MTZ vs PWR vs RECT Stock Comparison

Mastec, Quanta Services and Rectitude Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTZ Mastec Inc
$176.46 -17.0% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$14.17B
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.11B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
3 wins
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$578.87 -10.8% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$86.99B
P/E
65.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.08%
Utility Construction Industrials
6 wins
RECT Rectitude Holdings Ltd.
$1.25 -3.8% 1M -63.7% 1Y
Market cap
$18.13M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
8.00%
Industrial Distribution Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 6, Rectitude Holdings 3, Mastec 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTZPWRRECTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.17B $86.99B $18.13M PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.9x 65.5x 6.5x RECT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.7x 36.5x — MTZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.5% +26.3% — PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% 4.0% — PWR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.6% 10.1% — MTZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.8x — MTZ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.08% 8.00% RECT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.7% +31.0% -63.7% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.5%/yr +36.7%/yr — PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.5% 44.8% 105.3% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 53/100 88/100 RECT

Percentile Scorecard

MTZPWRRECT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTZPWRRECT
Valuation 61 #21 of 52 22 #41 of 52 84 #8 of 46
Growth 78 #9 of 37 72 #11 of 37 –
Profitability 67 #13 of 37 75 #10 of 37 –
Financial Health 46 #31 of 57 55 #26 of 57 80 #10 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 42 #16 of 27 100 #1 of 32
Overall 63 53 88
  • MTZ ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • RECT ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTZPWRRECTSPY
1 month -17.0%-10.8%-3.8% -0.2%
3 months -43.5%-1.6%+15.7% +3.9%
6 months -53.0%-8.3%-7.4% +8.2%
Year to date -18.8%+37.2%-29.0% +12.9%
1 year -16.7%+31.0%-63.7% +12.3%
3 years +198.3%+251.1%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +44.0%+52.0%— +23.3%
5 years +96.8%+376.4%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.5%+36.7%— +10.9%
10 years +535.9%+1,953.5%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +20.3%+35.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTZPWRRECTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.5%44.8%105.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.7%42.7%93.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.771.730.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.310.69-0.60 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.0%-33.9%-85.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.7%-26.3%-63.7% -1.2%
52-week high $437.51$785.24$3.44 $779.14
52-week low $171.09$413.17$1.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTZPWRRECT
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 26.7x 65.5xmedian 26.7x 6.5xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.8x 2.6xmedian 0.8x 0.5xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 13.1x 30.2xmedian 13.1x —median 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 57.9xmedian 23.0x 38.0xmedian 23.0x -9.9xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 2.4x 8.9xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.57 2.13median 0.57 —median 2.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTZPWRRECT
Revenue $16.11B $32.91B –
Gross profit $2.08B $5.09B –
Operating income $895.00M $2.04B –
Net income $534.95M $1.35B –
Free cash flow $244.81M $2.29B –
EPS (diluted) $6.27 $8.70 –
Cash & equivalents $315.64M $506.43M $4.69M
Total debt $2.74B $6.10B $19.48M
Shares (diluted) 78.87M 152.44M 14.50M
Enterprise value $13.08B $85.17B $799.76K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTZPWRRECT
P/E 27.9x 65.5x 6.5x
P/FCF 57.9x 38.0x -9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 24.3x 27.4x –
P/S 0.9x 2.6x 0.5x
P/B 3.9x 8.9x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 13.3x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 12.2x 30.2x –
EV/EBIT 18.5x 45.5x –
EV/Revenue 1.0x 2.8x –
EV/FCF 67.8x 40.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 28.5x 29.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 2.13 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTZPWRRECT
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.5% 26.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 21.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.4% 29.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.0% 24.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 53.0% 36.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.4% 28.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 82.8% 36.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 267.8% 31.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 85.3% 35.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 242.4% 30.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.2% 59.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.0% 42.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -61.2% 68.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.6% 47.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTZPWRRECT
Gross margin 12.9% 15.5% –
EBITDA margin 8.4% 9.3% –
Operating margin 5.6% 6.2% –
Pretax margin 4.2% 5.3% –
Net margin 3.1% 4.0% –
FCF margin 1.5% 7.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 3.6% 9.7% –
Return on equity 15.2% 14.3% –
Return on assets 5.0% 5.0% –
Return on invested capital 11.6% 10.1% –
Return on capital employed 12.5% 12.6% –
Asset turnover 1.5x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 2.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTZPWRRECT
Debt / assets 25.1% 21.6% 12.0%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 11.2x 2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 67.0% 65.6% 42.3%
Equity / assets 33.0% 34.4% 57.7%
Interest coverage 5.0x 6.9x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.43 4.62 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTZPWRRECT
Dividend yield – 0.1% 8.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.1% 8.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 4.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 2.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 12.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTZPWRRECT
Forward P/E 18.7xFY2026 36.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.46FY2026 $15.88FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +44.4%FY2026 +47.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +23.8% +27.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.11BFY2026 $40.73BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +33.7%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.8% +9.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTZPWRRECT
Held by institutions 74.0% 88.9% –
Institutions holding 908 1,920 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +13.5% –
Institutions buying 513 972 –
Institutions selling 290 704 –
Buyers to sellers 1.77 1.38 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTZPWRRECT
MTZ 1.00 0.73 0.01
PWR 0.73 1.00 0.09
RECT 0.01 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTZ, PWR and RECT?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mastec (MTZ) $14.17B, Quanta Services (PWR) $86.99B, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) $18.13M.

Which stock is cheaper, MTZ, PWR and RECT?

Rectitude Holdings (RECT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mastec (MTZ) 27.9x, Quanta Services (PWR) 65.5x, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 6.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Mastec (MTZ) is cheapest (Mastec (MTZ) 18.7x, Quanta Services (PWR) 36.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mastec (MTZ) +23.5%, Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Quanta Services (PWR) has the highest net margin (Mastec (MTZ) 3.1%, Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Mastec (MTZ) leads (Mastec (MTZ) 11.6%, Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Mastec (MTZ) -16.7%, Quanta Services (PWR) +31.0%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) -63.7%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (Mastec (MTZ) +14.5%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +36.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rectitude Holdings (RECT) has the highest dividend yield: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.08%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 8.00%. Mastec (MTZ) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Mastec (MTZ) 53.5%, Quanta Services (PWR) 44.8%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 105.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTZ, PWR and RECT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.