NNDM vs SSYS vs STKH Stock Comparison

Nano Dimension, Stratasys and Steakholder Foods Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.42 -9.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$294.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
4 wins
SSYS Stratasys Ltd.
$7.15 -14.9% 1M -38.0% 1Y
Market cap
$573.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$547.27M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Nano Dimension leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Nano Dimension 4, Stratasys 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNNDMSSYSSTKHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $294.13M $573.66M $52.10K SSYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.7x -12.5x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 71.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +73.5% -3.1% — NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -349.5% -8.4% — SSYS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -28.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.0% -38.0% -89.5% NNDM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -24.8%/yr -25.7%/yr -83.4%/yr NNDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.1% 47.7% 225.6% SSYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 37/100 — NNDM

Percentile Scorecard

NNDMSSYSSTKH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNNDMSSYSSTKH
Valuation 39 #125 of 203 36 #131 of 203 –
Growth 56 #84 of 188 21 #148 of 188 –
Profitability 7 #172 of 184 13 #161 of 184 –
Financial Health 91 #20 of 217 79 #46 of 217 75 #55 of 217
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 48 37 –
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SSYS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • STKH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNNDMSSYSSTKHSPY
1 month -9.0%-14.9%-76.7% +0.9%
3 months -4.7%-6.8%-86.0% +5.9%
6 months -15.0%-15.6%-79.5% +8.5%
Year to date -7.8%-17.6%-83.5% +13.3%
1 year -16.0%-38.0%-89.5% +12.4%
3 years -45.2%-30.2%-99.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year -18.2%-11.3%-88.9% +23.5%
5 years -75.9%-77.3%-100.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -24.8%-25.7%-83.4% +11.0%
10 years -97.9%-62.4%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -32.2%-9.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureNNDMSSYSSTKHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.1%47.7%225.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.8%46.6%172.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.102.231.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.30-0.80-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.4%-83.4%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.6%-38.5%-91.2% -0.9%
52-week high $2.14$11.62$4.30 $779.14
52-week low $1.23$6.80$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNNDMSSYSSTKH
P/E now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 25.4x -12.7xmedian 25.4x —median 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.9x 1.1xmedian 1.9x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 14.3x -12.2xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 21.8x -26.5xmedian 21.8x —median 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.2x 0.8xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.41 -29.23median 1.41 —median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNNDMSSYSSTKH
Revenue $120.89M $547.27M –
Gross profit $46.88M $221.15M –
Operating income -$143.53M -$83.46M –
Net income -$139.91M -$115.18M –
Free cash flow -$51.44M -$23.24M –
R&D $29.99M $77.20M –
EPS (diluted) $-2.02 $-0.56 –
Cash & equivalents $349.11M $92.53M $1.06M
Total debt $14.82M – –
Shares (diluted) 209.34M 82.30M 124.02K
Enterprise value -$917.04M -$376.15M -$6.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNNDMSSYSSTKH
P/E -0.7x -12.7x –
P/FCF -5.8x -26.5x –
P/Operating cash flow -5.9x -134.4x –
P/S 2.5x 1.1x –
P/B 0.6x 0.8x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 0.8x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 0.3x -12.2x –
EV/EBIT 0.3x -4.8x –
EV/Revenue -0.4x 0.7x –
EV/FCF 0.9x -17.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 0.9x -88.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -29.23 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNNDMSSYSSTKH
Revenue growth (1Y) 73.5% -3.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.6% -4.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 88.5% -12.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.7% -6.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.4% -30.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.0% -9.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -154.9% -17.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -37.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) -112.0% 59.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -428.7% 0.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.6% -172.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 61.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% -116.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 36.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNNDMSSYSSTKH
Gross margin 38.8% 40.4% –
EBITDA margin -117.1% -6.1% –
Operating margin -118.7% -15.3% –
Pretax margin -121.7% -13.1% –
Net margin -349.5% -8.4% –
FCF margin -42.6% -4.2% –
Operating cash flow margin -41.9% -0.8% –
Return on equity -33.8% -14.0% –
Return on assets -28.9% -10.9% –
Return on invested capital -28.1% – –
Return on capital employed -27.7% -9.3% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 0.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.6% 4.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNNDMSSYSSTKH
Debt / assets 0.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – –
Debt / FCF -0.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 13.5% 22.0% 27.9%
Equity / assets 86.5% 78.0% 72.1%
Interest coverage -341.7x – –
Current ratio 10.7x 3.5x 1.8x
Quick ratio 8.0x 2.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 7.5x 1.3x 1.2x
Altman Z-score – -0.98 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNNDMSSYSSTKH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNNDMSSYSSTKH
Forward P/E – 71.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.10FY2026 $-550.39FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -33.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +100.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $582.47MFY2026 $57.45MFY2025
Revenue growth, next FY – +5.7%FY2026 +574,390.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after – +6.8% -42.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNNDMSSYSSTKH
Held by institutions 31.9% 50.8% –
Institutions holding 107 150 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.9% +7.3% –
Institutions buying 51 79 –
Institutions selling 25 29 –
Buyers to sellers 2.04 2.72 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NNDMSSYSSTKH
NNDM 1.00 0.38 0.00
SSYS 0.38 1.00 0.00
STKH 0.00 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NNDM, SSYS and STKH?

Stratasys (SSYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nano Dimension (NNDM) $294.13M, Stratasys (SSYS) $573.66M, Steakholder Foods (STKH) $52.10K.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%, Stratasys (SSYS) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Stratasys (SSYS) has the highest net margin (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%, Stratasys (SSYS) -8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nano Dimension (NNDM) returned the most: Nano Dimension (NNDM) -16.0%, Stratasys (SSYS) -38.0%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -89.5%. Over five years, Nano Dimension (NNDM) compounded fastest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -24.8%/yr, Stratasys (SSYS) -25.7%/yr, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -83.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Stratasys (SSYS) has been the steadiest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) 53.1%, Stratasys (SSYS) 47.7%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) 225.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NNDM, SSYS and STKH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.