MUFG vs NU vs UBS Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Nu Holdings and UBS Group AG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.
$12.40 -8.7% 1M -22.5% 1Y
Market cap
$59.93B
P/E
16.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.34B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UBS UBS Group AG
$46.78 -5.8% 1M +21.2% 1Y
Market cap
$156.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.18%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 7, Nu Holdings 3, UBS Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGNUUBSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $255.04B $59.93B $156.32B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 16.6x — MUFG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x — 12.2x UBS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +50.5% — NU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 18.7% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 18.1% — NU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.44% — 1.18% MUFG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.2% -22.5% +21.2% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.0%/yr — +20.8%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 46.1% 26.9% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 41/100 — NU

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGNUUBS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGNUUBS
Valuation 20 #287 of 360 10 #325 of 360 –
Growth 82 #36 of 191 78 #42 of 191 –
Profitability 61 #66 of 168 35 #109 of 168 –
Financial Health 6 #164 of 175 73 #48 of 175 23 #135 of 175
Shareholder Returns 16 #287 of 341 11 #304 of 341 11 #303 of 341
Overall 37 41 –
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • NU ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UBS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGNUUBSSPY
1 month -8.5%-8.7%-5.8% -0.2%
3 months -4.2%-15.5%-10.1% +3.9%
6 months +22.5%-14.5%+11.1% +8.2%
Year to date +35.5%-25.9%+1.0% +12.9%
1 year +44.2%-22.5%+21.2% +12.3%
3 years +160.8%+54.8%+100.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.7%+15.7%+26.1% +23.3%
5 years +285.1%—+157.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +31.0%—+20.8% +10.9%
10 years +318.1%—+234.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.4%—+12.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMUFGNUUBSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%46.1%26.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%51.1%28.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.921.461.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.68-0.490.79 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-72.1%-34.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%-33.9%-16.1% -1.2%
52-week high $24.14$18.76$55.73 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$11.60$36.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGNUUBS
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.1x 16.6xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x —median 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 11.3xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x -44.0xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 4.5xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.34 0.03median 1.34 —median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGNUUBS
Revenue $31.62B $19.34B –
Gross profit $29.85B $7.97B –
Operating income $18.02B $4.39B –
Net income $13.97B $3.61B –
Free cash flow – -$1.36B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $0.74 –
Cash & equivalents – $13.55B $215.72B
Total debt $494.43B $14.55B $104.15B
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 4.91B 3.29B
Enterprise value -$77.20B $3.91B -$773.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGNUUBS
P/E 16.2x 16.6x –
P/FCF – -44.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – -43.4x –
P/S 8.1x 3.1x –
P/B 2.4x 4.5x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 4.8x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 11.3x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 11.6x –
EV/Revenue 3.1x 2.6x –
EV/FCF – -37.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -36.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 0.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGNUUBS
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 50.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 45.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% 42.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 48.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% 38.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% 132.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 56.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 260.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 56.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 603.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -135.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -39.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -134.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -38.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGNUUBS
Gross margin 94.4% 41.2% –
EBITDA margin – 23.4% –
Operating margin 57.0% 22.7% –
Pretax margin 59.6% 22.7% –
Net margin 47.7% 18.7% –
FCF margin – -7.0% –
Operating cash flow margin – -7.1% –
Return on equity 11.7% 24.5% –
Return on assets 0.5% 4.0% –
Return on invested capital 3.6% 18.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGNUUBS
Debt / assets 4.7% 5.7% 1.7%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.0x –
Debt / FCF – -3.4x –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 84.0% 94.8%
Equity / assets 4.0% 16.0% 5.2%
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.2x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGNUUBS
Dividend yield 1.4% – 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 0.0% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGNUUBS
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 – 12.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $-2.06FY2023 $3.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 – +38.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% – +14.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $42.10BFY2029 $52.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +3,295.3%FY2029 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% – +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGNUUBS
Held by institutions 3.0% 59.8% –
Institutions holding 574 854 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +0.3% –
Institutions buying 324 442 –
Institutions selling 160 305 –
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.45 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGNUUBS
MUFG 1.00 0.23 0.45
NU 0.23 1.00 0.36
UBS 0.45 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, NU and UBS?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $255.04B, Nu Holdings (NU) $59.93B, UBS Group AG (UBS) $156.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, NU and UBS?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, Nu Holdings (NU) 16.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, UBS Group AG (UBS) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, UBS Group AG (UBS) 12.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nu Holdings (NU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Nu Holdings (NU) +50.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Nu Holdings (NU) 18.7%). On return on invested capital, Nu Holdings (NU) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, Nu Holdings (NU) 18.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, Nu Holdings (NU) -22.5%, UBS Group AG (UBS) +21.2%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, UBS Group AG (UBS) +20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest dividend yield: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 1.44%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 1.18%. Nu Holdings (NU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Nu Holdings (NU) 46.1%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 26.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, NU and UBS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.