NNDM vs PRLB vs DDD Stock Comparison

Nano Dimension, Proto Labs and 3D Systems Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.43 -8.9% 1M -17.8% 1Y
Market cap
$301.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
1 win
PRLB Proto Labs Inc
$89.35 -7.2% 1M +64.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.14B
P/E
70.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$560.54M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
6 wins
DDD 3D Systems Corp
$3.03 -15.1% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$503.43M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$387.64M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Proto Labs leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Proto Labs 6, 3D Systems 2, Nano Dimension 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNNDMPRLBDDDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $301.50M $2.14B $503.43M PRLB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.7x 70.3x -8.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 39.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +73.5% +10.2% -6.2% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -349.5% 5.4% -14.2% PRLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -28.1% — -17.8% DDD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — 1.0x DDD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.8% +64.4% -1.3% PRLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -24.6%/yr +8.8%/yr -35.9%/yr PRLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.1% 46.9% 84.1% PRLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 59/100 31/100 PRLB

Percentile Scorecard

NNDMPRLBDDD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNNDMPRLBDDD
Valuation 39 #125 of 203 32 #138 of 203 15 #172 of 203
Growth 55 #86 of 188 83 #32 of 188 57 #81 of 188
Profitability 7 #171 of 183 50 #93 of 183 11 #163 of 183
Financial Health 91 #20 of 217 95 #11 of 217 65 #77 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 35 #100 of 153 5 #145 of 153
Overall 48 59 31
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PRLB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • DDD ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNNDMPRLBDDDSPY
1 month -8.9%-7.2%-15.1% -0.2%
3 months -4.0%+19.3%+19.8% +3.9%
6 months -18.3%+40.3%+37.7% +8.2%
Year to date -7.1%+76.6%+71.2% +12.9%
1 year -17.8%+64.4%-1.3% +12.3%
3 years -44.8%+283.8%-14.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -18.0%+56.6%-5.2% +23.3%
5 years -75.7%+52.4%-89.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -24.6%+8.8%-35.9% +10.9%
10 years -97.9%+90.7%-78.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -32.1%+6.7%-14.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNNDMPRLBDDDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.1%46.9%84.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.9%39.0%75.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.102.072.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.341.37-0.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.4%-65.6%-96.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.2%-9.4%-21.9% -1.2%
52-week high $2.14$98.64$3.88 $779.14
52-week low $1.23$46.81$1.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNNDMPRLBDDD
P/E now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 25.2x 70.3xmedian 25.2x -8.2xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.9x 3.8xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 14.0x 28.7xmedian 14.0x -12.1xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.9xmedian 21.7x 37.7xmedian 21.7x -9.6xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.3x 3.1xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.32 2.20median 1.32 -0.31median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNNDMPRLBDDD
Revenue $120.89M $560.54M $387.64M
Gross profit $46.88M $254.60M $131.01M
Operating income -$143.53M $36.81M -$61.26M
Net income -$139.91M $30.48M -$54.85M
Free cash flow -$51.44M $56.66M -$52.40M
R&D $29.99M $42.36M $47.60M
EPS (diluted) $-2.02 $1.25 $-0.37
Cash & equivalents $349.11M $127.92M $127.95M
Total debt $14.82M – $91.18M
Shares (diluted) 209.34M 24.42M 148.97M
Enterprise value -$909.67M $1.61B $99.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNNDMPRLBDDD
P/E -0.7x 70.3x -8.2x
P/FCF -5.9x 37.7x -9.6x
P/Operating cash flow -6.0x 27.2x -11.9x
P/S 2.5x 3.8x 1.3x
P/B 0.6x 3.1x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 3.2x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 0.3x 28.7x -12.1x
EV/EBIT 0.3x 54.2x -7.6x
EV/Revenue -0.4x 3.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF 0.9x 35.2x -8.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 0.9x 25.4x -11.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 2.20 -0.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNNDMPRLBDDD
Revenue growth (1Y) 73.5% 10.2% -6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.6% 4.9% -9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 88.5% 13.3% -9.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.7% 6.8% -13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.4% 121.9% 76.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.0% 33.2% 21.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -154.9% 105.8% 62.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 31.6% 23.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -112.0% 103.1% 53.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -428.7% 32.0% 26.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.6% 10.6% 38.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 7.7% 18.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% -14.0% 36.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 11.9% 20.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNNDMPRLBDDD
Gross margin 38.8% 45.4% 33.8%
EBITDA margin -117.1% 12.4% -10.0%
Operating margin -118.7% 6.6% -15.8%
Pretax margin -121.7% 7.6% -11.7%
Net margin -349.5% 5.4% -14.2%
FCF margin -42.6% 10.1% -13.5%
Operating cash flow margin -41.9% 14.0% -10.9%
Return on equity -33.8% 4.4% -21.7%
Return on assets -28.9% 3.9% -10.5%
Return on invested capital -28.1% – -17.8%
Return on capital employed -27.7% 5.2% -14.7%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.6x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 6.6% 2.6% 3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNNDMPRLBDDD
Debt / assets 0.6% – 17.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – 1.0x
Debt / FCF -0.1x – -1.7x
Liabilities / assets 13.5% 12.6% 48.9%
Equity / assets 86.5% 87.4% 51.1%
Interest coverage -341.7x – –
Current ratio 10.7x 3.6x 3.4x
Quick ratio 8.0x 3.2x 1.9x
Cash ratio 7.5x 2.0x 1.2x
Altman Z-score – 14.49 -1.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNNDMPRLBDDD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.6% -10.6%
Shareholder yield – 0.6% -10.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNNDMPRLBDDD
Forward P/E – 39.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.29FY2026 $-0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +38.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +10.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $612.40MFY2026 $368.77MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +14.9%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.8% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNNDMPRLBDDD
Held by institutions 31.9% 93.7% 71.1%
Institutions holding 107 276 210
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.9% +1.7% +34.8%
Institutions buying 51 145 126
Institutions selling 25 89 37
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.63 3.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NNDMPRLBDDD
NNDM 1.00 0.32 0.29
PRLB 0.32 1.00 0.47
DDD 0.29 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NNDM, PRLB and DDD?

Proto Labs (PRLB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nano Dimension (NNDM) $301.50M, Proto Labs (PRLB) $2.14B, 3D Systems (DDD) $503.43M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%, Proto Labs (PRLB) +10.2%, 3D Systems (DDD) -6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Proto Labs (PRLB) has the highest net margin (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%, Proto Labs (PRLB) 5.4%, 3D Systems (DDD) -14.2%). On return on invested capital, 3D Systems (DDD) leads (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -28.1%, 3D Systems (DDD) -17.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Proto Labs (PRLB) returned the most: Nano Dimension (NNDM) -17.8%, Proto Labs (PRLB) +64.4%, 3D Systems (DDD) -1.3%. Over five years, Proto Labs (PRLB) compounded fastest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -24.6%/yr, Proto Labs (PRLB) +8.8%/yr, 3D Systems (DDD) -35.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Proto Labs (PRLB) has been the steadiest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) 53.1%, Proto Labs (PRLB) 46.9%, 3D Systems (DDD) 84.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NNDM, PRLB and DDD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Proto Labs (PRLB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.