MSGS vs PUSA vs SEG Stock Comparison

Madison Square Garden Sports, Powerus and Seaport Entertainment Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.81 -49.9% 1M -73.1% 1Y
Market cap
$85.00M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Madison Square Garden Sports leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Madison Square Garden Sports 4, Seaport Entertainment 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSGSPUSASEGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.23B $85.00M $293.42M MSGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 934.9x -17.2x -2.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +6.1% +3.1% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% -154.2% -102.5% MSGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x — 1.0x SEG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +32.2% -73.1% -3.9% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.7%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.8% 109.1% 31.5% SEG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 24/100 42/100 SEG

Percentile Scorecard

MSGSPUSASEG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSGSPUSASEG
Valuation 16 #38 of 45 11 #40 of 45 18 #37 of 45
Growth 45 #24 of 43 0 #43 of 43 48 #23 of 43
Profitability 42 #25 of 42 7 #39 of 42 5 #40 of 42
Financial Health 45 #27 of 48 100 #1 of 48 96 #3 of 48
Shareholder Returns – 0 #28 of 28 –
Overall 37 24 42
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SEG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSGSPUSASEGSPY
1 month -27.8%-49.9%-1.0% +0.7%
3 months -24.7%-39.7%-12.4% +3.7%
6 months -9.0%-53.8%+3.5% +7.1%
Year to date +16.1%-42.5%+16.6% +12.8%
1 year +32.2%-73.1%-3.9% +11.9%
3 years +81.8%—— +85.2%
3 years, per year +22.1%—— +22.8%
5 years +58.5%—— +67.6%
5 years, per year +9.7%—— +10.9%
10 years +83.1%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMSGSPUSASEGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.8%109.1%31.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.2%108.5%31.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.451.290.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.85-0.67-0.12 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.0%-89.9%-48.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.8%-73.1%-21.0% -1.2%
52-week high $416.24$6.73$29.18 $779.14
52-week low $212.91$1.80$18.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSGSPUSASEG
P/E now vs peer median 934.9xmedian 17.4x -18.2xmedian 17.4x -2.4xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.9x 28.1xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 228.6xmedian 10.8x -7.5xmedian 10.8x -2.7xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 118.1xmedian 11.7x -38.0xmedian 11.7x -7.3xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median -27.5xmedian 2.5x 1.9xmedian 2.5x 0.7xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -20.55median 0.55 —median 0.55 —median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSGSPUSASEG
Revenue $1.15B $3.21M $121.57M
Gross profit $320.12M – $8.70M
Operating income $28.87M -$6.56M -$123.06M
Net income $7.76M -$4.95M -$123.24M
Free cash flow $61.26M -$2.38M -$40.19M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $-0.10 $-9.74
Cash & equivalents $164.51M $22.20M $117.80M
Total debt $1.10B – $38.05M
Shares (diluted) 24.25M 49.86M 12.80M
Enterprise value $6.83B -$53.39M -$123.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSGSPUSASEG
P/E 934.9x -18.2x -2.4x
P/FCF 118.1x -38.0x -7.3x
P/Operating cash flow 115.4x -56.4x -7.3x
P/S 6.3x 28.1x 2.4x
P/B -27.5x 1.9x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -19.7x 1.9x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 228.6x -7.5x -2.7x
EV/EBIT 253.8x -7.2x -1.8x
EV/Revenue 6.3x 14.8x 1.8x
EV/FCF 119.6x -20.0x -5.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 116.9x -29.7x -5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -20.55 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSGSPUSASEG
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 6.1% 3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.7% – 127.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 94.9% -922.9% -30.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -30.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 134.6% -960.6% -3.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -45.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 134.3% -195.3% -2.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -45.5% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -31.6% -149.0% -15.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.4% -139.7% -15.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSGSPUSASEG
Gross margin 27.7% – 7.2%
EBITDA margin 2.8% -196.5% -64.6%
Operating margin 2.5% -204.1% -101.2%
Pretax margin 1.6% -159.4% -101.4%
Net margin 0.7% -154.2% -102.5%
FCF margin 5.3% -74.0% -33.1%
Operating cash flow margin 5.4% -49.8% -33.1%
Return on equity – -11.2% -29.5%
Return on assets 0.5% -10.9% -22.7%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 3.3% -14.6% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.1x 0.3x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% 106.7% 11.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSGSPUSASEG
Debt / assets 16.8% – 7.0%
Debt / equity -1.0x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x – 1.0x
Debt / FCF 4.2x – -0.9x
Liabilities / assets 117.1% 3.0% 23.8%
Equity / assets -17.1% 97.0% 76.2%
Interest coverage 1.4x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 52.4x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 52.1x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 52.0x –
Altman Z-score 2.85 37.80 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSGSPUSASEG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -41.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -41.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSGSPUSASEG
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.03FY2027 – $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -421.9%FY2027 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.06BFY2027 – $105.19MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.9%FY2027 – -19.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% – +34.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSGSPUSASEG
Held by institutions 100.0% 4.8% 86.8%
Institutions holding 463 32 118
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.3% +209.7% +3.6%
Institutions buying 247 27 52
Institutions selling 136 1 25
Buyers to sellers 1.82 27.00 2.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSGSPUSASEG
MSGS 1.00 0.11 0.12
PUSA 0.11 1.00 0.09
SEG 0.12 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSGS, PUSA and SEG?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $7.23B, Powerus (PUSA) $85.00M, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) $293.42M.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%, Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) has the highest net margin (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%, Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -102.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +32.2%, Powerus (PUSA) -73.1%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -3.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) has been the steadiest (Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 37.8%, Powerus (PUSA) 109.1%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) 31.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSGS, PUSA and SEG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.