MSFT vs OTEX vs SSNC Stock Comparison

Microsoft, Open Text and SS&C Technologies Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$532.60 +3.2% 1M +1.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95T
P/E
29.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$331.84B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
8 wins
OTEX Open Text Corp
$27.63 +22.7% 1M -29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.78B
P/E
10.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.25B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 8, Open Text 2, SS&C Technologies Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSFTOTEXSSNCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.95T $6.78B $19.10B MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.5x 10.5x 22.4x OTEX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.1x 6.7x 11.9x OTEX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% +1.5% +8.7% MSFT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% 12.3% — MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.7% 8.1% — MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 2.8x — MSFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.7% -29.8% -3.1% MSFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.5%/yr -11.1%/yr +1.9%/yr MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 38.8% 29.4% SSNC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 58/100 52/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

MSFTOTEXSSNC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSFTOTEXSSNC
Valuation 57 #17 of 38 86 #5 of 29 82 #19 of 102
Growth 77 #9 of 36 42 #16 of 27 31 #68 of 98
Profitability 97 #2 of 34 68 #9 of 26 63 #36 of 95
Financial Health 84 #7 of 38 13 #27 of 31 –
Shareholder Returns 80 #5 of 21 81 #4 of 17 32 #44 of 64
Overall 79 58 52
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • OTEX ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SSNC ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSFTOTEXSSNCSPY
1 month +3.2%+22.7%+4.3% -0.8%
3 months +36.9%+17.0%+9.3% +3.5%
6 months +25.4%+22.7%+19.5% +7.0%
Year to date +10.1%-15.2%-6.2% +12.2%
1 year +1.7%-29.8%-3.1% +13.0%
3 years +61.5%-14.9%+68.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.3%-5.2%+19.0% +23.1%
5 years +64.8%-44.4%+9.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +10.5%-11.1%+1.9% +11.0%
10 years +778.4%-11.1%+149.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +24.3%-1.2%+9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMSFTOTEXSSNCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%38.8%29.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%40.3%30.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.000.830.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.05-0.77-0.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.6%-61.7%-44.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.0%-30.4%-8.5% -1.8%
52-week high $543.45$39.69$89.62 $779.14
52-week low $352.83$20.01$62.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSFTOTEXSSNC
P/E now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 29.6x 10.7xmedian 31.9x 22.9xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 4.2x 1.3xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 24.2x 6.7xmedian 11.5x —median 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.1xmedian 15.1x 8.3xmedian 14.2x 10.4xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 3.9x 1.7xmedian 3.0x —median 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.30median 0.38 0.16median 0.77 1.77median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSFTOTEXSSNC
Revenue $331.84B $5.25B $6.69B
Gross profit $225.47B $3.87B $3.22B
Operating income $155.24B $1.08B $1.59B
Net income $133.75B $643.26M $853.70M
Free cash flow $66.99B $807.52M –
R&D $35.56B $647.71M $530.10M
EPS (diluted) $17.95 $2.58 $3.52
Cash & equivalents $20.94B $956.02M $525.40M
Total debt $40.29B $5.77B –
Shares (diluted) 7.45B 249.37M 242.00M
Enterprise value $3.87T $2.21B $19.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXSSNC
P/E 29.6x 10.7x 22.9x
P/FCF 59.1x 8.3x 10.4x
P/Operating cash flow 21.6x 6.6x 10.3x
P/S 11.9x 1.3x 2.9x
P/B 8.9x 1.7x –
P/Tangible book 9.3x 2.6x –
EV/EBITDA 19.7x 6.7x –
EV/EBIT 25.2x 10.6x –
EV/Revenue 11.8x 2.2x 2.9x
EV/FCF 58.5x 14.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.4x 11.4x 10.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.30 0.16 1.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXSSNC
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% 1.5% 8.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 5.4% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.3% 3.6% 8.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 6.9% 7.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.8% 21.3% 11.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 28.0% 10.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.3% 47.5% 0.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.7% 62.3% 11.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.6% 56.0% 4.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 66.8% 13.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.4% 21.2% 17.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 8.9% 15.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.5% 17.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 7.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXSSNC
Gross margin 67.9% 73.7% –
EBITDA margin 59.9% 32.6% –
Operating margin 46.8% 20.6% –
Pretax margin 50.0% 16.4% –
Net margin 40.3% 12.3% –
FCF margin 20.2% 15.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 55.1% 19.2% 27.8%
Return on equity 31.2% 16.1% –
Return on assets 18.4% 4.9% 4.2%
Return on invested capital 26.7% 8.1% –
Return on capital employed 27.8% 10.2% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.6x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.7% 1.5% 4.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXSSNC
Debt / assets 5.3% 44.0% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 2.8x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 7.1x –
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 69.4% 66.8%
Equity / assets 58.3% 30.6% –
Interest coverage 50.9x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.4x –
Altman Z-score 9.29 1.28 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXSSNC
Dividend yield 0.7% 4.0% 1.4%
Net buyback yield 0.5% 6.2% –
Shareholder yield 1.2% 10.2% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 39.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSFTOTEXSSNC
Forward P/E 26.1xFY2027 6.7xFY2027 11.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.39FY2027 $4.15FY2027 $6.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.0%FY2027 -4.8%FY2027 +12.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.6% 0.0% +7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $402.39BFY2027 $5.05BFY2027 $7.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.3%FY2027 -2.5%FY2027 +14.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.9% +1.2% -7.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSFTOTEXSSNC
Held by institutions 73.9% 81.5% 84.8%
Institutions holding 6,227 270 724
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +6.5% +1.7%
Institutions buying 3,432 159 385
Institutions selling 2,425 82 259
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.94 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSFTOTEXSSNC
MSFT 1.00 0.44 0.30
OTEX 0.44 1.00 0.60
SSNC 0.30 0.60 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSFT, OTEX and SSNC?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microsoft (MSFT) $3.95T, Open Text (OTEX) $6.78B, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) $19.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, MSFT, OTEX and SSNC?

Open Text (OTEX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Microsoft (MSFT) 29.5x, Open Text (OTEX) 10.5x, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 22.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Open Text (OTEX) is cheapest (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.1x, Open Text (OTEX) 6.7x, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 11.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Microsoft (MSFT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microsoft (MSFT) +17.8%, Open Text (OTEX) +1.5%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) +8.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Microsoft (MSFT) 40.3%, Open Text (OTEX) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.7%, Open Text (OTEX) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Microsoft (MSFT) returned the most: Microsoft (MSFT) +1.7%, Open Text (OTEX) -29.8%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) -3.1%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Microsoft (MSFT) +10.5%/yr, Open Text (OTEX) -11.1%/yr, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) +1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%, Open Text (OTEX) 0.00%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 0.00%. Open Text (OTEX) and SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) has been the steadiest (Microsoft (MSFT) 32.8%, Open Text (OTEX) 38.8%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSFT, OTEX and SSNC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.