MTN vs PUSA vs LUCK Stock Comparison

Vail Resorts, Powerus and Lucky Strike Entertainment Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$151.39 +11.2% 1M -4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
36.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
5.87%
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.91 -48.7% 1M -75.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Vail Resorts leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Vail Resorts 8, Powerus 1, Lucky Strike Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTNPUSALUCKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.39B $95.22M $599.82M MTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.7x -19.2x -12.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.3% +6.1% +3.7% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.2% -154.2% -3.7% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% — 9.0% LUCK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x — 6.5x MTN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.87% — 5.47% MTN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.1% -75.6% -46.3% MTN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.0%/yr — -15.3%/yr MTN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.0% 114.5% 54.5% MTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 24/100 43/100 MTN

Percentile Scorecard

MTNPUSALUCK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTNPUSALUCK
Valuation 37 #28 of 44 12 #39 of 44 58 #19 of 44
Growth 24 #33 of 43 0 #43 of 43 12 #38 of 43
Profitability 78 #10 of 41 8 #38 of 41 48 #22 of 41
Financial Health 30 #33 of 47 100 #1 of 47 9 #43 of 47
Shareholder Returns 68 #10 of 29 0 #29 of 29 89 #4 of 29
Overall 47 24 43
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LUCK ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTNPUSALUCKSPY
1 month +11.2%-48.7%-15.9% -0.2%
3 months -3.7%-33.2%-37.1% +3.9%
6 months +19.5%-51.4%-39.8% +8.2%
Year to date +14.0%-39.4%-48.2% +12.9%
1 year -4.1%-75.6%-46.3% +12.3%
3 years -26.7%—-57.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -9.8%—-24.9% +23.3%
5 years -55.6%—-56.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -15.0%—-15.3% +10.9%
10 years -2.5%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -0.3%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTNPUSALUCKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.0%114.5%54.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.2%116.3%59.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.461.261.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.11-0.66-0.85 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.0%-89.9%-76.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.4%-75.6%-53.7% -1.2%
52-week high $161.76$7.82$9.49 $779.14
52-week low $119.02$1.87$4.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTNPUSALUCK
P/E now vs peer median 36.7xmedian 17.0x -19.2xmedian 17.0x -12.9xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 29.6xmedian 1.9x 0.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 10.8x -8.3xmedian 10.8x 8.7xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 11.2x -40.1xmedian 11.2x -61.3xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 2.4x 2.0xmedian 2.4x -1.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -2.46median 0.56 —median 0.56 0.28median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTNPUSALUCK
Revenue $2.84B $3.21M $1.25B
Gross profit – – $844.13M
Operating income $420.54M -$6.56M $136.79M
Net income $170.74M -$4.95M -$35.78M
Free cash flow $248.00M -$2.38M -$9.78M
EPS (diluted) $4.12 $-0.10 $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $231.35M $22.20M –
Total debt $3.19B – $1.78B
Shares (diluted) 35.79M 49.86M 136.63M
Enterprise value $4.11B -$43.17M $599.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTNPUSALUCK
P/E 36.7x -19.2x -12.9x
P/FCF 21.8x -40.1x -61.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.2x -59.5x 5.8x
P/S 1.9x 29.6x 0.5x
P/B 9.7x 2.0x -1.5x
P/Tangible book 20.5x 2.0x -1.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.4x -8.3x 8.7x
EV/EBIT 19.8x -8.0x 17.4x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 16.3x 1.9x
EV/FCF 33.5x -22.1x -243.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.3x -32.8x 22.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.46 – 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTNPUSALUCK
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.3% 6.1% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.6% – 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 35.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -24.9% -922.9% -0.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.9% – -12.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.7% -960.6% -257.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% – -34.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.2% -195.3% -154.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.9% – -46.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.6% -149.0% -41.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.1% – -21.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -22.4% -139.7% -127.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% – -28.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTNPUSALUCK
Gross margin – – 67.8%
EBITDA margin 25.6% -196.5% 22.0%
Operating margin 14.8% -204.1% 11.0%
Pretax margin 8.0% -159.4% -3.2%
Net margin 5.2% -154.2% -3.7%
FCF margin 8.7% -74.0% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.9% -49.8% 8.3%
Return on equity 23.2% -11.2% –
Return on assets 3.0% -10.9% -1.1%
Return on invested capital 8.2% – 9.0%
Return on capital employed 9.3% -14.6% 4.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 0.3x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 106.7% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTNPUSALUCK
Debt / assets 57.7% – 55.2%
Debt / equity 5.7x – -4.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x – 6.5x
Debt / FCF 12.8x – -182.1x
Liabilities / assets 89.9% 3.0% 112.3%
Equity / assets 10.1% 97.0% -12.3%
Interest coverage 2.0x – –
Current ratio 0.8x 52.4x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.6x 52.1x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 52.0x –
Altman Z-score 1.51 39.86 0.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTNPUSALUCK
Dividend yield 5.9% – 5.5%
Net buyback yield 0.8% -39.1% 5.9%
Shareholder yield 6.7% -39.1% 11.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTNPUSALUCK
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.43FY2027 – $-0.06FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +31.8%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.95BFY2027 – $1.22BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +4.0%FY2027 – -2.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +9.8% – +14.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTNPUSALUCK
Held by institutions 100.0% 4.8% 50.3%
Institutions holding 439 32 55
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% +209.7% -0.8%
Institutions buying 226 27 24
Institutions selling 145 1 20
Buyers to sellers 1.56 27.00 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTNPUSALUCK
MTN 1.00 -0.01 0.27
PUSA -0.01 1.00 -0.02
LUCK 0.27 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTN, PUSA and LUCK?

Vail Resorts (MTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.39B, Powerus (PUSA) $95.22M, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) $599.82M.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%, Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%, Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -3.7%). On return on invested capital, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) leads (Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vail Resorts (MTN) returned the most: Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.1%, Powerus (PUSA) -75.6%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -46.3%. Over five years, Vail Resorts (MTN) compounded fastest (Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.0%/yr, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -15.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest dividend yield: Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.87%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 5.47%. Powerus (PUSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vail Resorts (MTN) has been the steadiest (Vail Resorts (MTN) 38.0%, Powerus (PUSA) 114.5%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 54.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTN, PUSA and LUCK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.