MTB vs RF Stock Comparison

M&T Bank and Regions Financial Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.59 +0.9% 1M +22.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.38B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.96B
Div. yield
0.03%
Regional Banks Financial Services
8 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.47 +3.9% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.42B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

M&T Bank leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (M&T Bank 8, Regions Financial 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTBRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.38B $24.42B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 11.4x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.9x 10.4x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.8% +4.4% MTB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.8% 28.2% MTB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.1% 14.6% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.04% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +22.4% +18.1% MTB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.8%/yr +3.4%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.5% 23.5% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 34/100 MTB

Percentile Scorecard

MTBRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTBRF
Valuation 47 #192 of 361 21 #285 of 361
Growth 18 #282 of 344 5 #326 of 344
Profitability 76 #85 of 348 39 #213 of 348
Financial Health 40 #206 of 340 46 #184 of 340
Shareholder Returns 70 #106 of 352 60 #140 of 352
Overall 50 34
  • MTB ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTBRFSPY
1 month +0.9%+3.9% -1.0%
3 months -11.2%-7.7% +2.9%
6 months +3.1%+2.6% +6.4%
Year to date +10.0%+5.1% +11.4%
1 year +22.4%+18.1% +13.1%
3 years +99.4%+100.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +25.9%+26.2% +21.5%
5 years +38.6%+18.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +6.8%+3.4% +10.9%
10 years +86.4%+167.6% +255.2%
10 years, per year +6.4%+10.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMTBRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.5%23.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.6%25.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.040.77 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-44.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.8%-12.1% -2.5%
52-week high $254.11$32.40 $779.14
52-week low $180.90$24.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTBRF
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.5x 11.3xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.5x 3.2xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 4.8x 6.5xmedian 4.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 11.4x 14.5xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.43median 1.48 5.18median 1.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTBRF
Revenue $9.96B $7.62B
Net income $3.03B $2.23B
Free cash flow $3.60B $1.67B
EPS (diluted) $19.58 $2.51
Total debt $18.18B $7.63B
Shares (diluted) 146.76M 857.00M
Enterprise value $32.38B $24.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTBRF
P/E 11.3x 11.3x
P/FCF 8.9x 14.5x
P/Operating cash flow 8.4x 13.6x
P/S 3.2x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 6.9x 6.6x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 4.2x
EV/FCF 14.0x 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.2x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.43 5.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTBRF
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.8% 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.5% -0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) 12.3% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 23.1% 15.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 2.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.7% -33.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.2% -6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 21.4% -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.4% -6.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTBRF
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 77.1% 64.2%
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin 39.4% 37.4%
Net margin 28.8% 28.2%
FCF margin 36.1% 21.9%
Operating cash flow margin 38.2% 23.3%
Return on equity 10.8% 11.8%
Return on assets 1.4% 1.4%
Return on invested capital 12.1% 14.6%
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTBRF
Debt / assets 8.3% 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 5.1x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 87.3% 88.3%
Equity / assets 12.7% 11.7%
Interest coverage 2.2x 2.5x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTBRF
Dividend yield 2.7% 3.9%
Net buyback yield 8.0% 4.7%
Shareholder yield 10.7% 8.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.9% 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 25.2% 55.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.1% 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTBRF
Forward P/E 10.9xFY2026 10.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.30FY2026 $2.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 +17.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.4% -2.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.59BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.3%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +16.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTBRF
Held by institutions 90.2% 84.8%
Institutions holding 1,148 1,105
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +2.9%
Institutions buying 524 559
Institutions selling 392 347
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTBRF
MTB 1.00 0.90
RF 0.90 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTB and RF?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: M&T Bank (MTB) $32.38B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTB and RF?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (M&T Bank (MTB) 11.3x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (M&T Bank (MTB) 10.9x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

M&T Bank (MTB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: M&T Bank (MTB) +5.8%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

M&T Bank (MTB) has the highest net margin (M&T Bank (MTB) 28.8%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (M&T Bank (MTB) 12.1%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year M&T Bank (MTB) returned the most: M&T Bank (MTB) +22.4%, Regions Financial (RF) +18.1%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (M&T Bank (MTB) +6.8%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: M&T Bank (MTB) 0.03%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (M&T Bank (MTB) 21.5%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do MTB and RF move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.90, a strong positive relationship. Holding both adds little diversification.

Which is the better stock, MTB and RF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, M&T Bank (MTB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.