MUFG vs TD vs WFC Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Toronto Dominion Bank and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TD Toronto Dominion Bank
$125.74 +4.3% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$212.44B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.75B
Div. yield
3.50%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.68 -0.3% 1M -5.0% 1Y
Market cap
$250.40B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.24%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 4, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3, Toronto Dominion Bank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGTDWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $255.04B $212.44B $250.40B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 19.3x 12.4x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x 18.4x 10.6x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% -3.6% +5.4% WFC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 24.1% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.44% 3.50% 2.24% TD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.2% +54.0% -5.0% TD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.0%/yr +11.6%/yr +10.0%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 18.2% 25.5% TD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 23/100 40/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGTDWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGTDWFC
Valuation 20 #287 of 360 13 #312 of 360 63 #135 of 360
Growth 82 #36 of 191 37 #121 of 191 22 #149 of 191
Profitability 61 #66 of 168 12 #148 of 168 –
Financial Health 6 #164 of 175 1 #173 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 16 #287 of 341 54 #159 of 341 35 #222 of 341
Overall 37 23 40
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TD ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGTDWFCSPY
1 month -8.5%+4.3%-0.3% -0.2%
3 months -4.2%+4.5%-4.9% +3.9%
6 months +22.5%+19.3%+1.4% +8.2%
Year to date +35.5%+33.5%-11.3% +12.9%
1 year +44.2%+54.0%-5.0% +12.3%
3 years +160.8%+129.0%+113.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.7%+31.8%+28.8% +23.3%
5 years +285.1%+73.0%+61.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +31.0%+11.6%+10.0% +10.9%
10 years +318.1%+177.1%+78.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.4%+10.7%+5.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMUFGTDWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%18.2%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%19.0%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.920.750.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.682.96-0.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-39.3%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%0.0%-14.2% -1.2%
52-week high $24.14$125.74$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$80.43$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGTDWFC
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.1x 19.3xmedian 12.1x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.4x 4.5xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 10.2xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 38.3xmedian 10.9x 12.7xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.34 4.57median 1.34 1.10median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGTDWFC
Revenue $31.62B $46.75B $87.23B
Gross profit $29.85B – –
Operating income $18.02B $3.46B –
Net income $13.97B $11.69B –
Free cash flow – $5.55B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $6.52 $6.62
Cash & equivalents – $4.86B –
Total debt $494.43B – –
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 1.73B 3.07B
Enterprise value -$77.20B -$463.44B $252.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGTDWFC
P/E 16.2x 19.3x 12.4x
P/FCF – 38.3x 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 38.3x –
P/S 8.1x 4.5x 2.9x
P/B 2.4x 2.3x –
P/Tangible book 2.4x 2.4x –
EV/EBITDA – 10.2x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 15.0x –
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.1x 2.9x
EV/FCF – 9.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 9.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 4.57 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGTDWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% -3.6% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 5.7% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% 17.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% 47.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% -21.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 2.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% -20.7% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 4.2% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -64.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -64.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGTDWFC
Gross margin 94.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 10.9% –
Operating margin 57.0% 7.4% –
Pretax margin 59.6% -66.0% –
Net margin 47.7% 24.1% –
FCF margin – 11.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 11.9% –
Return on equity 11.7% 12.9% –
Return on assets 0.5% 0.8% –
Return on invested capital 3.6% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGTDWFC
Debt / assets 4.7% – –
Debt / equity 1.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 94.0% 92.1%
Equity / assets 4.0% 6.0% –
Interest coverage 0.6x 0.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGTDWFC
Dividend yield 1.4% 3.5% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 2.4% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 5.9% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 48.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 101.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 4.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGTDWFC
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 18.4xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $6.83FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +14.4%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +9.4% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $45.67BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +14.9%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +3.1% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGTDWFC
Held by institutions 3.0% 45.9% 76.8%
Institutions holding 574 900 2,877
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% -1.2% +1.1%
Institutions buying 324 385 1,292
Institutions selling 160 304 1,134
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.27 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGTDWFC
MUFG 1.00 0.49 0.31
TD 0.49 1.00 0.47
WFC 0.31 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, TD and WFC?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $255.04B, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) $212.44B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $250.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, TD and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 19.3x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.4x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) -3.6%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 24.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +54.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -5.0%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +11.6%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has the highest dividend yield: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 1.44%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 3.50%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.24%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, TD and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.