NBIS vs QCOM vs WRD Stock Comparison

Nebius, Qualcomm and WeRide Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.
$170.47 -28.2% 1M +35.9% 1Y
Market cap
$41.78B
P/E
46.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.36B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
3 wins
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$184.17 -8.8% 1M -1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$191.77B
P/E
20.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.37 -21.0% 1M -60.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.39B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 5, Nebius 3, WeRide 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNBISQCOMWRDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $41.78B $191.77B $1.39B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 46.6x 20.7x -6.2x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +506.9% +1.9% +244.8% NBIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 66.1% 21.0% -243.6% NBIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.3% 20.5% -24.9% QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 0.4x — QCOM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +35.9% -1.9% -60.8% NBIS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +6.6%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 107.3% 53.0% 60.3% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 61/100 66/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

NBISQCOMWRD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNBISQCOMWRD
Valuation 78 #9 of 38 80 #20 of 94 42 #8 of 13
Growth 34 #24 of 36 33 #62 of 92 91 #2 of 12
Profitability 76 #9 of 34 85 #14 of 90 82 #3 of 12
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 28 #72 of 99 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns – 79 #16 of 73 –
Overall 66 61 66
  • NBIS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNBISQCOMWRDSPY
1 month -28.2%-8.8%-21.0% -0.2%
3 months +0.5%+13.1%-24.8% +3.9%
6 months +25.8%+22.8%-44.1% +8.2%
Year to date +103.6%+7.7%-49.7% +12.9%
1 year +35.9%-1.9%-60.8% +12.3%
3 years —+73.0%— +87.4%
3 years, per year —+20.1%— +23.3%
5 years —+37.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —+6.6%— +10.9%
10 years —+162.8%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+10.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNBISQCOMWRDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 107.3%53.0%60.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.4%52.5%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.812.072.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.33-0.04-1.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.3%-45.6%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.5%-26.6%-62.7% -1.2%
52-week high $286.69$251.02$11.72 $779.14
52-week low $73.87$124.07$4.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNBISQCOMWRD
P/E now vs peer median 46.2xmedian 29.5x 21.0xmedian 45.6x -6.0x
P/S now vs peer median 31.8xmedian 4.5x 4.4xmedian 7.7x 14.6xmedian 18.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 257.3xmedian 23.9x 16.9xmedian 29.0x —
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 15.0x 18.7xmedian 40.6x —median 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 4.3x 7.0xmedian 4.6x 1.4xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.65median 0.38 5.05median 2.28 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNBISQCOMWRD
Revenue $1.36B $44.07B $92.10M
Gross profit $1.01B $23.90B $39.20M
Operating income -$668.60M $10.22B -$260.29M
Net income $61.60M $9.26B -$237.93M
Free cash flow $16.40B $10.42B –
R&D $356.40M $9.89B $219.70M
EPS (diluted) $3.17 $8.66 –
Cash & equivalents $8.04B $4.53B $629.27M
Total debt $25.23B $12.78B $194.84M
Shares (diluted) 282.72M 1.07B –
Enterprise value $15.22B $151.69B -$1.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNBISQCOMWRD
P/E 46.2x 21.0x -6.0x
P/FCF 2.6x 18.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x 15.7x –
P/S 31.8x 4.4x 14.6x
P/B 4.2x 7.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 4.2x 7.4x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 257.3x 16.9x –
EV/EBIT -65.3x 19.5x -2.9x
EV/Revenue 32.2x 4.5x 8.2x
EV/FCF 2.7x 19.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.3x 16.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.65 5.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNBISQCOMWRD
Revenue growth (1Y) 506.9% 1.9% 244.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -83.4% 4.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 631.9% -0.8% 142.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -81.7% 3.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -49.0% -15.0% -22.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.7% 0.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -73.4% -20.0% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -90.6% 2.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 318.1% -17.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -70.8% 4.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1,193% -2.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -55.8% 12.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1,310% -10.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -47.1% 14.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNBISQCOMWRD
Gross margin 74.3% 54.2% 42.6%
EBITDA margin 12.5% 26.8% –
Operating margin -49.3% 23.2% -282.6%
Pretax margin 5.3% 25.4% -258.0%
Net margin 66.1% 21.0% -243.6%
FCF margin 1,210% 23.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 388.0% 28.1% –
Return on equity 0.7% 33.7% -24.1%
Return on assets 0.2% 16.2% -20.5%
Return on invested capital -3.3% 20.5% -24.9%
Return on capital employed -2.9% 22.3% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 85.4x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 13.9% 7.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNBISQCOMWRD
Debt / assets 30.6% 22.3% 6.3%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.5x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 0.5x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 63.0% 51.8% 17.5%
Equity / assets 37.0% 48.2% 82.5%
Interest coverage -2.8x 14.8x –
Current ratio 4.0x 2.0x 5.4x
Quick ratio 3.5x 1.1x 4.0x
Cash ratio 3.4x 0.7x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 1.94 6.20 2.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNBISQCOMWRD
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield 6,593% 4.5% –
Shareholder yield 6,593% 6.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNBISQCOMWRD
Forward P/E – 17.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.82FY2026 $10.79FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -10.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -3.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.25BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026 $149.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +514.3%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +52.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +246.0% -5.0% +88.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNBISQCOMWRD
Held by institutions – 79.7% 26.0%
Institutions holding – 3,030 110
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.8% -1.2%
Institutions buying – 1,416 51
Institutions selling – 1,333 35
Buyers to sellers – 1.06 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NBISQCOMWRD
NBIS 1.00 0.19 0.29
QCOM 0.19 1.00 0.26
WRD 0.29 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NBIS, QCOM and WRD?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nebius (NBIS) $41.78B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $191.77B, WeRide (WRD) $1.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, NBIS, QCOM and WRD?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nebius (NBIS) 46.6x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.7x, WeRide (WRD) -6.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nebius (NBIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nebius (NBIS) +506.9%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, WeRide (WRD) +244.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nebius (NBIS) has the highest net margin (Nebius (NBIS) 66.1%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, WeRide (WRD) -243.6%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (Nebius (NBIS) -3.3%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%, WeRide (WRD) -24.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nebius (NBIS) returned the most: Nebius (NBIS) +35.9%, Qualcomm (QCOM) -1.9%, WeRide (WRD) -60.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nebius (NBIS) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%, WeRide (WRD) 0.00%. Nebius (NBIS) and WeRide (WRD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (Nebius (NBIS) 107.3%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.0%, WeRide (WRD) 60.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NBIS, QCOM and WRD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.