MUFG vs PNC vs GS Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Pnc Financial Services and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$926.20 +1.1% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$269.93B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.94%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Pnc Financial Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Pnc Financial Services 5, Goldman Sachs 3, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGPNCGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $254.80B $91.08B $269.93B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 12.6x 13.0x PNC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x 11.7x 12.3x PNC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +13.2% +18.7% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 29.2% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 11.7% — PNC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.44% 3.24% 1.94% PNC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.3% +24.9% +16.9% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.3%/yr +1.6%/yr +17.5%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 21.3% 31.9% PNC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 37/100 47/100 GS

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGPNCGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGPNCGS
Valuation 20 #289 of 361 12 #318 of 361 16 #302 of 361
Growth 81 #33 of 172 36 #110 of 172 97 #6 of 172
Profitability 61 #59 of 149 57 #65 of 149 –
Financial Health 7 #147 of 158 19 #129 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 16 #283 of 338 62 #128 of 338 28 #243 of 338
Overall 37 37 47
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • PNC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGPNCGSSPY
1 month -8.1%+2.1%+1.1% +0.9%
3 months -2.2%-8.1%-5.6% +5.9%
6 months +23.1%+4.4%+2.3% +8.5%
Year to date +35.4%+9.4%+5.4% +13.3%
1 year +42.3%+24.9%+16.9% +12.4%
3 years +160.6%+105.2%+219.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +37.6%+27.1%+47.3% +23.5%
5 years +289.7%+8.2%+124.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +31.3%+1.6%+17.5% +11.0%
10 years +319.3%+140.1%+422.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.4%+9.2%+18.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMUFGPNCGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%21.3%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.5%22.3%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.920.531.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.611.170.53 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-51.6%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-11.2%-19.6% -0.9%
52-week high $24.14$256.97$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$179.04$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGPNCGS
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.1x 12.6xmedian 12.1x 13.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.4x 3.6xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.1x 8.7xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x 12.2xmedian 10.8x -6.4xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.32 1.78median 1.32 0.26median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGPNCGS
Revenue $31.62B $25.03B $69.70B
Gross profit $29.85B – –
Operating income $18.02B – –
Net income $13.97B $7.68B –
Free cash flow – $7.49B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $18.13 $69.89
Cash & equivalents – – $177.00B
Total debt $494.43B $85.72B –
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 403.00M 304.90M
Enterprise value -$77.44B $91.13B $269.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGPNCGS
P/E 16.2x 12.6x 13.0x
P/FCF – 12.2x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.2x –
P/S 8.1x 3.6x 3.9x
P/B 2.4x 1.4x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 1.5x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 8.7x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 8.8x –
EV/Revenue 3.1x 7.1x 3.9x
EV/FCF – 23.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 23.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 1.78 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGPNCGS
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 13.2% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 4.1% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 22.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 6.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 22.6% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 7.1% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 23.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -15.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 23.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -15.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGPNCGS
Gross margin 94.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 81.4% –
Operating margin 57.0% – –
Pretax margin 59.6% 37.5% –
Net margin 47.7% 29.2% –
FCF margin – 29.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 29.9% –
Return on equity 11.7% 12.0% –
Return on assets 0.5% 1.3% –
Return on invested capital 3.6% 11.7% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGPNCGS
Debt / assets 4.7% 13.9% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.2x –
Debt / FCF – 11.4x –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 89.6% 94.3%
Equity / assets 4.0% 10.4% 5.7%
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.9x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGPNCGS
Dividend yield 1.4% 3.2% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 2.3% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 5.5% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGPNCGS
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 11.7xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $19.52FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +6.8% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +17.8%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +7.0% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGPNCGS
Held by institutions 3.0% 82.8% 72.1%
Institutions holding 574 2,040 3,150
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +2.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 324 1,047 1,553
Institutions selling 160 666 1,124
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.57 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGPNCGS
MUFG 1.00 0.36 0.47
PNC 0.36 1.00 0.48
GS 0.47 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, PNC and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $254.80B, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) $91.08B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $269.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, PNC and GS?

Pnc Financial Services (PNC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 12.6x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 11.7x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) +13.2%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 29.2%). On return on invested capital, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 11.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +42.3%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) +24.9%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.9%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.3%/yr, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) +1.6%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pnc Financial Services (PNC) has the highest dividend yield: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 1.44%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 3.24%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.94%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) 21.3%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, PNC and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pnc Financial Services (PNC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.