MTCH vs RUM vs SNAP Stock Comparison

Match, Rum and Snap Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTCH Match Group, Inc.
$45.21 +11.5% 1M +38.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.15B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.51B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
6 wins
RUM RUM Group Inc.
$5.37 -35.8% 1M -24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$117.28M
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
2 wins
SNAP Snap Inc
$6.34 +16.8% 1M -20.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.11B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.35B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Match leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Match 6, Rum 2, Snap 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTCHRUMSNAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.15B $1.62B $10.11B MTCH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x -10.3x -32.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% +12.7% +12.6% RUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.2% -135.0% -4.9% MTCH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.9% — -5.8% MTCH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x -1.2x -5.9x SNAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.6% -24.8% -20.3% MTCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.2%/yr -11.2%/yr -34.4%/yr RUM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.4% 77.4% 58.3% MTCH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 33/100 56/100 MTCH

Percentile Scorecard

MTCHRUMSNAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTCHRUMSNAP
Valuation 67 #56 of 167 20 #134 of 167 42 #97 of 167
Growth 43 #87 of 153 38 #95 of 153 87 #21 of 153
Profitability 94 #10 of 153 9 #140 of 153 35 #100 of 153
Financial Health 34 #118 of 179 66 #61 of 179 42 #105 of 179
Shareholder Returns 54 #44 of 94 – 72 #27 of 94
Overall 59 33 56
  • MTCH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • RUM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • SNAP ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTCHRUMSNAPSPY
1 month +11.5%-35.8%+16.8% -0.8%
3 months +16.5%-11.1%+40.3% +3.5%
6 months +22.5%-25.5%+4.6% +7.0%
Year to date +40.0%-15.0%-21.4% +12.2%
1 year +38.6%-24.8%-20.3% +13.0%
3 years +33.0%+11.2%-31.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.0%+3.6%-12.0% +23.1%
5 years -71.5%-44.8%-87.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -22.2%-11.2%-34.4% +11.0%
10 years +141.8%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.2%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMTCHRUMSNAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.4%77.4%58.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.7%71.3%58.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.913.212.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.19-0.32-0.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.2%-79.8%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.8%-47.5%-30.3% -1.8%
52-week high $46.53$10.23$9.09 $779.14
52-week low $28.90$4.67$3.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTCHRUMSNAP
P/E now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 17.5x -9.6xmedian 17.5x -33.9xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 1.4x 22.7xmedian 1.4x 1.7xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 14.5x -21.1xmedian 14.5x -79.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x 15.5xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median -43.8xmedian 1.7x 1.9xmedian 1.7x 5.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.70median 0.41 0.43median 0.41 -0.86median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTCHRUMSNAP
Revenue $3.51B $117.28M $6.35B
Gross profit $2.62B – $3.64B
Operating income $987.88M -$161.05M -$323.82M
Net income $707.80M -$160.12M -$311.24M
Free cash flow $1.14B – $705.55M
R&D $445.76M $20.75M $1.95B
EPS (diluted) $2.86 $-0.56 $-0.19
Cash & equivalents $580.58M $203.27M $958.85M
Total debt $3.55B $359.43M $3.53B
Shares (diluted) 247.76M 283.92M 1.66B
Enterprise value $6.46B $629.24M -$1.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTCHRUMSNAP
P/E 14.9x -9.6x -33.9x
P/FCF 9.1x – 15.5x
P/Operating cash flow 8.6x – 11.9x
P/S 3.0x 22.7x 1.7x
P/B -43.8x 1.9x 5.7x
P/Tangible book -26.6x 2.2x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 12.1x -21.1x -79.6x
EV/EBIT 13.5x -17.5x -36.5x
EV/Revenue 3.8x 24.0x 1.9x
EV/FCF 11.7x – 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x – 12.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.70 0.43 -0.86

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTCHRUMSNAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% 12.7% 12.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 16.8% 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% – 20.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.4% – 11.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 23.4% -34.1% 50.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -23.7% 39.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.6% 46.8% 43.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.6% -38.0% 38.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.1% 51.8% 42.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.4% -22.6% 39.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 26.2% – 56.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.1% – 54.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 25.8% – 79.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.7% – 105.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTCHRUMSNAP
Gross margin 74.8% – 57.3%
EBITDA margin 31.5% -113.8% -2.3%
Operating margin 28.2% -137.3% -5.1%
Pretax margin 24.6% -136.3% -4.9%
Net margin 20.2% -135.0% -4.9%
FCF margin 32.5% – 11.1%
Operating cash flow margin 34.4% – 14.5%
Return on equity – -18.8% -15.5%
Return on assets 16.8% -13.0% -4.2%
Return on invested capital 22.9% – -5.8%
Return on capital employed 26.9% -15.6% -5.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – -3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 6.9% 19.5% 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTCHRUMSNAP
Debt / assets 88.1% 16.9% 47.3%
Debt / equity -15.0x 0.3x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x -1.2x -5.9x
Debt / FCF 3.1x – 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 105.9% 32.9% 74.2%
Equity / assets -5.9% 67.1% 25.8%
Interest coverage 6.0x – -2.2x
Current ratio 1.7x 2.1x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.6x 1.3x 2.7x
Cash ratio 1.1x 1.0x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 1.30 1.77 -0.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTCHRUMSNAP
Dividend yield 1.7% – –
Net buyback yield 5.9% – 7.8%
Shareholder yield 7.6% – 7.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTCHRUMSNAP
Forward P/E 15.3xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $-0.50FY2026 $-0.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.25BFY2026 $255.37MFY2026 $7.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -6.9%FY2026 +153.8%FY2026 +19.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.0% +160.9% -0.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTCHRUMSNAP
Held by institutions 100.0% 11.3% 37.8%
Institutions holding 593 224 534
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +8.7% -2.3%
Institutions buying 292 128 254
Institutions selling 205 40 177
Buyers to sellers 1.42 3.20 1.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTCHRUMSNAP
MTCH 1.00 0.31 0.40
RUM 0.31 1.00 0.37
SNAP 0.40 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTCH, RUM and SNAP?

Match (MTCH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Match (MTCH) $10.15B, Rum (RUM) $1.62B, Snap (SNAP) $10.11B.

Which company is growing faster?

Rum (RUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Match (MTCH) +1.7%, Rum (RUM) +12.7%, Snap (SNAP) +12.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Match (MTCH) has the highest net margin (Match (MTCH) 20.2%, Rum (RUM) -135.0%, Snap (SNAP) -4.9%). On return on invested capital, Match (MTCH) leads (Match (MTCH) 22.9%, Snap (SNAP) -5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Match (MTCH) returned the most: Match (MTCH) +38.6%, Rum (RUM) -24.8%, Snap (SNAP) -20.3%. Over five years, Rum (RUM) compounded fastest (Match (MTCH) -22.2%/yr, Rum (RUM) -11.2%/yr, Snap (SNAP) -34.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Match (MTCH) has been the steadiest (Match (MTCH) 32.4%, Rum (RUM) 77.4%, Snap (SNAP) 58.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTCH, RUM and SNAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Match (MTCH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.