MTN vs MSGS vs MANU Stock Comparison

Vail Resorts, Madison Square Garden Sports and Manchester United Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$149.55 +9.9% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
36.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.72 +1.7% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.56B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Madison Square Garden Sports leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Madison Square Garden Sports 5, Vail Resorts 4, Manchester United 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTNMSGSMANULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.39B $9.26B $3.56B MSGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.6x 1,197x -61.6x MTN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.3% +11.0% +5.5% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.2% 0.7% -6.4% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% — 2.6% MTN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 2.9x 2.4x MANU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.0% +68.6% +13.8% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.4%/yr +15.9%/yr +5.0%/yr MSGS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.0% 29.7% 33.6% MSGS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 37/100 45/100 MTN

Percentile Scorecard

MTNMSGSMANU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTNMSGSMANU
Valuation 40 #27 of 44 16 #37 of 44 30 #31 of 44
Growth 24 #33 of 43 45 #24 of 43 76 #11 of 43
Profitability 78 #10 of 41 45 #23 of 41 50 #21 of 41
Financial Health 30 #33 of 47 41 #28 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Shareholder Returns 72 #8 of 28 – –
Overall 49 37 45
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTNMSGSMANUSPY
1 month +9.9%-4.6%+1.7% -0.8%
3 months +0.9%-3.2%-9.8% +3.5%
6 months +24.1%+14.7%+20.3% +7.0%
Year to date +12.6%+48.6%+30.2% +12.2%
1 year -2.0%+68.6%+13.8% +13.0%
3 years -27.6%+132.7%+17.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -10.2%+32.5%+5.4% +23.1%
5 years -56.7%+108.8%+27.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -15.4%+15.9%+5.0% +11.0%
10 years -4.2%+135.9%+34.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year -0.4%+9.0%+3.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMTNMSGSMANUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.0%29.7%33.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.2%23.8%32.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.460.530.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.052.310.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.0%-32.0%-54.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.5%-7.6%-14.3% -1.8%
52-week high $161.76$416.24$24.19 $779.14
52-week low $119.02$212.91$15.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTNMSGSMANU
P/E now vs peer median 36.2xmedian 17.1x 1,197xmedian 17.1x -61.7xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 8.0xmedian 1.9x 4.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 10.9x 291.8xmedian 10.9x 13.0xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 11.4x 151.1xmedian 11.4x 9.9xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 2.5x -35.2xmedian 2.5x 18.1xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -2.43median 0.57 -26.31median 0.57 3.65median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTNMSGSMANU
Revenue $2.84B $1.15B $909.31M
Gross profit – $320.12M -$21.12M
Operating income $420.54M $28.87M $30.28M
Net income $170.74M $7.76M -$57.81M
Free cash flow $248.00M $61.26M $363.93M
EPS (diluted) $4.12 $0.32 $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $231.35M $164.51M $89.13M
Total debt $3.19B $1.10B $3.96B
Shares (diluted) 35.79M 24.25M 172.43M
Enterprise value $3.79B $8.86B $3.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTNMSGSMANU
P/E 36.2x 1,197x -61.7x
P/FCF 21.5x 151.1x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.1x 147.7x 14.3x
P/S 1.9x 8.0x 4.0x
P/B 9.6x -35.2x 18.1x
P/Tangible book 20.2x -25.2x 18.1x
EV/EBITDA 11.4x 291.8x 13.0x
EV/EBIT 19.6x 323.9x 146.4x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 8.1x 4.9x
EV/FCF 33.3x 152.7x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.2x 149.2x 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.43 -26.31 3.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTNMSGSMANU
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.3% 11.0% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 9.1% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.7% 24.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -24.9% 94.9% 223.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.9% -30.3% 62.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.7% 134.6% -36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% -45.2% -19.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.2% 134.3% -35.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.9% -45.5% -16.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.6% -31.6% 128.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.1% -25.7% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -22.4% -30.4% 141.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% -26.0% 34.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTNMSGSMANU
Gross margin – 27.7% -2.3%
EBITDA margin 25.6% 2.8% 37.6%
Operating margin 14.8% 2.5% 3.3%
Pretax margin 8.0% 1.6% -7.0%
Net margin 5.2% 0.7% -6.4%
FCF margin 8.7% 5.3% 40.0%
Operating cash flow margin 16.9% 5.4% 27.8%
Return on equity 23.2% – -26.5%
Return on assets 3.0% 0.5% -2.8%
Return on invested capital 8.2% – 2.6%
Return on capital employed 9.3% 3.3% 2.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 8.1x -4.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 1.9% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTNMSGSMANU
Debt / assets 57.7% 16.8% 44.5%
Debt / equity 5.7x -1.0x 4.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 2.9x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 12.8x 4.2x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 89.9% 117.1% 90.3%
Equity / assets 10.1% -17.1% 9.7%
Interest coverage 2.0x 1.4x 0.5x
Current ratio 0.8x 0.5x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.50 3.53 0.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTNMSGSMANU
Dividend yield 5.9% – –
Net buyback yield 0.8% – –
Shareholder yield 6.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTNMSGSMANU
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.43FY2027 $-1.03FY2027 $-0.18FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +31.8%FY2027 -421.9%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.95BFY2027 $1.06BFY2027 $1.07BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +4.0%FY2027 -7.9%FY2027 +19.6%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +9.8% +1.5% -6.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTNMSGSMANU
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 17.1%
Institutions holding 439 463 125
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% +10.3% +5.0%
Institutions buying 226 247 63
Institutions selling 145 136 30
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.82 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTNMSGSMANU
MTN 1.00 0.16 0.22
MSGS 0.16 1.00 0.31
MANU 0.22 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTN, MSGS and MANU?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.39B, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $9.26B, Manchester United (MANU) $3.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTN, MSGS and MANU?

Vail Resorts (MTN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Vail Resorts (MTN) 36.6x, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 1,197x, Manchester United (MANU) -61.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads (Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Vail Resorts (MTN) -2.0%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +68.6%, Manchester United (MANU) +13.8%. Over five years, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) compounded fastest (Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.4%/yr, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +15.9%/yr, Manchester United (MANU) +5.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) has been the steadiest (Vail Resorts (MTN) 38.0%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 29.7%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTN, MSGS and MANU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.