MUFG vs RY vs SLF Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Royal Bank Of Canada and Sun Life Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RY Royal Bank Of Canada
$203.12 +0.6% 1M +37.0% 1Y
Market cap
$287.13B
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$51.37B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc
$80.05 +0.2% 1M +28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$45.38B
P/E
19.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Life Insurance Financial Services

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Royal Bank Of Canada leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Royal Bank Of Canada 5, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGRYSLFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $243.55B $287.13B $45.38B RY
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x 17.5x 19.0x MUFG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x 16.6x 13.2x MUFG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +11.2% — RY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 31.9% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 49.3% 12.7% RY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -3.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.2% +37.0% +28.5% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.0%/yr +13.8%/yr +6.9%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 16.5% 18.6% RY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 77/100 34/100 RY

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGRYSLF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGRYSLF
Valuation 20 #287 of 360 63 #134 of 360 21 #94 of 119
Growth 82 #36 of 191 71 #57 of 191 27 #84 of 114
Profitability 61 #66 of 168 95 #9 of 168 43 #63 of 110
Financial Health 6 #164 of 175 64 #63 of 175 33 #74 of 110
Shareholder Returns 16 #287 of 341 89 #37 of 341 48 #56 of 106
Overall 37 77 34
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RY ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • SLF ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGRYSLFSPY
1 month -8.5%+0.6%+0.2% -0.2%
3 months -4.2%-4.4%-4.8% +3.9%
6 months +22.5%+14.3%+12.4% +8.2%
Year to date +35.5%+19.1%+28.3% +12.9%
1 year +44.2%+37.0%+28.5% +12.3%
3 years +160.8%+159.8%+78.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.7%+37.5%+21.4% +23.3%
5 years +285.1%+91.2%+39.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year +31.0%+13.8%+6.9% +10.9%
10 years +318.1%+224.7%+138.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.4%+12.5%+9.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMUFGRYSLFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%16.5%18.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%15.8%20.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.920.700.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.682.241.54 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-34.2%-33.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%-6.8%-4.8% -1.2%
52-week high $24.14$217.87$84.07 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$145.41$57.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGRYSLF
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.1x 17.4xmedian 12.1x 18.8xmedian 10.5x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.4x 5.5xmedian 3.4x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 0.9xmedian 5.0x —median 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 5.0xmedian 10.9x 13.5xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 2.7xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.34 1.21median 1.34 7.18median 0.53

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGRYSLF
Revenue $31.62B $51.37B –
Gross profit $29.85B – –
Operating income $18.02B – –
Net income $13.97B $16.43B $2.57B
Free cash flow – $57.35B $3.28B
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $11.62 $4.23
Cash & equivalents – $45.78B –
Total debt $494.43B $9.69B $6.42B
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 1.41B 566.00M
Enterprise value -$97.84B -$542.91B $3.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGRYSLF
P/E 16.2x 17.4x 18.8x
P/FCF – 5.0x 13.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 5.0x 13.1x
P/S 8.1x 5.5x –
P/B 2.4x 2.7x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 2.9x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA – 0.9x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 1.0x 9.9x
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.3x –
EV/FCF – 1.2x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 1.2x 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 1.21 7.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGRYSLF
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 11.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 10.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 19.6% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 14.8% 6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 19.0% 4.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 14.4% 2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -8.3% 8.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.0% 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -8.3% 8.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.0% 9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGRYSLF
Gross margin 94.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 140.4% –
Operating margin 57.0% – –
Pretax margin 59.6% 40.9% –
Net margin 47.7% 31.9% –
FCF margin – 111.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 111.6% –
Return on equity 11.7% 15.9% 13.9%
Return on assets 0.5% 0.9% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 3.6% 49.3% 12.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3.5x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGRYSLF
Debt / assets 4.7% 0.5% 2.1%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -3.0x –
Debt / FCF – 0.2x 2.0x
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 94.2% 93.7%
Equity / assets 4.0% 5.8% 6.3%
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.4x 5.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGRYSLF
Dividend yield 1.4% 3.3% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – 3.1% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.4% 6.5% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGRYSLF
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 16.6xFY2026 13.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $12.27FY2026 $6.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +19.2%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +6.9% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $53.04BFY2026 $6.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +0.5% +29.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGRYSLF
Held by institutions 3.0% 43.8% 44.7%
Institutions holding 574 984 490
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +1.9% +1.3%
Institutions buying 324 446 256
Institutions selling 160 325 130
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.37 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGRYSLF
MUFG 1.00 0.49 0.31
RY 0.49 1.00 0.42
SLF 0.31 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, RY and SLF?

Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $243.55B, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) $287.13B, Sun Life Financial (SLF) $45.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, RY and SLF?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.1x, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) 17.5x, Sun Life Financial (SLF) 19.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) 16.6x, Sun Life Financial (SLF) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) +11.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) 31.9%). On return on invested capital, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) 49.3%, Sun Life Financial (SLF) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) +37.0%, Sun Life Financial (SLF) +28.5%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) +13.8%/yr, Sun Life Financial (SLF) +6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) 16.5%, Sun Life Financial (SLF) 18.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, RY and SLF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.