MTH vs GEBRF Stock Comparison

Meritage Homes and Greenbriar Sustainable Living Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTH Meritage Homes CORP
$63.64 -2.1% 1M -10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.15B
P/E
12.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.75B
Div. yield
2.94%
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Meritage Homes leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Meritage Homes 3, Greenbriar Sustainable Living 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTHGEBRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.15B $11.85M MTH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.7x -4.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -13.3% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 19.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.94% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.9% +45.0% GEBRF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr -23.8%/yr MTH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.8% 395.6% MTH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — –

Percentile Scorecard

MTHGEBRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTHGEBRF
Valuation 71 #3 of 8 14 #7 of 8
Growth 57 #4 of 8 14 #7 of 8
Profitability – –
Financial Health – –
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall – –
  • MTH ranked among 10 companies in Homebuilding
  • GEBRF ranked among 10 companies in Homebuilding

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTHGEBRFSPY
1 month -2.1%-21.6% -0.8%
3 months -13.2%-38.3% +3.5%
6 months -8.7%-12.1% +7.0%
Year to date -3.3%+141.7% +12.2%
1 year -10.9%+45.0% +13.0%
3 years +14.1%-66.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +4.5%-30.4% +23.1%
5 years +19.7%-74.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.7%-23.8% +11.0%
10 years +283.8%-61.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.4%-9.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMTHGEBRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.8%395.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.1%737.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.99-3.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.280.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.8%-98.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.3%-50.8% -1.8%
52-week high $85.18$0.59 $779.14
52-week low $57.86$0.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTHGEBRF
P/E now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 11.8x -4.8xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 7.7x —median 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 17.4x -7.1xmedian 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.3x 4.9xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.53median 1.06 0.13median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTHGEBRF
Revenue $10.75B –
Gross profit $1.91B –
Operating income $1.71B –
Net income $329.27M -$6.16M
Free cash flow $414.71M -$1.66M
EPS (diluted) $4.98 $-0.06
Cash & equivalents $807.27M $410.30
Total debt $7.35B –
Shares (diluted) 66.13M 38.64M
Enterprise value $1.07B $3.86M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTHGEBRF
P/E 12.7x -4.8x
P/FCF 10.0x -7.1x
P/Operating cash flow 9.5x -7.1x
P/S 0.4x –
P/B 0.8x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA 3.0x –
EV/EBIT 3.0x –
EV/Revenue 0.5x –
EV/FCF 12.5x -5.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.8x -5.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.53 0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTHGEBRF
Revenue growth (1Y) -13.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -32.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -16.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -34.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -17.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -48.4% -62.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% -24.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -43.9% 44.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -24.0% -37.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 298.7% -265.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.2% 27.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 267.0% -265.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -23.7% 27.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTHGEBRF
Gross margin 17.8% –
EBITDA margin 16.1% –
Operating margin 15.9% –
Pretax margin 3.9% –
Net margin 3.1% –
FCF margin 3.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 4.1% –
Return on equity 6.5% -86.2%
Return on assets 4.4% -14.8%
Return on invested capital 19.1% –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTHGEBRF
Debt / assets 24.5% –
Debt / equity 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x –
Debt / FCF 4.5x –
Liabilities / assets 33.1% 84.9%
Equity / assets 66.9% 15.1%
Interest coverage 615.5x –
Current ratio – 0.2x
Quick ratio – 0.2x
Cash ratio – 0.2x
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTHGEBRF
Dividend yield 2.9% –
Net buyback yield 10.5% -5.1%
Shareholder yield 13.4% -5.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTHGEBRF
Forward P/E 12.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.98FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -21.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +5.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.11BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -12.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTHGEBRF
Held by institutions 100.0% –
Institutions holding 398 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% –
Institutions buying 204 –
Institutions selling 146 –
Buyers to sellers 1.40 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTHGEBRF
MTH 1.00 0.01
GEBRF 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTH and GEBRF?

Meritage Homes (MTH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Meritage Homes (MTH) $4.15B, Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) $11.85M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) returned the most: Meritage Homes (MTH) -10.9%, Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) +45.0%. Over five years, Meritage Homes (MTH) compounded fastest (Meritage Homes (MTH) +3.7%/yr, Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) -23.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Meritage Homes (MTH) 2.94%. Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Meritage Homes (MTH) has been the steadiest (Meritage Homes (MTH) 38.8%, Greenbriar Sustainable Living (GEBRF) 395.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MTH and GEBRF move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.01, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, MTH and GEBRF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Meritage Homes (MTH) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.