NTAP vs SMCI vs SRAD Stock Comparison

NetApp, Super Micro Computer and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$223.66 +9.4% 1M +93.0% 1Y
Market cap
$42.83B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
6 wins
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$35.81 -14.3% 1M -31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$20.75B
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.06B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.30 -1.4% 1M -53.8% 1Y
Market cap
$12.61B
P/E
632.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 6, Super Micro Computer 4, Sportradar Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTAPSMCISRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $42.83B $20.75B $12.61B NTAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.2x 9.3x 632.3x SMCI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x 7.9x 47.3x SMCI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.2% +77.8% +24.7% SMCI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.2% 5.7% 1.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 36.7% 17.0% -8.6% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — 1.4x NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +93.0% -31.6% -53.8% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.2%/yr +58.9%/yr -10.1%/yr SMCI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.8% 95.7% 56.5% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 58/100 60/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

NTAPSMCISRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTAPSMCISRAD
Valuation 41 #66 of 111 66 #38 of 111 79 #27 of 124
Growth 52 #52 of 108 73 #30 of 108 60 #46 of 113
Profitability 93 #8 of 104 55 #47 of 104 71 #32 of 109
Financial Health 29 #82 of 115 68 #37 of 115 56 #57 of 127
Shareholder Returns 73 #22 of 78 25 #59 of 78 32 #43 of 63
Overall 58 58 60
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SMCI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTAPSMCISRADSPY
1 month +9.4%-14.3%-1.4% +0.9%
3 months +29.1%+39.3%-17.7% +5.9%
6 months +105.9%+36.1%-2.5% +8.5%
Year to date +108.9%+22.3%-48.3% +13.3%
1 year +93.0%-31.6%-53.8% +12.4%
3 years +211.5%+48.3%+40.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +46.1%+14.1%+12.0% +23.5%
5 years +150.5%+911.6%-41.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +20.2%+58.9%-10.1% +11.0%
10 years +562.5%+1,367.6%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +20.8%+30.8%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureNTAPSMCISRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.8%95.7%56.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.8%98.1%64.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.384.030.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.07-0.33-0.95 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-84.8%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.5%-32.0%-53.8% -0.9%
52-week high $239.18$52.69$26.64 $779.14
52-week low $94.11$20.53$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTAPSMCISRAD
P/E now vs peer median 30.9xmedian 33.5x 9.7xmedian 33.5x 639.6xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 2.8x 0.6xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x -14.0xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.6xmedian 29.8x -3.4xmedian 29.8x 7.5xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 29.3xmedian 2.9x 1.6xmedian 2.9x 4.3xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.77median 1.10 0.24median 1.10 22.09median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTAPSMCISRAD
Revenue $7.39B $39.06B $1.62B
Gross profit $5.22B $4.23B –
Operating income $1.85B $2.77B –
Net income $1.42B $2.23B $19.94M
Free cash flow $1.65B -$6.97B $510.26M
R&D $1.02B $771.23M $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $3.20 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $1.57B $7.52B $286.82M
Total debt $2.49B $2.00B $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 200.00M 697.35M 310.00
Enterprise value $25.64B $3.65B $10.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTAPSMCISRAD
P/E 30.9x 9.7x 639.6x
P/FCF 26.6x -3.4x 7.5x
P/Operating cash flow 23.1x -3.5x 7.7x
P/S 5.9x 0.6x 2.4x
P/B 29.3x 1.6x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 30.1x 1.6x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 21.0x – -14.0x
EV/EBIT 23.1x 6.5x -41.6x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 0.5x 2.2x
EV/FCF 25.9x -2.6x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.5x -2.6x 7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.77 0.24 22.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSMCISRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.2% 77.8% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 76.3% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% 74.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 48.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 35.6% 121.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% 53.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% 112.7% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 51.6% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.9% 91.6% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 40.9% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% -510.4% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.0% -130.6% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.5% -555.0% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.5% -135.9% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSMCISRAD
Gross margin 70.6% 10.8% –
EBITDA margin 27.5% – -15.4%
Operating margin 25.0% 7.1% –
Pretax margin 24.7% 7.1% 1.4%
Net margin 19.2% 5.7% 1.2%
FCF margin 22.3% -17.8% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin 25.7% -17.4% 31.0%
Return on equity 99.6% 20.2% 2.1%
Return on assets 13.1% 8.4% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 36.7% 17.0% -8.6%
Return on capital employed 29.4% 14.2% -3.5%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x -3.1x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 1.1% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTAPSMCISRAD
Debt / assets 22.7% 6.7% 0.4%
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – 1.4x
Debt / FCF 1.5x -0.3x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 86.4% 51.6% 69.5%
Equity / assets 13.6% 48.4% 30.5%
Interest coverage – 14.2x -0.8x
Current ratio 1.2x 3.9x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.9x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.8x 1.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 4.16 3.61 1.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTAPSMCISRAD
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield 1.7% -6.2% -1.0%
Shareholder yield 2.6% -6.2% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTAPSMCISRAD
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2026 7.9xFY2027 47.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.50FY2026 $4.52FY2027 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.2%FY2026 +24.5%FY2027 -27.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% +21.7% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.49BFY2026 $74.04BFY2027 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2026 +89.6%FY2027 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +5.0% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTAPSMCISRAD
Held by institutions 97.4% 68.0% 17.8%
Institutions holding 959 774 151
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% +32.3% -2.8%
Institutions buying 501 450 88
Institutions selling 336 233 42
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.93 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTAPSMCISRAD
NTAP 1.00 0.37 0.08
SMCI 0.37 1.00 0.05
SRAD 0.08 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTAP, SMCI and SRAD?

NetApp (NTAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: NetApp (NTAP) $42.83B, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) $20.75B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, NTAP, SMCI and SRAD?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NetApp (NTAP) 30.2x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 9.3x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 632.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) is cheapest (NetApp (NTAP) 21.3x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 7.9x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 47.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +77.8%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 5.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 17.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: NetApp (NTAP) +93.0%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) -31.6%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.8%. Over five years, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) compounded fastest (NetApp (NTAP) +20.2%/yr, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +58.9%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -10.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 95.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTAP, SMCI and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.