Networks (ANET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Arista Networks (ANET) +32.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Arista Networks (ANET) has the highest net margin (NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Arista Networks (ANET) 38.4%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: NetApp (NTAP) +94.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -54.9%, Arista Networks (ANET) +19.3%. Over five years, Arista Networks (ANET) compounded fastest (NetApp (NTAP) +20.5%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.5%/yr, Arista Networks (ANET) +49.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%, Arista Networks (ANET) 55.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTAP, SRAD and ANET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.