NOC vs LDOS vs TAYD Stock Comparison

Northrop Grumman, Leidos Holdings and Taylor Devices Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$139.91 +13.2% 1M -26.3% 1Y
Market cap
$17.55B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.63B
Div. yield
0.01%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc.
$56.00 -11.4% 1M +23.5% 1Y
Market cap
$180.66M
P/E
26.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.03M
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Northrop Grumman leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Northrop Grumman 5, Leidos Holdings 4, Taylor Devices 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNOCLDOSTAYDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $80.02B $17.55B $180.66M NOC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.7x 12.8x 26.4x LDOS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x 11.0x 18.9x LDOS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.5% +3.4% -12.5% NOC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.4% 7.8% 17.5% TAYD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.2% 13.9% — LDOS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 2.3x — NOC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% NOC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.6% -26.3% +23.5% TAYD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.8%/yr +7.2%/yr +36.6%/yr TAYD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.6% 35.6% 56.6% NOC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 70/100 62/100 LDOS

Percentile Scorecard

NOCLDOSTAYD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNOCLDOSTAYD
Valuation 74 #27 of 100 98 #3 of 100 79 #22 of 100
Growth 39 #60 of 97 57 #42 of 97 16 #82 of 97
Profitability 77 #23 of 96 85 #15 of 96 93 #8 of 96
Financial Health 39 #65 of 105 34 #70 of 105 95 #6 of 105
Shareholder Returns 59 #27 of 64 75 #17 of 64 30 #45 of 64
Overall 57 70 62
  • NOC ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • LDOS ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • TAYD ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNOCLDOSTAYDSPY
1 month +10.8%+13.2%-11.4% -0.8%
3 months +3.3%+21.6%+1.0% +3.5%
6 months -1.7%-3.0%-2.0% +7.0%
Year to date -0.8%-22.4%-4.2% +12.2%
1 year -6.6%-26.3%+23.5% +13.0%
3 years +19.5%+54.6%+146.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +6.1%+15.6%+35.1% +23.1%
5 years +45.7%+41.4%+374.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.8%+7.2%+36.6% +11.0%
10 years +147.9%+235.6%+292.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.5%+12.9%+14.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNOCLDOSTAYDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.6%35.6%56.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.3%37.3%63.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.260.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.740.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.4%-50.3%-52.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.4%-29.9%-37.7% -1.8%
52-week high $768.02$199.55$89.95 $779.14
52-week low $473.40$100.00$43.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNOCLDOSTAYD
P/E now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 26.8x 12.8xmedian 26.8x 26.5xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.9x 1.0xmedian 2.9x 4.6xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 15.2x 9.8xmedian 15.2x 18.5xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 25.5x 8.1xmedian 25.5x 14.9xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.5x 3.3xmedian 2.5x 2.5xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 17.45median 0.94 0.45median 0.94 13.16median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNOCLDOSTAYD
Revenue $43.59B $17.63B $39.03M
Gross profit $8.73B $3.14B $16.07M
Operating income $4.63B $2.03B $5.14M
Net income $4.52B $1.40B $6.83M
Free cash flow $3.83B $2.16B $12.13M
R&D – – $847.25K
EPS (diluted) $31.74 $10.92 $2.16
Cash & equivalents $3.74B $748.00M $3.60M
Total debt $58.43B $21.66B –
Shares (diluted) 142.40M 126.00M 3.16M
Enterprise value $67.47B $14.26B $7.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNOCLDOSTAYD
P/E 17.8x 12.8x 26.5x
P/FCF 21.0x 8.1x 14.9x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 7.6x 12.6x
P/S 1.8x 1.0x 4.6x
P/B 4.3x 3.3x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 4.0x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.8x 9.8x 18.5x
EV/EBIT 19.7x 11.3x 25.7x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 1.3x 3.4x
EV/FCF 23.8x 10.6x 10.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.3x 9.9x 9.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.45 0.45 13.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNOCLDOSTAYD
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.5% 3.4% -12.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 5.9% -1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 4.8% -21.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 14.4% -3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.8% -0.4% -42.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 21.1% -12.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.5% -0.8% -23.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 24.8% -1.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.3% 1.3% -23.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 28.6% 2.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 53.2% 54.9% 24.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.5% 35.7% 10.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 108.8% 63.2% 34.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 41.7% 15.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNOCLDOSTAYD
Gross margin 20.0% 17.8% 41.2%
EBITDA margin 14.1% 13.2% 18.3%
Operating margin 10.6% 11.5% 13.2%
Pretax margin 12.0% 10.2% 17.5%
Net margin 10.4% 7.8% 17.5%
FCF margin 8.8% 12.3% 31.1%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% 13.0% 36.7%
Return on equity 24.7% 26.8% 9.3%
Return on assets 8.8% 9.0% 8.6%
Return on invested capital 12.2% 13.9% –
Return on capital employed 12.2% 16.5% 7.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.6x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNOCLDOSTAYD
Debt / assets 27.5% 38.6% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 3.8x 2.8x –
Liabilities / assets 64.4% 65.9% 9.4%
Equity / assets 35.6% 34.1% 90.6%
Interest coverage 7.1x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.6x 8.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 7.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 6.4x
Altman Z-score 3.12 3.20 16.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNOCLDOSTAYD
Dividend yield 1.7% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield 0.7% 3.7% -1.1%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 5.0% -1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.2% 15.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 10.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.0% 3.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 2.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNOCLDOSTAYD
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2026 11.0xFY2026 18.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $30.81FY2026 $12.75FY2026 $2.96FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.0%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.7% -9.0% +32.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $42.95BFY2026 $17.52BFY2026 $55.10MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.4%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026 +32.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.7% +14.9% +13.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNOCLDOSTAYD
Held by institutions 83.4% 79.3% 34.8%
Institutions holding 1,809 773 68
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +4.1% +8.0%
Institutions buying 840 380 44
Institutions selling 639 294 14
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.29 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NOCLDOSTAYD
NOC 1.00 0.42 0.01
LDOS 0.42 1.00 0.08
TAYD 0.01 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NOC, LDOS and TAYD?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Northrop Grumman (NOC) $80.02B, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) $17.55B, Taylor Devices (TAYD) $180.66M.

Which stock is cheaper, NOC, LDOS and TAYD?

Leidos Holdings (LDOS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 17.7x, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 12.8x, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 26.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) is cheapest (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 18.4x, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 11.0x, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 18.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Northrop Grumman (NOC) +6.5%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +3.4%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) -12.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Taylor Devices (TAYD) has the highest net margin (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 10.4%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 7.8%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 17.5%). On return on invested capital, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) leads (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 12.2%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 13.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Taylor Devices (TAYD) returned the most: Northrop Grumman (NOC) -6.6%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) -26.3%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) +23.5%. Over five years, Taylor Devices (TAYD) compounded fastest (Northrop Grumman (NOC) +7.8%/yr, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +7.2%/yr, Taylor Devices (TAYD) +36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) has the highest dividend yield: Northrop Grumman (NOC) 0.02%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 0.01%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 0.00%. Taylor Devices (TAYD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Northrop Grumman (NOC) has been the steadiest (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 28.6%, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 35.6%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 56.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NOC, LDOS and TAYD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Northrop Grumman (NOC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.