NKE vs AS vs BIRK Stock Comparison

Nike, Amer Sports and Birkenstock Holding Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NKE NIKE, Inc.
$37.32 +3.5% 1M -46.4% 1Y
Market cap
$56.24B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.89B
Div. yield
0.04%
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
AS Amer Sports, Inc.
$28.26 +5.0% 1M -10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$15.84B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.44B
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc
$32.56 +3.3% 1M -24.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.10B
P/E
15.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.64B
Div. yield
–
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Birkenstock Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Birkenstock Holding 4, Nike 3, Amer Sports 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNKEASBIRKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $56.24B $15.84B $6.10B NKE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.2x 29.0x 15.6x BIRK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.6x 22.8x 14.0x BIRK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.2% +30.5% +19.6% AS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.7% 7.3% 14.8% BIRK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 9.7% 9.7% NKE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -0.4x 1.3x AS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.4% -10.7% -24.5% AS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.6%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 39.8% 52.1% NKE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 60/100 69/100 BIRK

Percentile Scorecard

NKEASBIRK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNKEASBIRK
Valuation 36 #30 of 46 42 #20 of 34 56 #21 of 46
Growth 12 #38 of 43 100 #1 of 32 81 #9 of 43
Profitability 54 #20 of 42 94 #3 of 32 78 #10 of 42
Financial Health 58 #23 of 53 59 #14 of 33 62 #21 of 53
Shareholder Returns 58 #15 of 34 6 #17 of 18 –
Overall 43 60 69
  • NKE ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • AS ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • BIRK ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNKEASBIRKSPY
1 month +3.5%+5.0%+3.3% -1.0%
3 months -10.3%-16.6%-19.9% +2.9%
6 months -16.5%-21.1%-17.4% +6.4%
Year to date -41.4%-24.3%-20.4% +11.4%
1 year -46.4%-10.7%-24.5% +13.1%
3 years -64.5%—-16.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year -29.2%—-5.7% +21.5%
5 years -77.2%—— +67.7%
5 years, per year -25.6%—— +10.9%
10 years -27.9%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year -3.2%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureNKEASBIRKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%39.8%52.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.6%38.0%50.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.581.501.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.27-0.27-0.47 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.9%-40.7%-51.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.4%-32.7%-33.5% -2.5%
52-week high $69.68$41.96$48.97 $779.14
52-week low $33.90$26.25$30.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNKEASBIRK
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 15.9x 28.7xmedian 21.3x 15.5xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 2.1xmedian 1.1x 2.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 9.2x 10.9xmedian 10.1x 7.9xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.3xmedian 12.2x 22.7xmedian 11.4x 15.3xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.2x 2.3xmedian 1.5x 1.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.28median 0.57 —median 0.34 0.50median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNKEASBIRK
Revenue $45.89B $7.44B $2.64B
Gross profit $19.77B $4.45B $1.50B
Operating income $3.76B $956.70M $640.37M
Net income $3.09B $567.80M $391.83M
Free cash flow $2.11B $694.70M $391.32M
EPS (diluted) $2.08 $0.97 $2.10
Cash & equivalents $6.90B $720.40M $792.27M
Total debt $31.94B $147.40M $6.02B
Shares (diluted) 1.48B 563.08M 186.51M
Enterprise value $22.44B $13.43B $4.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNKEASBIRK
P/E 17.9x 28.7x 15.5x
P/FCF 26.3x 22.7x 15.3x
P/Operating cash flow 19.9x 16.4x 12.8x
P/S 1.2x 2.1x 2.3x
P/B 3.6x 2.3x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 3.7x 3.8x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 12.2x 10.9x 7.9x
EV/EBIT 14.6x 15.9x 11.1x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 2.0x 2.7x
EV/FCF 26.1x 21.9x 18.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.8x 15.8x 15.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.28 – 0.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNKEASBIRK
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.2% 30.5% 19.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.8% – 20.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.5% 37.3% 14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -4.1% – 17.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.9% 52.3% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.6% – 23.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 6.8% 142.9% 16.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -15.1% – 31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.5% 117.4% 17.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.0% – 31.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -21.1% 106.4% 11.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% 170.6% -9.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNKEASBIRK
Gross margin 43.1% 59.8% 56.9%
EBITDA margin 9.8% 18.8% 34.2%
Operating margin 8.2% 12.9% 24.2%
Pretax margin 8.5% 10.8% 20.0%
Net margin 6.7% 7.3% 14.8%
FCF margin 4.6% 9.3% 14.8%
Operating cash flow margin 6.1% 12.9% 17.7%
Return on equity 20.6% 8.3% 12.0%
Return on assets 8.1% 5.6% 6.3%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 9.7% 9.7%
Return on capital employed 14.1% 11.7% 11.4%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.7x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNKEASBIRK
Debt / assets 20.9% 1.4% 30.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.0x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -0.4x 1.3x
Debt / FCF 3.7x 0.2x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 59.7% 32.9% 50.5%
Equity / assets 40.3% 67.1% 49.5%
Interest coverage – 10.6x 5.7x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.8x 3.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.7x 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.4x 1.4x
Altman Z-score 3.40 4.02 2.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNKEASBIRK
Dividend yield 4.4% – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% -5.5% –
Shareholder yield 4.0% -5.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 78.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 115.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNKEASBIRK
Forward P/E 30.6xFY2026 22.8xFY2026 14.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.22FY2026 $1.24FY2026 $2.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -41.9%FY2026 +27.8%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.0% +40.3% +25.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.49BFY2026 $7.73BFY2026 $2.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -12.7%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.8% +16.5% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNKEASBIRK
Held by institutions 80.0% 38.1% 90.6%
Institutions holding 1,734 354 233
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +4.1% -2.7%
Institutions buying 797 236 123
Institutions selling 754 87 85
Buyers to sellers 1.06 2.71 1.45

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NKEASBIRK
NKE 1.00 0.30 0.31
AS 0.30 1.00 0.44
BIRK 0.31 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NKE, AS and BIRK?

Nike (NKE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nike (NKE) $56.24B, Amer Sports (AS) $15.84B, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) $6.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, NKE, AS and BIRK?

Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nike (NKE) 18.2x, Amer Sports (AS) 29.0x, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 15.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) is cheapest (Nike (NKE) 30.6x, Amer Sports (AS) 22.8x, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 14.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amer Sports (AS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nike (NKE) -1.2%, Amer Sports (AS) +30.5%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) +19.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) has the highest net margin (Nike (NKE) 6.7%, Amer Sports (AS) 7.3%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 14.8%). On return on invested capital, Nike (NKE) leads (Nike (NKE) 13.0%, Amer Sports (AS) 9.7%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amer Sports (AS) returned the most: Nike (NKE) -46.4%, Amer Sports (AS) -10.7%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) -24.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nike (NKE) 0.04%, Amer Sports (AS) 0.00%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 0.00%. Amer Sports (AS) and Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nike (NKE) has been the steadiest (Nike (NKE) 36.6%, Amer Sports (AS) 39.8%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 52.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NKE, AS and BIRK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.