NEOG vs PHG vs HTFL Stock Comparison

Neogen, Koninklijke Philips and Heartflow Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NEOG Neogen Corp
$12.26 -3.7% 1M +96.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.68B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$883.99M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$27.13 +9.5% 1M -1.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.12B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
3.65%
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
8 wins
HTFL Heartflow, Inc.
$60.53 +21.5% 1M +61.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.25B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$202.91M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 8, Heartflow 1, Neogen 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNEOGPHGHTFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.68B $26.12B $5.25B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -47.7x 14.0x -52.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.3x 13.7x — PHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.3% +6.1% +42.5% HTFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6.3% 8.9% -49.4% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.2% 11.5% — PHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.4x 1.8x — PHG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.65% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +96.8% -1.7% +61.3% NEOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.0%/yr -10.5%/yr — PHG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.7% 28.3% 76.8% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 81/100 56/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

NEOGPHGHTFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNEOGPHGHTFL
Valuation 73 #62 of 227 98 #6 of 227 9 #207 of 227
Growth 49 #111 of 218 96 #9 of 218 74 #57 of 218
Profitability 63 #76 of 202 96 #10 of 202 49 #103 of 202
Financial Health 47 #125 of 233 33 #156 of 233 91 #22 of 233
Shareholder Returns 55 #59 of 130 81 #26 of 130 –
Overall 57 81 56
  • NEOG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PHG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • HTFL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNEOGPHGHTFLSPY
1 month -3.7%+9.5%+21.5% +0.7%
3 months +6.3%+2.6%+134.3% +3.7%
6 months +30.4%+3.0%+103.4% +7.1%
Year to date +75.4%+0.2%+107.7% +12.8%
1 year +96.8%-1.7%+61.3% +11.9%
3 years -18.6%+45.8%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -6.6%+13.4%— +22.8%
5 years -71.0%-42.6%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -22.0%-10.5%— +10.9%
10 years -37.3%-10.1%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -4.6%-1.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNEOGPHGHTFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.7%28.3%76.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.7%27.7%78.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.440.821.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.74-0.060.80 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.6%-75.6%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.3%-17.6%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $13.98$32.91$60.53 $779.14
52-week low $5.41$23.81$20.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNEOGPHGHTFL
P/E now vs peer median -47.7xmedian 28.7x 14.0xmedian 28.7x -52.2xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.0x 1.3xmedian 3.0x 25.9xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 17.8x 8.2xmedian 17.8x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.7xmedian 26.4x 6.0xmedian 26.4x —median 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.4x 2.0xmedian 2.4x 18.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.70median 0.99 0.33median 0.99 —median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNEOGPHGHTFL
Revenue $883.99M $20.60B $202.91M
Gross profit $418.98M $16.03B $160.45M
Operating income -$7.38M $2.65B -$64.46M
Net income -$56.10M $1.39B -$100.19M
Free cash flow $49.80M $4.34B –
R&D $19.76M $2.00B $77.26M
EPS (diluted) $-0.26 $1.91 $-1.16
Cash & equivalents $172.00M $2.04B $34.36M
Total debt $774.20M $9.51B –
Shares (diluted) 218.10M 962.50M 86.40M
Enterprise value $2.01B $15.27B $5.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNEOGPHGHTFL
P/E -47.7x 14.0x -52.2x
P/FCF 53.7x 6.0x –
P/Operating cash flow 31.4x 9.8x –
P/S 3.0x 1.3x 25.9x
P/B 1.3x 2.0x 18.8x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 2.6x 18.8x
EV/EBITDA 29.6x 8.2x –
EV/EBIT -444.4x 12.6x -77.6x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 1.6x 24.7x
EV/FCF 65.8x 7.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 38.4x 12.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.70 0.33 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNEOGPHGHTFL
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.3% 6.1% 42.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.3% 2.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.8% 82.4% 48.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.1% 6.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 99.3% 121.3% -9.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.0% 52.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 94.6% 293.5% -18.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.3% 35.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 94.6% 539.4% 91.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.0% 42.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.9% 116.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 53.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1,631% 54.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 126.1% 45.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNEOGPHGHTFL
Gross margin 47.4% 77.8% 79.1%
EBITDA margin 12.5% 19.8% –
Operating margin -0.8% 12.9% -31.8%
Pretax margin -7.7% 11.9% -49.4%
Net margin -6.3% 8.9% -49.4%
FCF margin 5.6% 21.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 12.9% –
Return on equity -2.7% 12.7% -34.5%
Return on assets -1.7% 5.4% -28.5%
Return on invested capital -0.2% 11.5% –
Return on capital employed -0.2% 11.8% -20.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.7% 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNEOGPHGHTFL
Debt / assets 23.4% 31.2% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.4x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 15.5x 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 36.8% 57.1% 18.8%
Equity / assets 63.2% 42.9% 81.2%
Interest coverage – 6.2x –
Current ratio 3.9x 1.3x 5.1x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.7x 6.6x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.2x 5.6x
Altman Z-score 1.50 – 44.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNEOGPHGHTFL
Dividend yield – 3.6% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -0.5% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% 3.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNEOGPHGHTFL
Forward P/E 38.3xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.32FY2026 $1.98FY2026 $-0.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +31.3% -10.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $847.28MFY2026 $21.63BFY2026 $261.38MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.7%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +48.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.5% -8.2% +20.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNEOGPHGHTFL
Held by institutions 100.0% 5.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 315 364 193
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +0.8% +133.0%
Institutions buying 151 267 140
Institutions selling 106 76 38
Buyers to sellers 1.42 3.51 3.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NEOGPHGHTFL
NEOG 1.00 0.30 0.14
PHG 0.30 1.00 0.14
HTFL 0.14 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NEOG, PHG and HTFL?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Neogen (NEOG) $2.68B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $26.12B, Heartflow (HTFL) $5.25B.

Which company is growing faster?

Heartflow (HTFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Neogen (NEOG) -0.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%, Heartflow (HTFL) +42.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Neogen (NEOG) -6.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%, Heartflow (HTFL) -49.4%). On return on invested capital, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads (Neogen (NEOG) -0.2%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neogen (NEOG) returned the most: Neogen (NEOG) +96.8%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -1.7%, Heartflow (HTFL) +61.3%. Over five years, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) compounded fastest (Neogen (NEOG) -22.0%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 3.65%. Neogen (NEOG) and Heartflow (HTFL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Neogen (NEOG) 55.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.3%, Heartflow (HTFL) 76.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NEOG, PHG and HTFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.