NLST vs P vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Netlist, Everpure and NetApp Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NLST Netlist Inc
$6.47 +15.9% 1M +895.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.18B
P/E
2,672x
Revenue (TTM)
$332.69M
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins
P Everpure, Inc.
$131.41 +4.3% 1M +40.1% 1Y
Market cap
$46.26B
P/E
182.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
2 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$222.08 +10.4% 1M +90.4% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 4, Netlist 4, Everpure 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNLSTPNTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.18B $46.26B $44.64B P
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2,672x 182.7x 31.5x NTAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.0x 44.4x 21.2x NLST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +129.2% +27.2% +12.2% NLST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% 5.9% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 36.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -40.8x — -0.5x NLST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +895.4% +40.1% +90.4% NLST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.5%/yr +37.8%/yr +20.3%/yr P
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.0% 73.0% 44.8% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 51/100 56/100 NTAP

Percentile Scorecard

NLSTPNTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNLSTPNTAP
Valuation 8 #102 of 111 16 #93 of 111 41 #66 of 111
Growth 93 #9 of 108 78 #25 of 108 51 #53 of 108
Profitability 37 #66 of 104 64 #38 of 104 91 #10 of 104
Financial Health 53 #55 of 115 33 #77 of 115 27 #84 of 115
Shareholder Returns 33 #55 of 81 61 #32 of 81 70 #25 of 81
Overall 45 51 56
  • NLST ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • P ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNLSTPNTAPSPY
1 month +15.9%+4.3%+10.4% -0.8%
3 months +167.4%+77.1%+30.8% +3.5%
6 months +196.8%+77.7%+104.8% +7.0%
Year to date +627.0%+96.1%+107.4% +12.2%
1 year +895.4%+40.1%+90.4% +13.0%
3 years +499.1%+298.8%+209.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +81.7%+58.6%+45.7% +23.1%
5 years -12.1%+396.8%+151.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.5%+37.8%+20.3% +11.0%
10 years +462.6%+948.8%+553.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +18.9%+26.5%+20.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNLSTPNTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.0%73.0%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.3%82.7%38.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.002.621.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 8.530.552.02 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.2%-48.6%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.2%-16.3%-7.1% -1.8%
52-week high $6.90$156.95$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $0.54$56.99$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNLSTPNTAP
P/E now vs peer median 2,604xmedian 32.0x 172.7xmedian 32.0x 30.7xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 2.8x 10.3xmedian 2.8x 5.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3,122xmedian 19.4x 111.4xmedian 19.4x 20.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -139.1xmedian 29.0x 341.7xmedian 29.0x 26.4xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 93.1xmedian 2.9x 28.4xmedian 2.9x 29.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 99.37median 1.13 0.31median 1.13 3.74median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNLSTPNTAP
Revenue $332.69M $4.26B $7.39B
Gross profit $54.02M $2.97B $5.22B
Operating income $408.00K $224.21M $1.85B
Net income $789.00K $253.29M $1.42B
Free cash flow -$15.53M $128.17M $1.65B
R&D $3.92M $1.05B $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $0.73 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $30.66M $385.69M $1.57B
Total debt $10.94M – $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 370.75M 345.59M 200.00M
Enterprise value $2.09B $40.67B $27.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNLSTPNTAP
P/E 2,604x 172.7x 30.7x
P/FCF -139.1x 341.7x 26.4x
P/Operating cash flow -139.2x 102.4x 22.9x
P/S 6.5x 10.3x 5.9x
P/B 93.1x 28.4x 29.1x
P/Tangible book 93.1x 28.9x 29.9x
EV/EBITDA 3,122x 111.4x 20.9x
EV/EBIT 5,227x 190.8x 23.0x
EV/Revenue 6.4x 10.0x 5.7x
EV/FCF -137.3x 333.8x 25.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -137.4x 100.0x 22.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 99.37 0.31 3.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNLSTPNTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 129.2% 27.2% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 64.2% 15.5% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1,221% 28.3% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 127.6% 15.5% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 101.1% 195.6% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.2% 277.6% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 102.1% 82.0% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.3% 574.2% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 101.6% 77.8% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.2% 550.0% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 48.8% -46.6% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.4% -13.6% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 48.8% -76.7% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -34.5% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNLSTPNTAP
Gross margin 16.2% 69.7% 70.6%
EBITDA margin 0.2% 9.0% 27.5%
Operating margin 0.1% 5.3% 25.0%
Pretax margin 0.2% 6.6% 24.7%
Net margin 0.2% 5.9% 19.2%
FCF margin -4.7% 3.0% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin -4.7% 10.0% 25.7%
Return on equity 4.7% 17.0% 99.6%
Return on assets 1.0% 5.1% 13.1%
Return on invested capital – – 36.7%
Return on capital employed 1.3% 8.0% 29.4%
Asset turnover 4.1x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -19.7x 1.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 12.9% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNLSTPNTAP
Debt / assets 3.8% – 22.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -40.8x – -0.5x
Debt / FCF -0.2x – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 68.4% 70.5% 86.4%
Equity / assets 31.6% 29.5% 13.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.5x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 24.05 8.07 4.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNLSTPNTAP
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield -1.2% 0.6% 1.7%
Shareholder yield -1.2% 0.6% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNLSTPNTAP
Forward P/E 7.0xFY2026 44.4xFY2026 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.92FY2026 $2.96FY2026 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +43.7%FY2026 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% +48.6% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $691.20MFY2026 $4.74BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +266.4%FY2026 +29.5%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.3% +41.5% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNLSTPNTAP
Held by institutions 0.0% 83.0% 97.4%
Institutions holding 4 804 959
Change in shares held, QoQ +146.0% +2.2% -1.0%
Institutions buying 3 442 501
Institutions selling 0 259 336
Buyers to sellers – 1.71 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NLSTPNTAP
NLST 1.00 0.22 0.18
P 0.22 1.00 0.55
NTAP 0.18 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NLST, P and NTAP?

Everpure (P) is the largest by market capitalisation: Netlist (NLST) $2.18B, Everpure (P) $46.26B, NetApp (NTAP) $44.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, NLST, P and NTAP?

NetApp (NTAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Netlist (NLST) 2,672x, Everpure (P) 182.7x, NetApp (NTAP) 31.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Netlist (NLST) is cheapest (Netlist (NLST) 7.0x, Everpure (P) 44.4x, NetApp (NTAP) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Netlist (NLST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Netlist (NLST) +129.2%, Everpure (P) +27.2%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Netlist (NLST) 0.2%, Everpure (P) 5.9%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Netlist (NLST) returned the most: Netlist (NLST) +895.4%, Everpure (P) +40.1%, NetApp (NTAP) +90.4%. Over five years, Everpure (P) compounded fastest (Netlist (NLST) -2.5%/yr, Everpure (P) +37.8%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Netlist (NLST) 105.0%, Everpure (P) 73.0%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NLST, P and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.