MWYN vs NOMD vs PFGC Stock Comparison

Marwynn Holdings, Nomad Foods and Performance Food Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MWYN Marwynn Holdings, Inc.
$1.76 +77.8% 1M +83.3% 1Y
Market cap
$37.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29M
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
3 wins
NOMD Nomad Foods Ltd
$11.91 +13.3% 1M +4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.79B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.46B
Div. yield
0.05%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
4 wins
PFGC Performance Food Group Co
$97.51 +6.0% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$15.34B
P/E
42.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$67.84B
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Performance Food leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Performance Food 4, Nomad Foods 4, Marwynn Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMWYNNOMDPFGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.97M $1.79B $15.34B PFGC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -29.0x 12.3x 42.7x NOMD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.2x 16.8x NOMD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +603.3% +3.6% +7.2% MWYN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -24.7% 4.2% 0.5% NOMD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.2% 6.6% PFGC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.8x 2.9x MWYN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +83.3% +4.2% -0.9% MWYN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.3%/yr +16.6%/yr PFGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 124.9% 32.4% 29.1% PFGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 63/100 42/100 NOMD

Percentile Scorecard

MWYNNOMDPFGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMWYNNOMDPFGC
Valuation 0 #40 of 40 91 #5 of 45 56 #18 of 40
Growth 100 #1 of 38 39 #26 of 42 62 #15 of 38
Profitability 0 #36 of 36 67 #14 of 40 43 #21 of 36
Financial Health 87 #6 of 40 50 #24 of 47 44 #23 of 40
Shareholder Returns – 70 #10 of 31 4 #27 of 28
Overall 47 63 42
  • MWYN ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • NOMD ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • PFGC ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMWYNNOMDPFGCSPY
1 month +77.8%+13.3%+6.0% +0.7%
3 months +141.1%-4.0%-15.0% +3.7%
6 months +203.4%+22.5%+7.7% +7.1%
Year to date +109.5%-4.8%+8.4% +12.8%
1 year +83.3%+4.2%-0.9% +11.9%
3 years —-13.6%+75.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year —-4.8%+20.7% +22.8%
5 years —-56.3%+115.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-15.3%+16.6% +10.9%
10 years —-3.2%+308.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-0.3%+15.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMWYNNOMDPFGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 124.9%32.4%29.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.3%31.4%29.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.57-0.030.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.670.13-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.2%-67.4%-32.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.8%-8.7%-16.5% -1.2%
52-week high $2.70$13.04$116.71 $779.14
52-week low $0.49$9.09$81.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMWYNNOMDPFGC
P/E now vs peer median -27.2xmedian 22.1x 12.3xmedian 18.4x 42.3xmedian 22.1x
P/S now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 0.5x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -53.5xmedian 9.5x 8.2xmedian 12.0x 11.7xmedian 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -18.0xmedian 16.0x 5.8xmedian 13.6x 14.8xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 2.8x 0.6xmedian 1.6x 3.1xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 -1.16median 0.55 -12.18median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMWYNNOMDPFGC
Revenue $5.29M $3.46B $67.84B
Gross profit $844.44K $930.71M $8.09B
Operating income -$730.77K $360.86M $887.50M
Net income -$1.31M $145.09M $359.30M
Free cash flow -$1.98M $292.81M $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $-0.06 $0.89 $2.29
Cash & equivalents $3.54K $312.28M $92.40M
Total debt $736.48K $10.21B $5.01B
Shares (diluted) 20.19M 162.22M 157.00M
Enterprise value $36.15M $543.66M $15.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMWYNNOMDPFGC
P/E -27.2x 12.3x 42.3x
P/FCF -18.0x 5.8x 14.8x
P/Operating cash flow -18.0x 4.4x 10.8x
P/S 6.7x 0.5x 0.2x
P/B 14.2x 0.6x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 14.9x 26.4x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA -53.5x 8.2x 11.7x
EV/EBIT -49.0x 11.2x 22.7x
EV/Revenue 6.8x 1.2x 0.3x
EV/FCF -18.1x 13.7x 19.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -18.1x 10.5x 14.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.16 -12.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMWYNNOMDPFGC
Revenue growth (1Y) 603.3% 3.6% 7.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 126.3% -4.1% 9.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 88.7% -11.7% 8.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -0.5% 5.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 80.7% -37.2% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -12.7% -3.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 83.7% -37.2% 5.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -10.6% -3.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 64.4% -20.0% 16.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.8% 19.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 64.1% -26.3% 46.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% 22.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMWYNNOMDPFGC
Gross margin 16.0% 26.9% 11.9%
EBITDA margin -12.7% 14.1% 2.5%
Operating margin -13.8% 10.4% 1.3%
Pretax margin -12.4% 4.4% 0.7%
Net margin -24.7% 4.2% 0.5%
FCF margin -37.4% 8.5% 1.5%
Operating cash flow margin -37.4% 11.1% 2.1%
Return on equity -51.5% 5.1% 7.5%
Return on assets -42.8% 2.0% 1.9%
Return on invested capital – 6.2% 6.6%
Return on capital employed -29.8% 6.0% 6.6%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.5x 3.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 2.7x 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 0.0% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMWYNNOMDPFGC
Debt / assets 9.7% 36.2% 26.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.9x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.8x 2.9x
Debt / FCF -0.2x 9.0x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 19.5% 60.5% 74.0%
Equity / assets 80.5% 39.5% 26.0%
Interest coverage – 1.6x 2.1x
Current ratio 4.9x 1.1x 1.5x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 33.49 1.17 4.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMWYNNOMDPFGC
Dividend yield – 5.7% –
Net buyback yield – 8.2% -0.3%
Shareholder yield – 13.9% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 67.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -2.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMWYNNOMDPFGC
Forward P/E – 7.2xFY2026 16.8xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.65FY2026 $5.82FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – -15.4%FY2026 +27.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – -4.2% +19.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.24BFY2026 $75.58BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – -9.0%FY2026 +11.4%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.5% +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMWYNNOMDPFGC
Held by institutions – 57.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 188 530
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.1% -0.9%
Institutions buying – 99 304
Institutions selling – 70 152
Buyers to sellers – 1.41 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MWYNNOMDPFGC
MWYN 1.00 0.02 0.00
NOMD 0.02 1.00 0.21
PFGC 0.00 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MWYN, NOMD and PFGC?

Performance Food (PFGC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) $37.97M, Nomad Foods (NOMD) $1.79B, Performance Food (PFGC) $15.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, MWYN, NOMD and PFGC?

Nomad Foods (NOMD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) -29.0x, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 12.3x, Performance Food (PFGC) 42.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nomad Foods (NOMD) is cheapest (Nomad Foods (NOMD) 7.2x, Performance Food (PFGC) 16.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) +603.3%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) +3.6%, Performance Food (PFGC) +7.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nomad Foods (NOMD) has the highest net margin (Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) -24.7%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 4.2%, Performance Food (PFGC) 0.5%). On return on invested capital, Performance Food (PFGC) leads (Nomad Foods (NOMD) 6.2%, Performance Food (PFGC) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) returned the most: Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) +83.3%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) +4.2%, Performance Food (PFGC) -0.9%. Over five years, Performance Food (PFGC) compounded fastest (Nomad Foods (NOMD) -15.3%/yr, Performance Food (PFGC) +16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) 0.00%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 0.05%, Performance Food (PFGC) 0.00%. Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) and Performance Food (PFGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Performance Food (PFGC) has been the steadiest (Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) 124.9%, Nomad Foods (NOMD) 32.4%, Performance Food (PFGC) 29.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MWYN, NOMD and PFGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Performance Food (PFGC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.