MSN vs OWLT vs SKFG Stock Comparison

Emerson Radio, Owlet and Stark Focus Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSN Emerson Radio Corp
$0.32 -22.0% 1M -38.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.73M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.69M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
OWLT Owlet, Inc.
$4.18 -18.0% 1M -57.3% 1Y
Market cap
$120.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$114.86M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
SKFG Stark Focus Group, Inc.
$0.91 -65.7% 1M +1,720.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.05M
P/E
193.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Owlet leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Owlet 3, Stark Focus 2, Emerson Radio 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSNOWLTSKFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.73M $120.44M $9.05M OWLT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.8x -9.4x 193.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -44.6% +28.2% — OWLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -65.5% -11.2% — OWLT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.2% -57.3% +1,720.0% SKFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.7%/yr -39.2%/yr +62.7%/yr SKFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.3% 85.5% 308.5% MSN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 32/100 — MSN

Percentile Scorecard

MSNOWLTSKFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSNOWLTSKFG
Valuation 43 #24 of 41 3 #40 of 41 20 #33 of 41
Growth 5 #39 of 41 100 #1 of 41 78 #10 of 41
Profitability 3 #38 of 39 18 #32 of 39 –
Financial Health 93 #4 of 43 41 #26 of 43 –
Shareholder Returns – 0 #28 of 28 –
Overall 36 32 –
  • MSN ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • OWLT ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • SKFG ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSNOWLTSKFGSPY
1 month -22.0%-18.0%-65.7% +0.9%
3 months -15.8%-17.1%+127.5% +5.9%
6 months -27.3%-14.0%+810.0% +8.5%
Year to date -15.8%-74.2%+911.1% +13.3%
1 year -38.2%-57.3%+1,720.0% +12.4%
3 years -42.9%+3.2%+1,200.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -17.0%+1.1%+135.3% +23.5%
5 years -72.4%-91.7%+1,037.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year -22.7%-39.2%+62.7% +11.0%
10 years -66.8%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year -10.4%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMSNOWLTSKFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.3%85.5%308.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%94.3%324.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.202.300.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.61-0.675.58 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.6%-96.2%-99.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.6%-74.7%-70.6% -0.9%
52-week high $0.53$16.52$3.10 $779.14
52-week low $0.32$4.04$0.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSNOWLTSKFG
P/E now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 15.7x -9.4xmedian 15.7x 193.8xmedian 15.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 9.6x -21.6xmedian 9.6x —median 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 11.7x -14.1xmedian 11.7x -274.6xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.1x 5.2xmedian 1.1x -1,780xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.62 -0.15median 0.62 4.75median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSNOWLTSKFG
Revenue $5.69M $114.86M –
Gross profit $603.00K $62.89M –
Operating income -$4.25M -$7.23M -$30.27K
Net income -$3.73M -$8.82M $46.71K
Free cash flow -$4.06M -$8.53M -$32.97K
R&D – $15.87M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.18 $-0.45 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $5.31M $30.95M –
Total debt – – $127.01K
Shares (diluted) 21.04M 28.77M 9.95M
Enterprise value -$43.90M -$5.19M $9.05M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSNOWLTSKFG
P/E -1.8x -9.4x 193.8x
P/FCF -1.7x -14.1x -274.6x
P/Operating cash flow -1.7x -15.5x -274.6x
P/S 1.2x 1.0x –
P/B 0.4x 5.2x -1,780x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 5.7x -1,780x
EV/EBITDA 1.1x -21.6x –
EV/EBIT 1.1x -14.7x -299.1x
EV/Revenue -0.8x 0.9x –
EV/FCF 1.2x -12.5x -274.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.2x -13.7x -274.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -0.15 4.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSNOWLTSKFG
Revenue growth (1Y) -44.6% 28.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.4% 29.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.0% 33.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -35.5% 53.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.5% 56.4% 16.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -33.0% 50.7% 15.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% 81.9% 207.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 47.0% 52.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.1% 85.5% 207.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -63.8% 60.9% 40.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.3% 38.7% 1.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -180.0% 43.3% 14.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.7% 33.2% 1.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -158.5% 41.6% 14.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSNOWLTSKFG
Gross margin 10.6% 54.8% –
EBITDA margin -73.3% -4.3% –
Operating margin -74.7% -6.3% –
Pretax margin -65.5% -7.7% –
Net margin -65.5% -11.2% –
FCF margin -71.4% -7.4% –
Operating cash flow margin -71.4% -6.8% –
Return on equity -22.0% -39.9% –
Return on assets -20.2% -9.8% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -25.0% -19.9% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 11.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSNOWLTSKFG
Debt / assets – 18.2% –
Debt / equity – 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x –
Debt / FCF – -2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 8.7% 75.3% –
Equity / assets 91.3% 24.7% –
Interest coverage – – -3.6x
Current ratio 12.1x 1.6x –
Quick ratio 8.5x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 7.9x 0.6x –
Altman Z-score 0.57 -2.21 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSNOWLTSKFG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -31.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -31.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSNOWLTSKFG
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.23FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $115.73MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +9.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +20.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSNOWLTSKFG
Held by institutions 4.1% 59.2% –
Institutions holding 11 58 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.3% -3.4% –
Institutions buying 3 31 –
Institutions selling 2 14 –
Buyers to sellers 1.50 2.21 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSNOWLTSKFG
MSN 1.00 -0.09 0.06
OWLT -0.09 1.00 -0.02
SKFG 0.06 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSN, OWLT and SKFG?

Owlet (OWLT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Radio (MSN) $6.73M, Owlet (OWLT) $120.44M, Stark Focus (SKFG) $9.05M.

Which company is growing faster?

Owlet (OWLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Radio (MSN) -44.6%, Owlet (OWLT) +28.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Owlet (OWLT) has the highest net margin (Emerson Radio (MSN) -65.5%, Owlet (OWLT) -11.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stark Focus (SKFG) returned the most: Emerson Radio (MSN) -38.2%, Owlet (OWLT) -57.3%, Stark Focus (SKFG) +1,720.0%. Over five years, Stark Focus (SKFG) compounded fastest (Emerson Radio (MSN) -22.7%/yr, Owlet (OWLT) -39.2%/yr, Stark Focus (SKFG) +62.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Radio (MSN) has been the steadiest (Emerson Radio (MSN) 62.3%, Owlet (OWLT) 85.5%, Stark Focus (SKFG) 308.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSN, OWLT and SKFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Owlet (OWLT) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.