MVNC vs CHRW vs RXO Stock Comparison

Marvion, C. H. Robinson Worldwide and Rxo Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MVNC Marvion Inc.
$0.18 +1,700.0% 1M +500.0% 1Y
Market cap
$65.31M
P/E
175.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.47M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
RXO RXO, Inc.
$27.62 +37.0% 1M +58.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.68B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.09B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

C. H. Robinson Worldwide leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (C. H. Robinson Worldwide 5, Marvion 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMVNCCHRWRXOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $65.31M $14.99B $4.68B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 175.1x 22.4x -44.5x CHRW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.8x 212.5x CHRW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +124.8% +10.4% +9.5% MVNC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.9% — -1.7% MVNC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -3.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.7x — 16.0x MVNC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +500.0% -0.4% +58.4% MVNC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -62.5%/yr +5.6%/yr — CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 495.4% 48.4% 75.8% CHRW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 34/100 23/100 MVNC

Percentile Scorecard

MVNCCHRWRXO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMVNCCHRWRXO
Valuation 4 #131 of 136 26 #101 of 136 14 #117 of 136
Growth 86 #18 of 122 53 #58 of 122 17 #101 of 122
Profitability 37 #74 of 116 37 #73 of 116 19 #94 of 116
Financial Health 28 #104 of 143 21 #113 of 143 43 #82 of 143
Shareholder Returns – 34 #54 of 81 –
Overall 38 34 23
  • MVNC ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMVNCCHRWRXOSPY
1 month +1,700.0%-13.9%+37.0% +0.9%
3 months +1,700.0%-26.6%+23.7% +5.9%
6 months +1,700.0%-31.6%+44.8% +8.5%
Year to date +800.0%-20.6%+118.5% +13.3%
1 year +500.0%-0.4%+58.4% +12.4%
3 years -90.0%+57.0%+59.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year -53.6%+16.2%+17.0% +23.5%
5 years -99.3%+31.6%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -62.5%+5.6%— +11.0%
10 years -70.0%+88.8%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -11.3%+6.6%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMVNCCHRWRXOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 495.4%48.4%75.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 985.4%53.3%83.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.090.551.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.01-0.010.77 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-43.2%-67.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.0%-39.1%-5.8% -0.9%
52-week high $0.30$209.42$29.32 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$127.60$10.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMVNCCHRWRXO
P/E now vs peer median 175.1xmedian 16.1x 22.6xmedian 16.1x -44.6xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 18.8xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.7xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 146.9xmedian 8.6x —median 8.6x 167.8xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -143.1xmedian 11.6x 26.2xmedian 11.6x -59.9xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median -16.6xmedian 1.2x 9.5xmedian 1.2x 3.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.85median 0.80 1.15median 0.80 0.44median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMVNCCHRWRXO
Revenue $3.47M $18.22B $6.09B
Gross profit $1.53M – $1.11B
Operating income $208.39K $884.59M -$76.00M
Net income $345.08K $668.81M -$105.00M
Free cash flow -$456.31K – -$76.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $5.58 $-0.62
Cash & equivalents $762.32K $193.13M $15.00M
Total debt $10.50M – $495.00M
Shares (diluted) 335.59M 119.75M 169.65M
Enterprise value $63.52M $14.99B $4.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMVNCCHRWRXO
P/E 175.1x 22.6x -44.6x
P/FCF -143.1x 26.2x -59.9x
P/Operating cash flow 148.0x 28.0x -267.9x
P/S 18.8x 0.8x 0.7x
P/B -16.6x 9.5x 3.0x
P/Tangible book -16.6x 9.5x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA 146.9x – 167.8x
EV/EBIT 309.8x – -66.3x
EV/Revenue 18.6x 0.8x 0.8x
EV/FCF -141.5x – -66.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 146.3x 28.0x -296.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.85 1.15 0.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMVNCCHRWRXO
Revenue growth (1Y) 124.8% 10.4% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -32.9% -0.4% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 100.3% – -1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -18.1% – 1.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 133.9% 10.9% -2.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 15.7% -62.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 147.0% 11.5% 65.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 19.7% -120.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 127.2% 12.9% 66.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.9% 19.7% -101.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 345.8% -39.1% -342.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.4% -28.5% -27.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 32.9% – -68.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – -36.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMVNCCHRWRXO
Gross margin 44.1% – 18.2%
EBITDA margin 12.7% – 0.5%
Operating margin 6.0% – -1.2%
Pretax margin 9.8% – -2.0%
Net margin 9.9% – -1.7%
FCF margin -13.1% – -1.2%
Operating cash flow margin 12.7% 2.9% -0.3%
Return on equity – – -7.0%
Return on assets 6.4% – -3.1%
Return on invested capital – – -3.3%
Return on capital employed – – -3.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 3.0x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.8x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMVNCCHRWRXO
Debt / assets 0.0% – 14.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.7x – 16.0x
Debt / FCF 0.0x – -6.5x
Liabilities / assets 167.3% 75.3% 56.5%
Equity / assets -67.3% 24.7% 43.5%
Interest coverage 1.0x – –
Current ratio 0.2x 1.3x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.2x – 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.49 – 3.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMVNCCHRWRXO
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 2.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMVNCCHRWRXO
Forward P/E – 20.8xFY2026 212.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.12FY2026 $0.13FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +20.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +19.0% +384.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $18.98BFY2026 $7.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +16.9%FY2026 +25.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.5% -0.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMVNCCHRWRXO
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 891 303
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.7% -1.3%
Institutions buying – 445 165
Institutions selling – 318 82
Buyers to sellers – 1.40 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MVNCCHRWRXO
MVNC 1.00 -0.02 -0.02
CHRW -0.02 1.00 0.47
RXO -0.02 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MVNC, CHRW and RXO?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marvion (MVNC) $65.31M, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.99B, Rxo (RXO) $4.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, MVNC, CHRW and RXO?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marvion (MVNC) 175.1x, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 22.4x, Rxo (RXO) -44.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 20.8x, Rxo (RXO) 212.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marvion (MVNC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marvion (MVNC) +124.8%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Rxo (RXO) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marvion (MVNC) has the highest net margin (Marvion (MVNC) 9.9%, Rxo (RXO) -1.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvion (MVNC) returned the most: Marvion (MVNC) +500.0%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -0.4%, Rxo (RXO) +58.4%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (Marvion (MVNC) -62.5%/yr, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has been the steadiest (Marvion (MVNC) 495.4%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%, Rxo (RXO) 75.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MVNC, CHRW and RXO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.