MYRG vs PWR vs ECG Stock Comparison

Myr, Quanta Services and Everus Construction Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MYRG Myr Group Inc.
$283.00 -1.8% 1M +25.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
22.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.31B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$635.18 -2.6% 1M +41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$93.63B
P/E
55.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.29B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Everus Construction leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Everus Construction 6, Quanta Services 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMYRGPWRECGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.42B $93.63B $5.26B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.9x 55.7x 20.7x ECG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x 40.0x 20.9x ECG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.8% +37.1% +30.5% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.5% — 6.0% ECG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.8% — 23.9% ECG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x — 0.3x ECG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.5% +41.6% +17.6% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.6%/yr +39.3%/yr — PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.6% 45.2% 62.3% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 46/100 80/100 ECG

Percentile Scorecard

MYRGPWRECG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMYRGPWRECG
Valuation 65 #19 of 52 20 #42 of 52 69 #17 of 52
Growth 72 #11 of 37 78 #9 of 37 81 #8 of 37
Profitability 83 #7 of 37 72 #11 of 37 89 #5 of 37
Financial Health 75 #15 of 57 41 #34 of 57 82 #11 of 57
Shareholder Returns 31 #19 of 27 19 #22 of 27 –
Overall 65 46 80
  • MYRG ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • ECG ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMYRGPWRECGSPY
1 month -1.8%-2.6%-8.3% +0.7%
3 months -14.5%-3.5%-12.1% +3.7%
6 months -30.1%-12.7%-26.7% +7.1%
Year to date +29.5%+50.5%+26.3% +12.8%
1 year +25.5%+41.6%+17.6% +11.9%
3 years +149.6%+285.5%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +35.7%+56.8%— +22.8%
5 years +177.0%+423.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +22.6%+39.3%— +10.9%
10 years +860.6%+2,124.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +25.4%+36.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMYRGPWRECGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.6%45.2%62.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.2%42.8%62.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.881.722.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.510.920.28 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-33.9%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.5%-19.1%-36.1% -1.2%
52-week high $501.13$785.24$169.16 $779.14
52-week low $203.61$413.17$80.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMYRGPWRECG
P/E now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 28.1x 56.7xmedian 28.1x 21.7xmedian 28.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.8x 2.6xmedian 0.8x 1.3xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x 15.3xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.1xmedian 25.0x 42.8xmedian 25.0x 22.0xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.5x 9.0xmedian 2.5x 7.1xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 0.60 1.71median 0.60 —median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMYRGPWRECG
Revenue $4.31B $37.29B $4.27B
Gross profit $559.64M $5.88B $555.38M
Operating income $264.30M $2.55B $330.71M
Net income $193.20M – $254.46M
Free cash flow $137.11M – $250.37M
EPS (diluted) $12.29 $11.04 $4.97
Cash & equivalents $26.01M $2.32B $176.70M
Total debt $215.77M – $274.50M
Shares (diluted) 15.72M 152.44M 51.22M
Enterprise value $3.94B $93.63B $4.47B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMYRGPWRECG
P/E 22.8x 56.7x 21.7x
P/FCF 32.1x 42.8x 22.0x
P/Operating cash flow 17.7x – 17.2x
P/S 1.0x 2.6x 1.3x
P/B 5.4x 9.0x 7.1x
P/Tangible book 7.5x 12.8x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA 13.5x – 15.3x
EV/EBIT 17.4x – 17.0x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.6x 1.3x
EV/FCF 33.5x – 22.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.5x – 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 1.71 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMYRGPWRECG
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.8% 37.1% 30.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 24.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 40.5% 42.6% 42.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 27.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 75.6% 61.2% 48.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.1% 33.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 97.5% – 53.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.3% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 96.4% 64.2% 53.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 33.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.9% – 67.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.2% – 94.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMYRGPWRECG
Gross margin 13.0% – 13.0%
EBITDA margin 7.9% – 8.6%
Operating margin 6.1% – 7.8%
Pretax margin 6.0% – 7.7%
Net margin 4.5% – 6.0%
FCF margin 3.2% – 5.9%
Operating cash flow margin 5.8% – 7.5%
Return on equity 24.6% 16.8% 32.6%
Return on assets 10.2% 5.6% 12.2%
Return on invested capital 21.8% – 23.9%
Return on capital employed 26.4% – 32.3%
Asset turnover 2.3x 1.2x 2.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMYRGPWRECG
Debt / assets 10.2% – 13.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x – 0.3x
Debt / FCF 1.6x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 61.1% 67.6% 62.4%
Equity / assets 38.9% 32.4% 37.6%
Interest coverage 45.3x – 16.8x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.3x – 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 5.12 – 5.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMYRGPWRECG
Dividend yield – 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMYRGPWRECG
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 40.0xFY2026 20.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.96FY2026 $15.88FY2026 $5.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +72.1%FY2026 +47.7%FY2026 +30.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.2% +27.0% +8.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.29BFY2026 $40.73BFY2026 $4.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026 +21.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.3% +9.6% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMYRGPWRECG
Held by institutions 99.3% 88.9% 84.9%
Institutions holding 464 1,921 538
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +13.5% +2.3%
Institutions buying 256 972 263
Institutions selling 170 705 162
Buyers to sellers 1.51 1.38 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MYRGPWRECG
MYRG 1.00 0.77 0.68
PWR 0.77 1.00 0.72
ECG 0.68 0.72 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MYRG, PWR and ECG?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Myr (MYRG) $4.42B, Quanta Services (PWR) $93.63B, Everus Construction (ECG) $5.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, MYRG, PWR and ECG?

Everus Construction (ECG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Myr (MYRG) 22.9x, Quanta Services (PWR) 55.7x, Everus Construction (ECG) 20.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Everus Construction (ECG) is cheapest (Myr (MYRG) 21.8x, Quanta Services (PWR) 40.0x, Everus Construction (ECG) 20.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Myr (MYRG) +22.8%, Quanta Services (PWR) +37.1%, Everus Construction (ECG) +30.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Everus Construction (ECG) has the highest net margin (Myr (MYRG) 4.5%, Everus Construction (ECG) 6.0%). On return on invested capital, Everus Construction (ECG) leads (Myr (MYRG) 21.8%, Everus Construction (ECG) 23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Myr (MYRG) +25.5%, Quanta Services (PWR) +41.6%, Everus Construction (ECG) +17.6%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (Myr (MYRG) +22.6%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +39.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Myr (MYRG) 49.6%, Quanta Services (PWR) 45.2%, Everus Construction (ECG) 62.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MYRG, PWR and ECG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Everus Construction (ECG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.