MSFT vs TEAM vs CRWV Stock Comparison

Microsoft, Atlassian and CoreWeave Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$532.60 +3.2% 1M +1.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95T
P/E
29.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$331.84B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
7 wins
TEAM Atlassian Corp
$223.41 +19.0% 1M +37.4% 1Y
Market cap
$57.06B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.57B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
2 wins
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.
$55.19 -37.0% 1M -58.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.82B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.59B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 7, Atlassian 2, CoreWeave 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSFTTEAMCRWVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.95T $57.06B $32.82B MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.5x -1,060x -17.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.1x 39.7x — MSFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% +26.0% +115.3% CRWV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% -0.8% -25.4% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.7% 0.0% -1.2% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -1.7x -0.5x TEAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.7% +37.4% -58.4% TEAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.5%/yr -11.6%/yr — MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 75.2% 95.8% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 42/100 49/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

MSFTTEAMCRWV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSFTTEAMCRWV
Valuation 57 #17 of 38 4 #28 of 29 68 #13 of 38
Growth 77 #9 of 36 77 #7 of 27 60 #15 of 36
Profitability 97 #2 of 34 32 #18 of 26 52 #17 of 34
Financial Health 84 #7 of 38 40 #19 of 31 38 #24 of 38
Shareholder Returns 80 #5 of 21 56 #8 of 17 30 #15 of 21
Overall 79 42 49
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • TEAM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • CRWV ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSFTTEAMCRWVSPY
1 month +3.2%+19.0%-37.0% -0.8%
3 months +36.9%+133.0%-22.0% +3.5%
6 months +25.4%+222.8%-50.7% +7.0%
Year to date +10.1%+37.8%-22.9% +12.2%
1 year +1.7%+37.4%-58.4% +13.0%
3 years +61.5%+26.6%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.3%+8.2%— +23.1%
5 years +64.8%-45.9%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +10.5%-11.6%— +11.0%
10 years +778.4%+676.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +24.3%+22.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMSFTTEAMCRWVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%75.2%95.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%63.4%92.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.000.813.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.050.50-0.61 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.6%-87.5%-70.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.0%-1.8%-60.6% -1.8%
52-week high $543.45$227.61$139.93 $779.14
52-week low $352.83$57.15$54.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSFTTEAMCRWV
P/E now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 29.6x -1,080xmedian 31.9x -15.8xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 4.2x 8.8xmedian 2.4x 4.0xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 24.2x 402.3xmedian 11.5x 7.3xmedian 24.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.1xmedian 15.1x 44.1xmedian 14.2x -2.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 3.9x 54.9xmedian 3.0x 6.1xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.30median 0.38 -20.67median 0.77 —median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSFTTEAMCRWV
Revenue $331.84B $6.57B $7.59B
Gross profit $225.47B $5.58B $5.12B
Operating income $155.24B $10.36M -$230.74M
Net income $133.75B -$53.83M -$1.93B
Free cash flow $66.99B $1.32B -$13.66B
R&D $35.56B $3.27B –
EPS (diluted) $17.95 $-0.21 $-3.50
Cash & equivalents $20.94B $1.24B $5.52B
Total debt $40.29B $989.56M $3.66B
Shares (diluted) 7.45B 260.16M 551.00M
Enterprise value $3.87T $50.33B $19.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSFTTEAMCRWV
P/E 29.6x -1,080x -15.8x
P/FCF 59.1x 44.1x -2.2x
P/Operating cash flow 21.6x 43.0x 4.4x
P/S 11.9x 8.8x 4.0x
P/B 8.9x 54.9x 6.1x
P/Tangible book 9.3x 92.8x 6.4x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x 402.3x 7.3x
EV/EBIT 25.2x 5,589x -123.7x
EV/Revenue 11.8x 8.8x 3.8x
EV/FCF 58.5x 43.9x -2.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.4x 42.8x 4.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.30 -20.67 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSFTTEAMCRWV
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% 26.0% 115.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 23.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.3% 29.0% 94.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 24.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.8% 107.9% -204.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 26.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 31.3% 79.0% -89.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.7% 52.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 31.6% 78.9% -50.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 52.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.4% -7.3% 983.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 15.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.5% -6.8% -72.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 16.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSFTTEAMCRWV
Gross margin 67.9% 84.8% 67.4%
EBITDA margin 59.9% 2.2% 51.2%
Operating margin 46.8% 0.2% -3.0%
Pretax margin 50.0% 0.3% -25.3%
Net margin 40.3% -0.8% -25.4%
FCF margin 20.2% 20.1% -179.9%
Operating cash flow margin 55.1% 20.6% 91.1%
Return on equity 31.2% -5.6% -39.4%
Return on assets 18.4% -0.9% -2.9%
Return on invested capital 26.7% 0.0% -1.2%
Return on capital employed 27.8% 0.4% -0.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -25.1x -3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 3.7% 24.4% 8.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSFTTEAMCRWV
Debt / assets 5.3% 16.2% 4.8%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.9x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -1.7x -0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.6x 0.8x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 82.7% 93.5%
Equity / assets 58.3% 17.3% 6.5%
Interest coverage 50.9x 0.2x –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 9.29 6.44 0.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSFTTEAMCRWV
Dividend yield 0.7% – –
Net buyback yield 0.5% 3.1% -9.9%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 3.1% -9.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 39.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSFTTEAMCRWV
Forward P/E 26.1xFY2027 39.7xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $20.39FY2027 $5.63FY2027 $-3.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.0%FY2027 -3.8%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +11.6% +24.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $402.39BFY2027 $7.29BFY2027 $13.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.3%FY2027 +10.9%FY2027 +157.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.9% +23.0% +113.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSFTTEAMCRWV
Held by institutions 73.9% 99.7% 72.3%
Institutions holding 6,227 696 962
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +4.9% +27.1%
Institutions buying 3,432 434 690
Institutions selling 2,425 193 171
Buyers to sellers 1.42 2.25 4.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSFTTEAMCRWV
MSFT 1.00 0.42 0.28
TEAM 0.42 1.00 0.01
CRWV 0.28 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSFT, TEAM and CRWV?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microsoft (MSFT) $3.95T, Atlassian (TEAM) $57.06B, CoreWeave (CRWV) $32.82B.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreWeave (CRWV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microsoft (MSFT) +17.8%, Atlassian (TEAM) +26.0%, CoreWeave (CRWV) +115.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Microsoft (MSFT) 40.3%, Atlassian (TEAM) -0.8%, CoreWeave (CRWV) -25.4%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.7%, Atlassian (TEAM) 0.0%, CoreWeave (CRWV) -1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Atlassian (TEAM) returned the most: Microsoft (MSFT) +1.7%, Atlassian (TEAM) +37.4%, CoreWeave (CRWV) -58.4%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Microsoft (MSFT) +10.5%/yr, Atlassian (TEAM) -11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%, Atlassian (TEAM) 0.00%, CoreWeave (CRWV) 0.00%. Atlassian (TEAM) and CoreWeave (CRWV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Microsoft (MSFT) 32.8%, Atlassian (TEAM) 75.2%, CoreWeave (CRWV) 95.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSFT, TEAM and CRWV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.