MUFG vs CM vs WFC Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.65 -0.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$251.92B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce 4, Wells Fargo & Company 3, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGCMWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $245.15B $109.11B $251.92B WFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 15.6x 12.4x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 16.5x 10.6x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +15.7% +5.4% CM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 29.9% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 26.3% — CM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.8% +40.4% -4.4% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.5%/yr +13.8%/yr +10.6%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 21.8% 25.6% CM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 52/100 38/100 CM

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGCMWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGCMWFC
Valuation 22 #284 of 362 26 #267 of 362 62 #138 of 362
Growth 75 #56 of 221 75 #57 of 221 21 #174 of 221
Profitability 66 #69 of 200 89 #22 of 200 –
Financial Health 5 #193 of 203 11 #180 of 203 –
Shareholder Returns 15 #291 of 342 59 #142 of 342 32 #234 of 342
Overall 36 52 38
  • MUFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • CM ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGCMWFCSPY
1 month -10.2%+1.7%-0.4% -0.8%
3 months -8.7%-2.3%-5.3% +3.5%
6 months +20.9%+4.7%+2.6% +7.0%
Year to date +33.0%+27.5%-11.3% +12.2%
1 year +42.8%+40.4%-4.4% +13.0%
3 years +155.9%+232.7%+113.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +36.8%+49.3%+28.7% +23.1%
5 years +278.6%+90.4%+65.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +30.5%+13.8%+10.6% +11.0%
10 years +316.0%+207.1%+79.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +15.3%+11.9%+6.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMUFGCMWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%21.8%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%23.0%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.920.830.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.631.86-0.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-47.4%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-6.6%-14.3% -1.8%
52-week high $24.14$123.74$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$82.39$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGCMWFC
P/E now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 12.1x 15.5xmedian 12.1x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 3.4x 4.6xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 4.3xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.0x 10.4xmedian 11.0x 12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.36 0.59median 1.36 1.10median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGCMWFC
Revenue $31.62B $23.35B $87.23B
Gross profit $29.85B – –
Operating income $18.02B – –
Net income $13.97B $7.33B –
Free cash flow – $10.29B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $7.41 $6.62
Cash & equivalents – $10.94B –
Total debt $494.43B $45.66B –
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 940.68M 3.07B
Enterprise value -$96.24B $68.19B $251.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGCMWFC
P/E 15.9x 15.5x 12.4x
P/FCF – 10.4x 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 10.4x –
P/S 7.9x 4.6x 2.9x
P/B 2.3x 2.2x –
P/Tangible book 2.3x 2.3x –
EV/EBITDA – 4.3x –
EV/EBIT 5.2x 4.5x –
EV/Revenue 3.0x 6.1x 2.9x
EV/FCF – 13.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 0.59 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGCMWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 15.7% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 11.1% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 25.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 27.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 24.8% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 26.4% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -16.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -16.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGCMWFC
Gross margin 94.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 142.0% –
Operating margin 57.0% – –
Pretax margin 59.6% 39.0% –
Net margin 47.7% 29.9% –
FCF margin – 44.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 44.1% –
Return on equity 11.7% 15.3% –
Return on assets 0.5% 0.9% –
Return on invested capital 3.6% 26.3% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGCMWFC
Debt / assets 4.7% 5.4% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x –
Debt / FCF – 4.4x –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 94.3% 92.1%
Equity / assets 4.0% 5.7% –
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.4x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGCMWFC
Dividend yield 1.5% 3.7% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – -0.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.5% 3.0% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 42.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 30.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 12.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 19.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGCMWFC
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 16.5xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $7.02FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +12.4% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $25.13BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% -5.9% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGCMWFC
Held by institutions 3.0% 45.6% 76.8%
Institutions holding 574 566 2,875
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% 0.0% +1.1%
Institutions buying 324 291 1,290
Institutions selling 160 172 1,134
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.69 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGCMWFC
MUFG 1.00 0.48 0.31
CM 0.48 1.00 0.45
WFC 0.31 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, CM and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $245.15B, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) $109.11B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $251.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, CM and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 15.6x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.3x, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 16.5x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +15.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 29.9%). On return on invested capital, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 26.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +42.8%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +40.4%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -4.4%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +30.5%/yr, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +13.8%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 0.03%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.00%. Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 21.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, CM and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.