MUFG vs BAC vs WFC Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, Bank Of America and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.68 -10.6% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$363.50B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.68 -0.3% 1M -5.0% 1Y
Market cap
$254.36B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 6, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3, Wells Fargo & Company 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGBACWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $243.95B $363.50B $254.36B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 11.3x 12.5x BAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x 11.2x 10.6x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +9.7% +5.4% BAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 26.5% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 13.1% — BAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.2% -4.4% -5.0% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.0%/yr +1.2%/yr +10.0%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 21.8% 25.5% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 70/100 40/100 BAC

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGBACWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGBACWFC
Valuation 20 #287 of 360 96 #17 of 360 63 #135 of 360
Growth 82 #36 of 191 82 #35 of 191 22 #149 of 191
Profitability 61 #66 of 168 73 #46 of 168 –
Financial Health 6 #164 of 175 24 #133 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 16 #287 of 341 76 #84 of 341 35 #222 of 341
Overall 37 70 40
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGBACWFCSPY
1 month -8.5%-10.6%-0.3% -0.2%
3 months -4.2%-19.1%-4.9% +3.9%
6 months +22.5%-3.8%+1.4% +8.2%
Year to date +35.5%-7.9%-11.3% +12.9%
1 year +44.2%-4.4%-5.0% +12.3%
3 years +160.8%+101.4%+113.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.7%+26.3%+28.8% +23.3%
5 years +285.1%+6.1%+61.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +31.0%+1.2%+10.0% +10.9%
10 years +318.1%+199.7%+78.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.4%+11.6%+5.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMUFGBACWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%21.8%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%25.6%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.920.720.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.68-0.20-0.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-49.0%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%-21.8%-14.2% -1.2%
52-week high $24.14$64.82$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$46.72$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGBACWFC
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 1.4xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 3.8xmedian 10.9x 12.7xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.34 1.40median 1.34 1.10median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGBACWFC
Revenue $31.62B $121.10B $87.23B
Gross profit $29.85B – –
Operating income $18.02B – –
Net income $13.97B $33.66B –
Free cash flow – $94.74B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $4.41 $6.62
Cash & equivalents – $229.75B –
Total debt $494.43B $399.84B –
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 7.29B 3.07B
Enterprise value -$97.44B -$2.01T $254.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGBACWFC
P/E 16.2x 11.3x 12.4x
P/FCF – 3.8x 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.8x –
P/S 8.1x 2.9x 2.9x
P/B 2.4x 1.2x –
P/Tangible book 2.4x 1.2x –
EV/EBITDA – 1.4x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 1.4x –
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.4x 2.9x
EV/FCF – 1.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 1.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 1.40 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGBACWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 9.7% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 6.4% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 20.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 4.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 27.5% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 8.0% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGBACWFC
Gross margin 94.4% – –
EBITDA margin – 99.4% –
Operating margin 57.0% – –
Pretax margin 59.6% 36.2% –
Net margin 47.7% 26.5% –
FCF margin – 78.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 78.2% –
Return on equity 11.7% 11.2% –
Return on assets 0.5% 1.0% –
Return on invested capital 3.6% 13.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGBACWFC
Debt / assets 4.7% 11.4% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.6x –
Debt / FCF – 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 91.4% 92.1%
Equity / assets 4.0% 8.6% –
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.6x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGBACWFC
Dividend yield 1.4% 2.3% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 6.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 8.9% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGBACWFC
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $4.52FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +19.9% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $127.79BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% -2.4% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGBACWFC
Held by institutions 3.0% 75.0% 76.8%
Institutions holding 574 3,614 2,877
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +0.7% +1.1%
Institutions buying 324 1,827 1,292
Institutions selling 160 1,342 1,134
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.36 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGBACWFC
MUFG 1.00 0.42 0.31
BAC 0.42 1.00 0.77
WFC 0.31 0.77 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, BAC and WFC?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $243.95B, Bank Of America (BAC) $363.50B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $254.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, BAC and WFC?

Bank Of America (BAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.3x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bank Of America (BAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Bank Of America (BAC) 26.5%). On return on invested capital, Bank Of America (BAC) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, Bank Of America (BAC) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, Bank Of America (BAC) -4.4%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -5.0%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, Bank Of America (BAC) +1.2%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%, Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.00%. Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Bank Of America (BAC) 21.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, BAC and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.