MU vs TSEM Stock Comparison

Micron Technology and Tower Semiconductor Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MU Micron Technology Inc
$903.70 -16.5% 1M +312.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.05T
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$133.19B
Div. yield
0.00%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
10 wins
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd
$178.75 -22.4% 1M +135.9% 1Y
Market cap
$21.20B
P/E
68.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.71B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Micron Technology leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Micron Technology 10, Tower Semiconductor 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUTSEMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.05T $21.20B MU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.3x 68.8x MU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.9x 47.7x MU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +256.3% +14.9% MU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 63.8% 18.0% MU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 67.7% 8.7% MU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -2.2x TSEM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +312.6% +135.9% MU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +67.7%/yr +41.5%/yr MU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.8% 83.5% MU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 87/100 72/100 MU

Percentile Scorecard

MUTSEM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUTSEM
Valuation 88 #12 of 95 61 #38 of 95
Growth 100 #1 of 93 73 #26 of 93
Profitability 100 #1 of 91 74 #24 of 91
Financial Health 73 #28 of 101 82 #19 of 101
Shareholder Returns 76 #19 of 75 –
Overall 87 72
  • MU ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • TSEM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUTSEMSPY
1 month -16.5%-22.4% -0.8%
3 months +0.4%-20.3% +3.5%
6 months +72.3%-12.1% +7.0%
Year to date +216.6%+52.2% +12.2%
1 year +312.6%+135.9% +13.0%
3 years +1,276.5%+669.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +139.8%+97.5% +23.1%
5 years +1,224.3%+465.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +67.7%+41.5% +11.0%
10 years +5,023.0%+1,028.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +48.2%+27.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMUTSEMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.8%83.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.6%77.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.353.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.871.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.8%-55.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.5%-43.6% -1.8%
52-week high $1,213.56$316.85 $779.14
52-week low $201.37$79.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUTSEM
P/E now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 42.1x 65.0xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 7.1x 11.8xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 27.5x 31.4xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 37.2x 14.1xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 4.2x 6.5xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 2.23 21.81median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUTSEM
Revenue $133.19B $1.71B
Gross profit $107.50B $459.38M
Operating income $99.34B $276.26M
Net income $84.97B $291.84M
Free cash flow $58.96B $1.42B
R&D $5.65B $94.01M
EPS (diluted) $74.34 $2.71
Cash & equivalents $38.36B $231.19M
Total debt $5.18B $764.88M
Shares (diluted) 1.14B 113.60M
Enterprise value $953.13B $15.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUTSEM
P/E 12.0x 65.0x
P/FCF 17.3x 14.1x
P/Operating cash flow 11.4x 23.2x
P/S 7.7x 11.8x
P/B 7.4x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 6.6x
EV/EBITDA 9.0x 31.4x
EV/EBIT 9.9x 68.0x
EV/Revenue 7.4x 11.0x
EV/FCF 16.7x 13.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.0x 21.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 21.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUTSEM
Revenue growth (1Y) 256.3% 14.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 104.6% 3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 622.8% 37.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 327.1% 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 916.8% 57.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 168.2% -4.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 895.1% 50.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 154.9% 0.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 879.4% 39.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 151.6% 3.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 411.7% 95.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 286.0% 29.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3,435% 60.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 126.6% 27.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUTSEM
Gross margin 80.7% 26.9%
EBITDA margin 81.7% 34.9%
Operating margin 74.6% 16.2%
Pretax margin 74.8% 18.9%
Net margin 63.8% 18.0%
FCF margin 44.3% 83.3%
Operating cash flow margin 67.3% 50.6%
Return on equity 71.0% 9.6%
Return on assets 51.5% 7.8%
Return on invested capital 67.7% 8.7%
Return on capital employed 72.2% 8.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUTSEM
Debt / assets 2.6% 3.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -2.2x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 29.4% 18.6%
Equity / assets 70.6% 81.4%
Interest coverage 937.2x –
Current ratio 3.3x 4.9x
Quick ratio 2.9x 4.2x
Cash ratio 1.6x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 14.35 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUTSEM
Dividend yield 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 0.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 1.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 16.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUTSEM
Forward P/E 4.9xFY2027 47.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $184.21FY2027 $3.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +143.9%FY2027 +63.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.3% +74.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $294.86BFY2027 $1.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +121.4%FY2027 +18.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.2% +56.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUTSEM
Held by institutions 77.9% 55.6%
Institutions holding 3,898 450
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% -10.0%
Institutions buying 2,302 244
Institutions selling 1,431 162
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUTSEM
MU 1.00 0.56
TSEM 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MU and TSEM?

Micron Technology (MU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Micron Technology (MU) $1.05T, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) $21.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, MU and TSEM?

Micron Technology (MU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Micron Technology (MU) 12.3x, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 68.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Micron Technology (MU) is cheapest (Micron Technology (MU) 4.9x, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 47.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Micron Technology (MU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Micron Technology (MU) +256.3%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +14.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Micron Technology (MU) has the highest net margin (Micron Technology (MU) 63.8%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 18.0%). On return on invested capital, Micron Technology (MU) leads (Micron Technology (MU) 67.7%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Micron Technology (MU) returned the most: Micron Technology (MU) +312.6%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +135.9%. Over five years, Micron Technology (MU) compounded fastest (Micron Technology (MU) +67.7%/yr, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +41.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Micron Technology (MU) 0.00%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 0.00%. Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Micron Technology (MU) has been the steadiest (Micron Technology (MU) 80.8%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 83.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MU and TSEM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.56, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MU and TSEM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Micron Technology (MU) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.