MSGS vs VICI vs SEG Stock Comparison

Madison Square Garden Sports, Vici Properties and Seaport Entertainment Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VICI Vici Properties Inc.
$23.72 +0.9% 1M -23.4% 1Y
Market cap
$25.63B
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.10B
Div. yield
0.07%
Gaming REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Vici Properties leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Vici Properties 5, Madison Square Garden Sports 3, Seaport Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSGSVICISEGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.26B $25.63B $289.84M VICI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1,197x 9.3x -2.3x VICI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +4.4% +3.1% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 67.5% -102.5% VICI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 4.6x 1.0x SEG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.07% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +68.6% -23.4% -8.2% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.9%/yr -4.6%/yr — MSGS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.7% 19.4% 31.6% VICI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 84/100 41/100 VICI

Percentile Scorecard

MSGSVICISEG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSGSVICISEG
Valuation 16 #37 of 44 88 #19 of 145 19 #36 of 44
Growth 45 #24 of 43 56 #62 of 141 48 #23 of 43
Profitability 45 #23 of 41 100 #1 of 134 5 #39 of 41
Financial Health 41 #28 of 47 86 #20 of 138 94 #4 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 90 #14 of 131 –
Overall 37 84 41
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • VICI ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SEG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSGSVICISEGSPY
1 month -4.6%+0.9%-2.3% -0.2%
3 months -3.2%-12.5%-13.3% +3.9%
6 months +14.7%-17.2%+0.4% +8.2%
Year to date +48.6%-15.6%+15.7% +12.9%
1 year +68.6%-23.4%-8.2% +12.3%
3 years +132.7%-13.2%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +32.5%-4.6%— +23.3%
5 years +108.8%-20.9%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.9%-4.6%— +10.9%
10 years +135.9%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.0%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMSGSVICISEGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.7%19.4%31.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.8%20.6%31.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.53-0.010.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.31-1.21-0.26 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.0%-36.6%-48.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.6%-23.4%-21.6% -1.2%
52-week high $416.24$30.97$29.18 $779.14
52-week low $212.91$22.54$18.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSGSVICISEG
P/E now vs peer median 1,197xmedian 17.0x 9.4xmedian 26.3x -2.3xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 4.0x 2.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 291.8xmedian 10.8x 11.7xmedian 14.4x -2.7xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 151.1xmedian 11.2x 10.6xmedian 23.3x -7.3xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median -35.2xmedian 2.4x 0.9xmedian 1.3x 0.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -26.31median 0.56 1.55median 1.91 —median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSGSVICISEG
Revenue $1.15B $4.10B $121.57M
Gross profit $320.12M $4.07B $8.70M
Operating income $28.87M $3.61B -$123.06M
Net income $7.76M $2.81B -$123.24M
Free cash flow $61.26M $2.47B -$40.19M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $2.54 $-9.74
Cash & equivalents $164.51M $288.06M $117.80M
Total debt $1.10B $16.93B $38.05M
Shares (diluted) 24.25M 1.09B 12.80M
Enterprise value $8.86B $23.75B -$126.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSGSVICISEG
P/E 1,197x 9.4x -2.3x
P/FCF 151.1x 10.6x -7.3x
P/Operating cash flow 147.7x 9.9x -7.3x
P/S 8.0x 6.4x 2.4x
P/B -35.2x 0.9x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -25.2x 0.9x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 291.8x 11.7x -2.7x
EV/EBIT 323.9x 11.9x -1.7x
EV/Revenue 8.1x 10.4x 1.8x
EV/FCF 152.7x 17.3x -5.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 149.2x 16.2x -5.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -26.31 1.55 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSGSVICISEG
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 4.4% 3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 7.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.7% 4.4% 127.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.9% 7.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.9% 0.1% -30.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -30.3% 8.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 134.6% 0.4% -3.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -45.2% 8.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 134.3% -2.7% -2.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -45.5% 6.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -31.6% 7.5% -15.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.7% 8.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.4% 7.4% -15.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.0% 6.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSGSVICISEG
Gross margin 27.7% 99.3% 7.2%
EBITDA margin 2.8% 89.2% -64.6%
Operating margin 2.5% 88.0% -101.2%
Pretax margin 1.6% 68.6% -101.4%
Net margin 0.7% 67.5% -102.5%
FCF margin 5.3% 60.4% -33.1%
Operating cash flow margin 5.4% 64.4% -33.1%
Return on equity – 9.6% -29.5%
Return on assets 0.5% 5.9% -22.7%
Return on invested capital – 7.8% –
Return on capital employed 3.3% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.1x 0.9x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% 0.4% 11.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSGSVICISEG
Debt / assets 16.8% 35.1% 7.0%
Debt / equity -1.0x 0.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 4.6x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 4.2x 6.8x -0.9x
Liabilities / assets 117.1% 38.7% 23.8%
Equity / assets -17.1% 61.3% 76.2%
Interest coverage 1.4x 4.3x –
Current ratio 0.5x – –
Quick ratio 0.4x – –
Cash ratio 0.3x – –
Altman Z-score 3.53 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSGSVICISEG
Dividend yield – 7.6% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 7.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 68.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 77.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSGSVICISEG
Forward P/E – 8.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.03FY2027 $2.83FY2026 $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -421.9%FY2027 +8.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -1.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.06BFY2027 $4.00BFY2026 $105.19MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.9%FY2027 -0.3%FY2026 -19.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +15.9% +34.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSGSVICISEG
Held by institutions 81.3% 95.7% 86.8%
Institutions holding 463 946 118
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.3% +2.7% +3.6%
Institutions buying 247 518 52
Institutions selling 136 342 25
Buyers to sellers 1.82 1.51 2.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSGSVICISEG
MSGS 1.00 0.05 0.19
VICI 0.05 1.00 0.22
SEG 0.19 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSGS, VICI and SEG?

Vici Properties (VICI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $9.26B, Vici Properties (VICI) $25.63B, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) $289.84M.

Which stock is cheaper, MSGS, VICI and SEG?

Vici Properties (VICI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 1,197x, Vici Properties (VICI) 9.3x, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -2.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%, Vici Properties (VICI) +4.4%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vici Properties (VICI) has the highest net margin (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%, Vici Properties (VICI) 67.5%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -102.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +68.6%, Vici Properties (VICI) -23.4%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -8.2%. Over five years, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) compounded fastest (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +15.9%/yr, Vici Properties (VICI) -4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.00%, Vici Properties (VICI) 0.07%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) 0.00%. Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) and Seaport Entertainment (SEG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vici Properties (VICI) has been the steadiest (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 29.7%, Vici Properties (VICI) 19.4%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) 31.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSGS, VICI and SEG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vici Properties (VICI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.