MSN vs TBCH vs AMCI Stock Comparison

Emerson Radio, Turtle Beach and AMC Robotics Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSN Emerson Radio Corp
$0.32 -25.6% 1M -36.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.69M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.58 +30.1% 1M -2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$316.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$297.77M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
AMCI AMC Robotics Corp
$2.07 -34.9% 1M -77.0% 1Y
Market cap
$52.88M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.31M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Turtle Beach leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Turtle Beach 8). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSNTBCHAMCILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.68M $316.69M $52.88M TBCH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.8x -99.2x -2.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 29.6x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -44.6% -17.5% — TBCH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -65.5% -1.1% -468.9% TBCH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.6% -1.8% TBCH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.5% -2.4% -77.0% TBCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.0%/yr -10.3%/yr — TBCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.4% 51.3% 197.9% TBCH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 60/100 30/100 TBCH

Percentile Scorecard

MSNTBCHAMCI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSNTBCHAMCI
Valuation 44 #24 of 42 49 #22 of 42 0 #42 of 42
Growth 7 #39 of 42 46 #23 of 42 5 #40 of 42
Profitability 3 #39 of 40 59 #17 of 40 15 #34 of 40
Financial Health 93 #4 of 44 51 #22 of 44 98 #2 of 44
Shareholder Returns – 96 #2 of 28 –
Overall 37 60 30
  • MSN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • TBCH ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • AMCI ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSNTBCHAMCISPY
1 month -25.6%+30.1%-34.9% -0.2%
3 months -17.9%+27.4%-56.7% +3.9%
6 months -25.8%+49.4%-70.3% +8.2%
Year to date -15.8%+18.2%-73.8% +12.9%
1 year -36.5%-2.4%-77.0% +12.3%
3 years -42.9%+106.7%-80.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -17.0%+27.4%-42.0% +23.3%
5 years -72.9%-41.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -23.0%-10.3%— +10.9%
10 years -66.7%+231.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -10.4%+12.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMSNTBCHAMCISPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.4%51.3%197.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%48.5%161.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.201.772.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.05-0.39 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.6%-78.0%-91.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.6%-2.4%-85.9% -1.2%
52-week high $0.53$16.98$14.65 $779.14
52-week low $0.32$10.14$1.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSNTBCHAMCI
P/E now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 16.0x -99.7xmedian 16.0x -1.9xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.6x 1.0xmedian 0.6x 8.8xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 9.8x 16.3xmedian 9.8x —median 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 11.9x 9.2xmedian 11.9x -6.1xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.2x 3.7xmedian 1.2x 4.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.64 -1.57median 0.64 0.02median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSNTBCHAMCI
Revenue $5.69M $297.77M $5.31M
Gross profit $603.00K $110.81M $2.53M
Operating income -$4.25M $9.20M -$186.37K
Net income -$3.73M -$3.19M -$24.88M
Free cash flow -$4.06M $32.25M -$7.71M
R&D – $17.81M $49.83K
EPS (diluted) $-0.18 $-0.17 $-1.10
Cash & equivalents $5.31M $19.57M $4.54M
Total debt – $80.69M $5.36K
Shares (diluted) 21.04M 19.18M 22.60M
Enterprise value -$43.95M $255.59M $34.70M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHAMCI
P/E -1.8x -99.7x -1.9x
P/FCF -1.7x 9.2x -6.1x
P/Operating cash flow -1.7x 8.7x -6.1x
P/S 1.2x 1.0x 8.8x
P/B 0.4x 3.7x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 5.9x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 1.1x 16.3x –
EV/EBIT 1.1x 38.9x -226.7x
EV/Revenue -0.8x 1.2x 8.0x
EV/FCF 1.2x 11.1x -5.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.2x 10.5x -5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -1.57 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHAMCI
Revenue growth (1Y) -44.6% -17.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.4% 5.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.0% -14.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -35.5% 27.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.5% -70.4% 94.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -33.0% 30.2% 20.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% -116.0% -1,271%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 61.9% -176.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.1% -117.2% -3,048%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 63.3% -113.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.3% 19.6% -712.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -180.0% 13.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.7% 29.0% -712.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -158.5% 17.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHAMCI
Gross margin 10.6% 37.2% 47.6%
EBITDA margin -73.3% 7.4% –
Operating margin -74.7% 3.1% -3.5%
Pretax margin -65.5% -0.5% -10.4%
Net margin -65.5% -1.1% -468.9%
FCF margin -71.4% 10.8% -145.2%
Operating cash flow margin -71.4% 11.4% -145.2%
Return on equity -22.0% -3.3% -5.3%
Return on assets -20.2% -1.5% -4.9%
Return on invested capital – 5.6% -1.8%
Return on capital employed -25.0% 5.7% -1.8%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -10.7x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHAMCI
Debt / assets – 37.5% 0.0%
Debt / equity – 1.0x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x –
Debt / FCF – 2.5x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 8.7% 62.5% 8.2%
Equity / assets 91.3% 37.5% 91.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 12.1x 2.4x 11.4x
Quick ratio 8.5x 1.1x 6.3x
Cash ratio 7.9x 0.4x 5.1x
Altman Z-score 0.57 2.44 28.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSNTBCHAMCI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 12.7% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 12.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSNTBCHAMCI
Forward P/E – 29.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.56FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -27.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +82.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $360.68MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +10.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSNTBCHAMCI
Held by institutions 4.1% 68.8% 2.4%
Institutions holding 11 112 14
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.3% +3.8% +15.8%
Institutions buying 3 58 10
Institutions selling 2 37 1
Buyers to sellers 1.50 1.57 10.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSNTBCHAMCI
MSN 1.00 0.08 0.13
TBCH 0.08 1.00 0.05
AMCI 0.13 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSN, TBCH and AMCI?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Radio (MSN) $6.68M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $316.69M, AMC Robotics (AMCI) $52.88M.

Which company is growing faster?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Radio (MSN) -44.6%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -17.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Turtle Beach (TBCH) has the highest net margin (Emerson Radio (MSN) -65.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -1.1%, AMC Robotics (AMCI) -468.9%). On return on invested capital, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads (Turtle Beach (TBCH) 5.6%, AMC Robotics (AMCI) -1.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Turtle Beach (TBCH) returned the most: Emerson Radio (MSN) -36.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -2.4%, AMC Robotics (AMCI) -77.0%. Over five years, Turtle Beach (TBCH) compounded fastest (Emerson Radio (MSN) -23.0%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turtle Beach (TBCH) has been the steadiest (Emerson Radio (MSN) 62.4%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.3%, AMC Robotics (AMCI) 197.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSN, TBCH and AMCI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.