MSN vs TBCH vs GPRO Stock Comparison

Emerson Radio, Turtle Beach and GoPro Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSN Emerson Radio Corp
$0.32 -25.6% 1M -38.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.64M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.69M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.38 +28.6% 1M -4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$318.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$297.77M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
GPRO GoPro, Inc.
$1.03 -20.2% 1M -51.4% 1Y
Market cap
$168.10M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$569.05M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Turtle Beach leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Turtle Beach 8, GoPro 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSNTBCHGPROLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.64M $318.23M $168.10M TBCH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.8x -99.7x -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 29.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -44.6% -17.5% -23.8% TBCH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -65.5% -1.1% -27.6% TBCH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.6% -160.2% TBCH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x -0.5x GPRO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.5% -4.2% -51.4% TBCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.6%/yr -9.9%/yr -34.5%/yr TBCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.5% 51.4% 113.0% TBCH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 60/100 10/100 TBCH

Percentile Scorecard

MSNTBCHGPRO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSNTBCHGPRO
Valuation 44 #24 of 42 49 #22 of 42 15 #36 of 42
Growth 7 #39 of 42 46 #23 of 42 10 #38 of 42
Profitability 3 #39 of 40 59 #17 of 40 13 #35 of 40
Financial Health 93 #4 of 43 50 #22 of 43 7 #40 of 43
Shareholder Returns – 96 #2 of 28 7 #26 of 28
Overall 37 60 10
  • MSN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • TBCH ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • GPRO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSNTBCHGPROSPY
1 month -25.6%+28.6%-20.2% -0.8%
3 months -15.8%+32.6%+49.3% +3.5%
6 months -26.6%+47.0%-25.4% +7.0%
Year to date -15.8%+16.7%-27.0% +12.2%
1 year -38.5%-4.2%-51.4% +13.0%
3 years -42.9%+104.2%-57.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -17.0%+26.9%-24.9% +23.1%
5 years -72.2%-40.5%-88.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -22.6%-9.9%-34.5% +11.0%
10 years -67.4%+210.2%-92.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.6%+12.0%-23.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMSNTBCHGPROSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.5%51.4%113.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%48.5%96.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.201.772.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.62-0.08-0.46 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.6%-78.0%-95.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.6%-3.5%-51.4% -1.8%
52-week high $0.53$16.98$2.12 $779.14
52-week low $0.32$10.14$0.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSNTBCHGPRO
P/E now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 16.1x -98.5xmedian 16.1x -1.1xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 12.1x 16.1xmedian 12.1x -2.0xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 11.9x 9.1xmedian 11.9x -7.3xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.2x 3.6xmedian 1.2x -5.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.64 -1.55median 0.64 0.01median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSNTBCHGPRO
Revenue $5.69M $297.77M $569.05M
Gross profit $603.00K $110.81M $157.32M
Operating income -$4.25M $9.20M -$120.35M
Net income -$3.73M -$3.19M -$157.00M
Free cash flow -$4.06M $32.25M -$23.28M
R&D – $17.81M $124.82M
EPS (diluted) $-0.18 $-0.17 $-0.92
Cash & equivalents $5.31M $19.57M –
Total debt – $80.69M $81.70M
Shares (diluted) 21.04M 19.18M 171.23M
Enterprise value -$43.99M $257.12M $140.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHGPRO
P/E -1.8x -98.5x -1.1x
P/FCF -1.7x 9.1x -7.3x
P/Operating cash flow -1.7x 8.6x -8.6x
P/S 1.2x 1.0x 0.3x
P/B 0.4x 3.6x -5.8x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 5.8x -5.8x
EV/EBITDA 1.1x 16.1x -2.0x
EV/EBIT 1.1x 38.5x -1.9x
EV/Revenue -0.8x 1.2x 0.4x
EV/FCF 1.2x 11.0x -9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.2x 10.4x -11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -1.55 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHGPRO
Revenue growth (1Y) -44.6% -17.5% -23.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.4% 5.8% -18.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.0% -14.6% -39.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -35.5% 27.6% -23.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.5% -70.4% -13.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -33.0% 30.2% -49.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% -116.0% -44.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 61.9% -81.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.1% -117.2% -33.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 63.3% -75.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.3% 19.6% 74.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -180.0% 13.0% -31.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.7% 29.0% 70.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -158.5% 17.2% -25.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHGPRO
Gross margin 10.6% 37.2% 27.6%
EBITDA margin -73.3% 7.4% -19.3%
Operating margin -74.7% 3.1% -21.1%
Pretax margin -65.5% -0.5% -27.3%
Net margin -65.5% -1.1% -27.6%
FCF margin -71.4% 10.8% -4.1%
Operating cash flow margin -71.4% 11.4% -3.5%
Return on equity -22.0% -3.3% –
Return on assets -20.2% -1.5% -40.3%
Return on invested capital – 5.6% -160.2%
Return on capital employed -25.0% 5.7% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.4x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -10.7x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.0% 2.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHGPRO
Debt / assets – 37.5% 20.5%
Debt / equity – 1.0x -2.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x -0.5x
Debt / FCF – 2.5x -3.5x
Liabilities / assets 8.7% 62.5% 107.4%
Equity / assets 91.3% 37.5% -7.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 12.1x 2.4x 0.6x
Quick ratio 8.5x 1.1x 0.2x
Cash ratio 7.9x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.57 2.43 -3.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHGPRO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 12.9% -1.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 12.9% -1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSNTBCHGPRO
Forward P/E – 29.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.56FY2026 $-0.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -27.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +82.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $360.68MFY2026 $572.94MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.7%FY2026 -12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +10.9% +22.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSNTBCHGPRO
Held by institutions 4.1% 68.8% 35.3%
Institutions holding 11 112 142
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.3% +3.8% +41.9%
Institutions buying 3 58 85
Institutions selling 2 37 23
Buyers to sellers 1.50 1.57 3.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSNTBCHGPRO
MSN 1.00 0.09 0.00
TBCH 0.09 1.00 0.17
GPRO 0.00 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSN, TBCH and GPRO?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Radio (MSN) $6.64M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $318.23M, GoPro (GPRO) $168.10M.

Which company is growing faster?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Radio (MSN) -44.6%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -17.5%, GoPro (GPRO) -23.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) has the highest net margin (Emerson Radio (MSN) -65.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -1.1%, GoPro (GPRO) -27.6%). On return on invested capital, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads (Turtle Beach (TBCH) 5.6%, GoPro (GPRO) -160.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Turtle Beach (TBCH) returned the most: Emerson Radio (MSN) -38.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -4.2%, GoPro (GPRO) -51.4%. Over five years, Turtle Beach (TBCH) compounded fastest (Emerson Radio (MSN) -22.6%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -9.9%/yr, GoPro (GPRO) -34.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turtle Beach (TBCH) has been the steadiest (Emerson Radio (MSN) 62.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.4%, GoPro (GPRO) 113.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSN, TBCH and GPRO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.